Posted on 06/03/2012 10:37:55 AM PDT by Son House
Alan Krueger, head of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, pointed out that the country has added jobs for 27 months in a row, including 4.3 million jobs in the private sector. The economy still has a few bright spots. Americans bought cars and trucks a strong pace last month, giving automakers their best May since 2008.
Underscoring the challenge for Obama with five months to go in the campaign, a May poll by The Associated Press and GfK, a research company, showed that 52 percent disapproved of Obama's handling of the economy while 46 percent approved.
Some financial analysts said that the dismal job figures put pressure on the Federal Reserve to take additional steps to help the economy, but it was not clear how much good the Fed could do beyond trying to inspire confidence.
The central bank has already kept the short-term interest rate it controls at a record low of almost zero since the fall of 2008, during the financial crisis, and pledged to keep it there through late 2014.
It has undertaken two rounds of massive purchases of government bonds, starting in March 2009 and November 2010, to help drive long-term interest rates down and stimulate stock prices. Another program to lower long-term interest rates, known as Operation Twist, was announced last September and ends in June.
But low interest rates, other analysts pointed out, are not the problem. An investor stampede into bonds on Friday drove the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note as low as 1.44 percent, the lowest on record.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies next week before a joint committee of Congress, and the Fed next meets June 19 and 20.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
Thanks Son House.
Senator John Thune Statement on May Jobs Report
http://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=287f4f17-6120-4cf5-8909-5316b843e7ab
“Today’s weak jobs report further confirms what nearly 13 million unemployed Americans already knew, that the Obama economy isn’t working. It isn’t working for the one in two recent college graduates who can’t get a good job. It isn’t working for middle class families whose median income has dropped by $4,350. And it isn’t working for the 28,000 construction workers who lost their jobs in the month of May. Yet President Obama continues to block job-creating projects like the Keystone XL pipeline, which would create 20,000 jobs, many in the construction industry.
“The president’s policies of wasteful government spending, massive tax increases, and more job-killing regulations have failed to get Americans back to work. After a record 40 straight months of unemployment above eight percent, it is clear that President Obama’s policies have made the economy worse.”
thanks for the post. Can someone please explain how, with these figures, can anyone claim that they’ve ADDED jobs? Hasn’t there clearly been a huge net job loss, including people who’ve dropped out of the labor market?
Similarly, every week they announce 370,000+/- new unemployment claims. At the same time, they say the economy added 69,000 jobs. How can this be? Doesn’t this indicate a net loss of 300,000 jobs? What am I missing?
Actually, it’s 69,000 jobs “added” for the entire month of May with, as you state, new claims for unemployment around 370,000 or so EVERY WEEK.
Proving that either the polling is rigged, or that 46% of the people are breathtakingly stupid, or that they are so far in the tank for hussein's ideology they're willing to destroy everything and suffer misery and deprivation to advance it.
IMHO anyone who "approves" of hussein's handling of the economy is so ignorant or so easily manipulated they ought not be allowed to vote or in any way shape the future of our Country. Seriously, they are dangerously out of touch.
Or getting government money. Supposedly 10k a day are turning 65. That is 10k more voters a day in favor of government spending.
The mantra going forward will be “...if it weren’t for the Republican House, things would be better!”
This will be the story going forward.
Thanks again.
Those aren’t really numbers you can add up. There were 383,000 (IIRC, and probably revised upward next week) people who filed for unemployment for the first time last week. While that does tend to indicate that THOSE 383K jobs went away, it doesn’t say anything about, for example, how many people already on unemployment got (newly created) jobs. If there were 383K of them, then our net job change would be zero, even though there were 383,000 new unemployment claims (IOW, the number of unemployed didn’t change, just the people), right?
Well, no. We also do not know how many new jobs were created and taken by immigrants, people entering the work force for the first time, and people returning to the work force. And we don’t know how many people left the work force without filing for unemployment.
IMO, new unemployment claims are more of a measure of volatility. High numbers mean there were a lot of changes. Probably negative changes for most of the people involved, but not necessarily bad for the economy, since it only measures one piece of the job pie.
The dismal 69,000 new jobs is what is terrifying. While “new jobs” sounds good, that’s not anywhere near the around 400,000 (IIRC) we need to keep up with our growing population. IOW, the number of people without jobs went up by about 331,000 in May. Ouch.
The global(ist) economy is a very bad idea whose time has come and gone. Hooking all the train cars (nations) to the US engine or the Chinese engine is a very bad idea. The engines are bound to derail and crash all the cars - over and over again.
Trade relations should be up to each nation based on their own people’s standards of living, needs and interests, and not regulated by the UN.
Uh, I think the Fed has done quite enough already.
O.blame.a is going to blame Republicans while doing his best, via the criminal Holder, to encourage illegals to vote and vote often.
No it isn't. Stop blaming seniors for this.
Many of us, no matter how old, how poor or how "fixed" in income, can see the wreckage clearly because we were raised and educated in an earlier time that you don't give us credit for. We are not stupid or blind.
Stop lumping seniors with the entitlement crowd. We paid for our little bits. They didn't. And we recognize a sinking ship when we see one.
My little bits of contribution add up to way over what I will draw if you figure it inflation and the money I would have made if it had simply drawn interest for the over 30 years I have been FORCED to pay into the ponzi scheme.
If Congress had not stolen the money and spent it on YOU and YOUR INTERESTS and simply let it draw that interest, it would not have been a Ponzi scheme.
The road goes both ways, don’t be so quick to quote the party line. Cause the guys that wrote it, are the same ones that stole the money.
That's true for people who retired years ago (Ida Mae Fuller, the first "SS Retiree", paid $24, collected $22,000).
Between my half and the half I channel through my employer, I'm paying nearly $10,000 per year.
I've been paying the max for decades.
I ain't getting all that back in just two years.
Not by a long shot.
Obama could have kicked our ever-lovin asses if he had courted the older folks. Instead he’s come after them with a vengeance. They’re all afraid (rightly) that he’s going to try to pull their tubes. They are the biggest voting bloc, and they have nothing to do but go pull that lever and visit with the old folks running the polling places. Unless he can scare them away with thugs.
Oh, really? After 40 years of gov't extortion plus interest on what they took from us forcibly? Where are the figures for "2 years"? Link please.
I just noticed your tag, “Cheney/Rumsfeld 2012”.
Wow. I like that one better than any I’ve seen so far!
Too bad they’re both as old as me!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
