Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

Drivel.....
unless you love in california or New york, not voting for Mitt is a de facto vote for Obama.

You can rationalize till hell freezes over but it will not change the truth


58 posted on 06/05/2012 5:03:21 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: bert
unless you love in california or New york,

I have loved in California, on a beach, at sundown, with sand getting in the fiddly bits... But I have never loved in New York. And today, those days are long over.

No sale. No vote for Romney.

/johnny

61 posted on 06/05/2012 5:07:48 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: bert
not voting for Mitt is a de facto vote for Obama.

Prove it mathematically. Show me how a third party vote is a vote for Obama.

Go ahead.

Or you could save yourself some time and embarassment and admit that the ONLY reason you make such a nonsensical declaration is because you are angry that your candidate isn't actually ENTITLED to my vote, though you think he should be.

74 posted on 06/05/2012 5:40:46 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting to resist statism is voting smart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: bert
You can rationalize till hell freezes over but it will not change the truth

Kinda like being a MORMON.

133 posted on 06/06/2012 4:07:41 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson