Skip to comments.
Former Harvard Admin Throws Warren Under the Bus
Brietbart ^
| May 27, 2012
| Ezra Dulis
Posted on 05/27/2012 10:24:48 AM PDT by QT3.14
Elizabeth Warren can no longer count the Harvard University administrator who listed her as "Native American" among her advocates in the unfolding scandal of her professed minority heritage.
In the reaction to the Boston Globe's controversial article on Harvard's EEOC reports which listed Elizabeth Warren as a Native American, one particular revelation has gone largely unnoticed. Alan Ray, the former administrator who filed diversity reports during Warren's tenure, distances the university from any responsibility for erroneously listing her as a Native American.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: chiefslingingbull; elizabethwarren; fauxcahontas; harvard; massachusetts; minority; nativeamerican; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: Ray'sBeth
From what I understand of that test, (and I admit I’m no geneticist,) it uses the mitochondrial RNA to trace maternal ancestry only, or if you’re a guy it can also use the Y chromosome to trace paternal ancestry. What that means is, if the branch of the family you’re trying to trace crossed genders at any point, (such as a maternal grandfather, or a paternal grandmother) it won’t show on the test. The DNA is still there, but it’s mixed together and can’t be sorted out from the “background” as easily, whereas the mitochondrial RNA always comes from the mother, and the Y chromosome always comes from the father.
That’s the hobby-scientist’s understanding of it, anyway. Those with more experience are welcome to correct me on this.
21
posted on
05/27/2012 12:19:28 PM PDT
by
Ellendra
("It's astounding how often people mistake their own stupidity for a lack of fairness." --Thunt)
To: Former Proud Canadian
How about falsifying a professorial application to Harvard Law school?
Lying lawyers, when caught anyway, are supposedly in heap big trouble. Judges take a real dim view of less than honest barristers. Why should Spreading Bull get a break? She should be summarily fired from Harvard Law.
When Lizzie will lie to get job at Harvard, why should voters not assume she’ll do the same for a Senate seat?
22
posted on
05/27/2012 12:43:50 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves)
To: QT3.14
So before Alan Ray gave Warren support, all those years, and now that her heritage claims come under serious scrutiny, he’s taking it back...?
Sounds like an Indian-giver to me.
23
posted on
05/27/2012 12:51:15 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Jacquerie
Lying lawyers, when caught anyway, are supposedly in heap big trouble. Judges take a real dim view of less than honest barristers. Why should Spreading Bull get a break?
Hmm. This is from the Massachusetts Bar Association's Rules of Professional Conduct. I wonder if Pinocchiahontas violated it in her Hahvahd application?
Rule 7.1 Communications Concerning a Lawyer's Services
A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading.
24
posted on
05/27/2012 12:54:18 PM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: Artcore
Her other name was “She With Pants on Fire”
25
posted on
05/27/2012 12:54:18 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Ellendra
I’ll bet she has some male relatives too, and they could be tested!
To: Ray'sBeth
The point is to get elected. Then you have a pension for the rest of your life.
It’s that simple.
Say whatever it takes. After all you are not paying for it.
27
posted on
05/27/2012 1:08:33 PM PDT
by
glyptol
To: LostInBayport
Very good. Harvard Law was her ticket to the 1%. I don’t expect we’ll hear of case studies on this.
28
posted on
05/27/2012 1:15:15 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves)
To: QT3.14; All
C'mon folks, of COURSE Elizabeth Warren is (laugh-chuckle-snort) a 'native American Indian', haven't
you seen the picture of one of her most famous ancestors? Let's hear it for
lol
29
posted on
05/27/2012 1:15:59 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
To: QT3.14
It's funny that the same school that forced out Larry Summers over remarks about women achieving high status, are now forced to defend a woman who falsified her identity in order to achieve high status.
-PJ
30
posted on
05/27/2012 2:01:37 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
To: Ray'sBeth
Ill bet she has some male relatives too, and they could be tested!She has a male cousin (as I recall) living in western Oklahoma who wrote Pow Wow Chow. Warren submitted a couple of recipes to that work.
31
posted on
05/27/2012 3:54:31 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
To: blueunicorn6
Oh man that is beautiful!
32
posted on
05/27/2012 4:28:06 PM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: QT3.14
I was wondering how soon I'd get to use this...
33
posted on
05/27/2012 4:33:07 PM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Fungi; blueunicorn6
Lots of Reds at Harvard period.
To: Ellendra
Yes, Ellendra, that’s my understanding of it also. Basically they could tell the origins of Warren’s mother’s maternal line, going back into pre-surname times.
FTDNA has a test called Family Finder now. It isn’t mitochondrial DNA or Y-Chromosome. I think it can identify relatives within very recent generations. Not sure what that would elucidate for Warren.
35
posted on
05/27/2012 5:22:27 PM PDT
by
Old_Grouch
(64 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
To: Jacquerie
being in the %1 means big wampum bucks :)
36
posted on
05/27/2012 5:44:49 PM PDT
by
isom35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson