Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: A Romney pick for top U.S. court? Frontrunners emerge
Reuters ^ | April 19, 2012 | David Ingram

Posted on 05/26/2012 2:08:35 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general under President George W. Bush and is now a lawyer in private practice, is the favorite of many conservatives. Clement argued last month for the Supreme Court to strike down Obama's 2010 healthcare law, and he is defending laws that ban same-sex marriage and that target illegal immigrants.

Clement, 45, would be "at the top of any short list right now," said Curt Levey, executive director of the Committee for Justice, a group that advocates for conservative nominees.

Asked about Clement, Mary Ann Glendon, a co-chairwoman of Romney's Justice Advisory Committee, voiced "unbounded admiration" for him.

"He's the type of person who fits the mold that the governor has pledged to look for," Glendon said, adding that "it's much too soon to speculate about names."

Mentioned as often as Clement is Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Kavanaugh, 47, sits on a court that produced four sitting justices. He has deep roots in Washington, D.C., having worked in the Bush White House and assisted in the 1990s investigation that nearly led to President Bill Clinton's ouster.

Kavanaugh is known for elaborate opinions such as a 65-page dissent he wrote in November exploring how an 1867 tax law barred courts from considering Obama's healthcare law until 2015.

A third possibility, Judge Diane Sykes, is often mentioned as a likely Romney nominee if the next person to leave the Supreme Court is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court's senior woman justice. Ginsburg has survived cancer twice.

Sykes, 54, was appointed to a Chicago-based U.S. appeals court in 2004, overcoming Democratic criticism of her record in abortion-related cases.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012issues; judiciary; romneyscotus; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: OrangeHoof

” Kinda getting ahead of ourselves here. He’s not even officially the nominee and now he’s making SCOTUS appointments?”

I don’t think so.

First, a disclaimer: I’m not a Romney “supporter”, I voted for Newt in my state’s primary even after it was clear he was going to drop out.

Nevertheless, I have read dozens, perhaps hundreds of posts in this forum claiming that, if elected, Romney would only nominate liberals or “middlers” to the Court.

If a President Romney nominates Mr. Clement — especially if the current Court tosses out ObamaCare — that would rate a “conservative home run” knocked right out of the ballpark.

I also recall reading, right here on FR, that the one of the advisors working with Romney on judicial appointments is none less than former solicitor general Robert Bork. Again, the gold standard of judicial conservatism. You can’t find a better consigliere than that.

So yes, I -do- think something like this warrants a close look by those who are “wary of Romney”....


61 posted on 05/26/2012 9:38:19 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

“If Clement is nominated, the libs and media will say he shouldn’t serve since he argued the Obamacare case. They will claim that shows him as too partisan. Seriously - they will make that argument with a straight face.”

My answer to that:
Thurgood Marshall...

.... who, after arguing and winning Brown v. Board of Education at the Supreme Court, was nominated to fill the next vacancy there....

And then, go ahead with it.


62 posted on 05/26/2012 9:41:18 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
The Mitt-Haters will be here soon enough to tell us all that there is no reason to expect Romney’s appointments to be better than Obama’s.

Mitt had ample chance to appoint judges when he was a governor. Clearly, a look at those appointments should qualm any fears, right?

63 posted on 05/26/2012 9:44:09 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
OTOH, 12% of the voters in Mass. are Republican, so he was starting from a very weak position. Also, Mass. has a "Governor's Council" where every judicial nominee goes for approval - the democrats held 8 of 9 seats. Romney appointed 9 Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters (but all gave to democrats) and 14 democrats.

I'm surprised he was able to get even 9 republicans. Most were appointed to district court or clerk magistrate level where Romney was interested in appointing those who were tough on crime.

As far as the MSC, Romney appointed a conservative member of the Federalist Society, Christopher Moore, to chair the Judicial Nominating Commission. He kept the libs to a low roar.

I tried to look at a Redstate article regarding the picks but it isn't responding right now.

64 posted on 05/26/2012 10:52:17 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
If Clement is nominated, the libs and media will say he shouldn’t serve since he argued the Obamacare case. They will claim that shows him as too partisan. Seriously - they will make that argument with a straight face.

That would argue that Thurgood Marshall of Brown vs. Board of Education fame should never have been seated on the court. I'm up for that debate any time any place.

65 posted on 05/26/2012 10:56:17 PM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 11 y/o granddaughter will have more relevant executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Clintonfatigued.


66 posted on 05/26/2012 10:58:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
OTOH, 12% of the voters in Mass. are Republican

Hmm.. it's interesting that Massachusetts elected Mittens.

67 posted on 05/26/2012 11:09:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; muleskinner

Mittens was the fourth republican governor in a row.

Massachusetts prefers republican governors, but the trend may have changed since Mitt, he left with 34% approval, and after weakening the state party, he also lost the governor’s seat to the democrats ever since he left.


68 posted on 05/26/2012 11:27:56 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Mittens was the fourth republican governor in a row.

Yes, prior to Mittens, Weld and Cellucci were elected and Swift completed Cellucci's term. All were "Michael Bloomberg" Republicans. They shrugged, wore the "Republican" label, then winked and nodded as everybody went along with the charade.

69 posted on 05/27/2012 12:08:35 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; muleskinner

Many of us remember failed rino warrior Weld.

Romney rejected, disliked, voted against, (renounced his republican party membership) Reagan, but named William Weld as his political mentor, and the politician that he most identified with.

Romney also despised Senator Jesse Helms, quote “My hope is that, after this election, it will be the moderates of both parties who will control the Senate, not the Jesse Helms”.


70 posted on 05/27/2012 12:48:55 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

71 posted on 05/27/2012 12:53:51 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

For conservative political activists, this is going to be a long, strange, election year.

For those of us who are locked outside of our normal patterns yet are passionate about politics, and even belong to forums, it is going to be a nightmare.


72 posted on 05/27/2012 1:02:46 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Agreed. This election is the ultimate “lose-lose” scenario.


73 posted on 05/27/2012 1:09:50 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
A third possibility, Judge Diane Sykes, is often mentioned as a likely Romney nominee if the next person to leave the Supreme Court is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court's senior woman justice.

It is absolutely pathetic that we now have permanent "diversity" seats on the Supreme Court.

74 posted on 05/27/2012 1:15:49 AM PDT by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It would be, but Reid appears to be the exception. Do you know about Jeff Flake?


75 posted on 05/27/2012 2:56:03 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Either Obama or Romney will assure that the SC remains a moral and constitutional wasteland.

We’re never going to get out courts back until we put the legislative branch into the hands of legislators who will impeach any judge speedily who transgresses his own legitimate powers or the Constitution.


76 posted on 05/27/2012 5:08:34 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Party like it's 1860.- America's Party - www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

The appointments would last about 20 years. How long would control of the senate last ? Probably not 20 years. I’m no Mitt fan at all, but he is a much better alternative than Obama.


77 posted on 05/27/2012 5:49:02 AM PDT by Carry me back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

While it’s nice to read something like this, isn’t it just a liiiiiiiiitle premature?

I mean there is the whole “finish the nomination process, select a VP, campaign and win an election and then have an actual opening on the Court” thing that needs to happen before we actually have this conversation for real....


78 posted on 05/27/2012 6:09:42 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Obama 2012: Dozens of MSNBC viewers can't be wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
On top of Obama's current list is:

1. His pal Bill Ayers

2. Stalin

3. Lenin

4. Mao

5. Hillary

6. Slick Willie

7. His wife (someone's gotta have a job come Jan 20, 2013

79 posted on 05/27/2012 6:15:34 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (He has Risen!!! If you do not know Him, this is the perfect week to seek Him out!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Would you rather Obama appoint 1, 2, or maybe 3?

Bryer will leave if Obama is reelected (he said so, as did Ginsburg)

that scares the S$$T out of me...not for myself, I am 75, hey can't hurt me...it's my grand children I am voting for....

If you say at home “pride” voters, think of your kids and grands...if you do not have any...thinks of the little ones that depend on “the grown ups”

80 posted on 05/27/2012 7:05:08 AM PDT by southphilly (Every State should be a RIGHT to WORK State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson