Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan McCain Says Yes to Legalizing Marijuana
The Daily Beast ^ | Jun 11, 2012

Posted on 06/12/2012 8:25:41 PM PDT by presidio9

In the new book, America, You Sexy Bitch: A Love Letter to Freedom, Daily Beast columnist Meghan McCain and comedian Michael Ian Black take a road trip across America and write about their experiences. The excerpt below is from their visit to New Orleans, and what happens after Meghan and Michael light up.

Meghan McCain: -SNIP-

Let me put it right out there. Yes, I have smoked marijuana a few times in the past. The first time was on a trip to Amsterdam in college and I was surprised by how mild of an experience marijuana was (and in my experience still is). It is a plant that makes me mellow and giggly and, quite frankly, tired. Yet, depending on where you are in the United States, smoking is possession, and that is either a misdemeanor or a felony. Split that hair however you want, it’s still a crime.

That being said, I believe that marijuana should be legalized. This is not a decision I have come to quickly or lightly. Over the course of the last four years, in discussions with friends pro and con, I believe the legal ramifications of possessing marijuana are egregious. For one reason, I think it is a substance that does no more damage than alcohol does, and second, if we legalized marijuana in this country and taxed the hell out of it, our economic problems would at least be temporarily helped a great deal. In fact, you could even use the revenue stream to pay for universal health care if you wanted.

Mostly though, I do not completely understand the allure and taboo associated with marijuana. -SNIP-

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: cannabis; drugs; drugwar; libertarians; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; meghanmccain; nomanwilllayher; pot; warondrugs; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: MacMattico
People are sick of taxes! You can’t just make it legal and expect to tax it. People will just grow their own and not be prosecuted.

True, very few taxes would be collected at first, and eventually, none.

Weed grows like weed, it isn't Scotch. As time passed whoever wasn't growing it or picking it from the vacant lots and from the side of the road, would be receiving it free from their friends, their kids, it would be everywhere.

41 posted on 06/12/2012 10:17:55 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If she had any redeaming qualities, we wouldn’t even know she existed. Because she is so messed up, the left loves to flaunt her stuff. She is too dim-whitted to realize she is nothing but the village idiot.


42 posted on 06/12/2012 10:20:35 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Who gives a Sh(& what Meghan McCain says, her only claim for fame is who she was born to. Just a shake of the dice.
43 posted on 06/12/2012 10:21:02 PM PDT by BooBoo1000 ("The plans I have for you are plans to prosper you.,not to harm you, Plans to give you hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
“Why is she still talking? Who the hell is letting her talk?”

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

You nailed it on with those questions. My first thought on reading the headline was, “How is her opinion relevant, on well, ANYTHING?” I guess it's just the Kardashian effect or the cult of celebrity. But she isn't even a celebrity. I don't get it at all. The janitor at my grand kids’ school has a more learned and erudite approach to the subject of legalizing marijuana than Meghan McCain. Are we nuts listening to this little twit?

44 posted on 06/12/2012 10:31:21 PM PDT by 1lawlady (To G-d be the glory. Great things He has done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Yes, I have smoked marijuana a few times in the past.

As evidenced by the stupid stuff she says using Valley Girl language on a regular basis. Like, oh my God!

45 posted on 06/12/2012 10:40:48 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

http://www.ktvz.com/news/31185174/detail.html#.T9fonpcEHww.twitter


46 posted on 06/12/2012 10:54:00 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

She doesn’t excite me, either, but give me a few (or more) tokes, and I’d “take one for the team”.


47 posted on 06/12/2012 11:16:03 PM PDT by tdscpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Dangit, I don’t want to be on the same side of an issue with this wench. Can’t she go back to campaigning for the homos?


48 posted on 06/12/2012 11:26:54 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
In the new book, America, You Sexy Bitch: A Love Letter to Freedom...


49 posted on 06/12/2012 11:40:44 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Nah, she’s still dumb, and still in desperate need of an editor.

For example:

“Over the course of the last four years, in discussions with friends pro and con, I believe the legal ramifications of possessing marijuana are egregious.”

Firstly, she has to have discussions with friends for years to decide whether something is egregious? Clearly not a sign of a sharp thinker.

Secondly, the sentence is a grammatical nightmare. It should read:

“Over the course of the last four years, through discussions with friends, both pro and con, I came to believe that the legal ramifications of possessing marijuana were egregious.”

Hey Meg, if you read this, that first one was free. Have your mom toss me 100k a year, and I’ll proofread the rest of the crap you write.


50 posted on 06/12/2012 11:41:59 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Right, just because you could manufacture product yourself, doesn’t mean that most people will choose too. Anyone can grow tomatoes in their yard, but most still choose to buy them from the store for convenience, quality, availability, or other reasons.

Also, $300/oz is still less than the street value for the quality of stuff you get from a California dispensary. So, even with taxes and the business marking it up to make a profit, the consumer is saving maybe 25% via legalization.


51 posted on 06/12/2012 11:48:52 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The less Meghan McCain says, the better!


52 posted on 06/13/2012 12:00:26 AM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarrellZero

Or eat more.


53 posted on 06/13/2012 12:03:16 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eak3

Like the people doing the bath salt thing would become “converts” to the marijuana religion?

Or maybe spray paint will be the next hot kick?

I frankly would rather have marijuana illegal than let the state become the new drug cartel through taxation and invasion of privacy.

I don’t think the states should profit from something that is federally illegal, that is racketeering.

If you want to grow the stuff in your garden like a vegetable, I don’t have a problem with it.

But, I don’t think registering with the government as a pot user is a really smart idea...

People are being arrested every single day because they went and gave the government all the necessary investigative information for surveillance.

Stupid is as stupid does...

How about just simply erasing all laws on marijuana at the state level and let the federal government take up the burden and costs of enforcement?

If marijuana is supposedly so safe, why does it need to be “regulated” ???


54 posted on 06/13/2012 3:17:17 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Like the people doing the bath salt thing would become “converts” to the marijuana religion?

Or maybe spray paint will be the next hot kick?

I frankly would rather have marijuana illegal than let the state become the new drug cartel through taxation and invasion of privacy.

I don’t think the states should profit from something that is federally illegal, that is racketeering.

If you want to grow the stuff in your garden like a vegetable, I don’t have a problem with it.

But, I don’t think registering with the government as a pot user is a really smart idea...

People are being arrested every single day because they went and gave the government all the necessary investigative information for surveillance.

Stupid is as stupid does...

How about just simply erasing all laws on marijuana at the state level and let the federal government take up the burden and costs of enforcement?

If marijuana is supposedly so safe, why does it need to be “regulated” ???


55 posted on 06/13/2012 3:19:36 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

She is a rave party f*ck pig...


56 posted on 06/13/2012 3:21:54 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments
When I see the “regulate/tax it” argument, I realize that things are probably better off as is.

The stupid control freaks willing to trade away everyone else's freedom for a little bag of weed is pathetic.

57 posted on 06/13/2012 3:25:00 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

How about simply ERASING state laws on marijuana and tossing the whole smelly pile onto the feds?

I’d rather have it illegal than allow the states to become the new drug cartels.


58 posted on 06/13/2012 3:27:16 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
I don't believe it should be criminalized.

I do support that all businesses or public positions should be able to test and reject applicants based on their drug use.

In addition, I believe no one on any public subsidy should be permitted any drug use and should be subject to frequent testing.

Legalizing it destroys the economic incentive for drug use. Drug testing eliminates the people who know they shouldn't do it if they want to succeed at anything.

59 posted on 06/13/2012 4:36:42 AM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Fat chance!


60 posted on 06/13/2012 4:53:23 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson