Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum launches conservative PAC ("defeating Obama is first priority")
Capitol Column ^ | June 9, 2012 | Captiol Column Staff

Posted on 06/09/2012 8:16:41 AM PDT by Innovative

Former Republican presidential contender and Pennsylvania U.S. Senator Rick Santorum announced the formation of a new conservative group Friday, saying it will seek to thwart President Obama's bid for re-election in 2012.

"The defeat of Barack Obama, and those who support his policies, will be our first priority."

(Excerpt) Read more at capitolcolumn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agoodguy; anotherpac; charliesheen; conservatives; elections; failed; lobbyist; obama; romney; santorum; whatasnob; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Conservatives, take note and follow Santorum's example!
1 posted on 06/09/2012 8:16:49 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I am tired of tiptoing here.

Romney might be to the left of McCain. But he is still to the right of the commie obozo.

And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).

VOTE OBOZO OUT! HOLD YOUR FREAKING NOSES AGAIN AND LET’S SET THE TABLE FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF REAL CONSERVATIVES!!!!


2 posted on 06/09/2012 8:21:17 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Rick Santorum continues to be a “Big Government Conservative”, instead of, truly, becoming a “small government conservative”, instead, and this is one of the ongoing problems with Rick. This, and his ongoing coming across as being a snob.


3 posted on 06/09/2012 8:22:39 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Too little, too late. Should have developed a sttrong conservative presence before the liberal used car salesman was annointed the Republican nominee.


4 posted on 06/09/2012 8:22:49 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I agree, it’s not too late and I know someone who is involved in this project, Patriot Voices, and it looks very promising.
We conservatives need all the help we can get to make sure our voices are heard.

Let’s give them a chance to become more relevant than “Cain solutions’. Rick Santorum was our best hope for a decent candidate. And if he stays relevant and in the public eye, it can do no harm.


5 posted on 06/09/2012 8:27:18 AM PDT by Mountain Mary (Head toward the sound of the guns in Wisconsin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

We are, where we are. The choice is Obama or Romney.

Every sensible conservative recognizes the “clear and present danger” Obama is to the US and understands that the ONLY way to defeat him is to get out and vote for Romney.

Time to face reality, instead of throwing temper tantrums resulting in re-electing Obama.

Even Santorum is realizing that now. It’s time for conservatives to follow his example.


6 posted on 06/09/2012 8:28:05 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Hey Rick———Uppa U.S.

say it fast.


7 posted on 06/09/2012 8:37:09 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Looks like you are another Obama-supporter — nobody, except Obama,— is good enough for you.


8 posted on 06/09/2012 8:42:18 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Do we need more conservative groups?
Will that give us more conservative voters?

Is this a positive development or another ego trip?

Is it more effective to have another relatively small group or would it be more productive to strengthen exisitng groups with an eye on consolidating (or coordinating) the various conservative movemments into a strong, cohesive national effort?

Could Santorum be more effective and have a greater impact bringing his stature, and presence to an existing conservative group?


9 posted on 06/09/2012 8:43:20 AM PDT by Iron Munro (John Adams: 'Two ways to enslave a country. One is by the sword, the other is by debt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I WILL NOT vote for Romney, period. Don’t try to guilt me into doing so. It won’t work.


10 posted on 06/09/2012 8:46:43 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Another Romney Republican fundraising front group.

*yawn*


11 posted on 06/09/2012 8:49:59 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

“I WILL NOT vote for Romney, period. Don’t try to guilt me into doing so. It won’t work.”

You can do anything you want, just face reality, be honest, and admit that the result of your action IS REELECTING OBAMA.

You should correct your statement to: “I WILL NOT vote for Romney, period. I prefer to give Obama a second term.”

I am merely pointing out that even the most conservatives, like Santorum, understand that defeating Obama is imperative for the survival of this nation and the only way to do that at this point is to get out the vote FOR Romney.


12 posted on 06/09/2012 8:52:54 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

I appreciate both your pseudonym and your stance. The fundamental issue is that a non-vote or a third party vote for anyone with no chance to win is simply a vote for the winner by default.


13 posted on 06/09/2012 9:07:22 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
("defeating Obama is first priority")

Conservatives, take note and follow Santorum's example!

Uh, no. Defeating Democrats, ALL Democrats, is the first priority. See tag line.

14 posted on 06/09/2012 9:11:09 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I wono’t have to hold my nose anywhere near as hard to vote for Romney as I did to vote for John the freakin “maverick(TM)” McCain..... Santorum has it dead to rights here, all we’re talking about at this point is getting the US government back under adult supervision.


15 posted on 06/09/2012 9:19:44 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; All
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
16 posted on 06/09/2012 9:20:41 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

This is not good news for conservatism.


17 posted on 06/09/2012 9:42:23 AM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Excellent point

Some in their hatred for Mitt Romney would him see rather see lose and make sure that arrogant, lazy pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave get reelected and accomplish his destruction of this great Nation

18 posted on 06/09/2012 9:46:56 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Clinton, with a Republican Congress was more conservative than Bush with a Republican Congress. Romney without a real Tea Party Congress will not be conservative at all.

The key is a conservative Congress, nothing else matters anywhere near as much.

19 posted on 06/09/2012 9:57:28 AM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Judge Robert Bork is heading up Romney’s judicial selection panel for all appellate judges, including the Supremes.

Isn’t this good enough reason to vote for Romney? The Supreme Court is at stake.


20 posted on 06/09/2012 10:09:49 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson