Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam
The Mitt-Haters will be here soon enough to tell us all that there is no reason to expect Romney’s appointments to be better than Obama’s.

Mitt had ample chance to appoint judges when he was a governor. Clearly, a look at those appointments should qualm any fears, right?

63 posted on 05/26/2012 9:44:09 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
OTOH, 12% of the voters in Mass. are Republican, so he was starting from a very weak position. Also, Mass. has a "Governor's Council" where every judicial nominee goes for approval - the democrats held 8 of 9 seats. Romney appointed 9 Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters (but all gave to democrats) and 14 democrats.

I'm surprised he was able to get even 9 republicans. Most were appointed to district court or clerk magistrate level where Romney was interested in appointing those who were tough on crime.

As far as the MSC, Romney appointed a conservative member of the Federalist Society, Christopher Moore, to chair the Judicial Nominating Commission. He kept the libs to a low roar.

I tried to look at a Redstate article regarding the picks but it isn't responding right now.

64 posted on 05/26/2012 10:52:17 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson