Prove it mathematically. Show me how a third party vote is a vote for Obama.
Go ahead.
Or you could save yourself some time and embarassment and admit that the ONLY reason you make such a nonsensical declaration is because you are angry that your candidate isn't actually ENTITLED to my vote, though you think he should be.
To vote third party or not vote in the current presidential election is to knowingly declare one’s self to be irrelevant. There is no possibility of the third party candidate to win, therefore the vote is meaningless.
You are probably irrelevant in the big picture any way but if there are a few of you who insist on prideful voting for nothing, in a tight race your zealous pride could allow the Obama margin to exceed the Mitt total.
There are only two candidates. We have two parties and within those parties are a majority consensus of the various coalitions.
To choose otherwise is to become irrelevant to the process and of no value to the country
Your angry assumption, that voting against little barry bastard is making MIlt Rominy ‘my candidate’, comes across as an arrogant insult. And demanding mathematical proof is another childish insult. Do you undertsand that Obama will get a predictable number of automatic dron democrat votes? Do you understand that to prevent that automatic number from being enough to re-elect him requires that ONE candidate get sufficient votes to total greater than Obama’s total? If you comprehend those two realities then demanding ‘mathematical proof’ is an absurdism used to try and squelch rational thought.
Your angry assumption, that voting against little barry bastard is making MIlt Rominy ‘my candidate’, comes across as an arrogant insult. And demanding mathematical proof is another childish insult. Do you undertsand that Obama will get a predictable number of automatic drone democrat votes? Do you understand that to prevent that automatic number from being enough to re-elect him requires that ONE candidate get sufficient votes to total greater than Obama’s total? If you comprehend those two realities then demanding ‘mathematical proof’ is an absurdism used to try and squelch rational thought.
Good luck with THAT!
SOME folks seem to THRIVE on it!