**************
Yo' Traitor Gadahn...
We have more than a little scorn for you and your ilk...
BTW...
FYI...
Heads-up....
The U.S. Marines have "an app for that"
*********
Posted on 05/04/2012 7:11:50 AM PDT by lowbridge
“We should also look for an American channel that can be close to being unbiased, such as CBS, or other channel that has political motives that make it interested in broadcasting the point of view of al Mujahadin,” Bin Laden wrote in one of the letters uncovered in the raid that killed him.
But one of his top aides, American-born Adam Gadahn, raged against coverage of the terror group on U.S. television. Gadahn believed that several of the American networks, in particular CNN, were “in cooperation with the government” —and saved much of his scorn for Fox News.
-snip
However, he also praised some of the networks, saying ABC “is all right; actually it could be one of the best channels, as far as we are concerned.”
And Gadahn, who is still at large, said he used to feel that MSNBC was “good and neutral” but expressed concern that it fired Keith Olbermann
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
He was right.
They did, and still do — air his, and anyone else’s anti-American propaganda!
Al queda and bin laden didn’t like Fox news. Could you think of a better endorsement for Fox news?
LOL! This reads like a satire, its great!
Osama/Obama
There is no difference in the two having their propaganda needs met by CBS
**************
Yo' Traitor Gadahn...
We have more than a little scorn for you and your ilk...
BTW...
FYI...
Heads-up....
The U.S. Marines have "an app for that"
*********
Now, that's funny!
He can air his propaganda from the fires of Hell, oh, sorry, he already is, but no one there cares.
Date is wrong. It should be may 3. Can that be fixed?
Yeah--Obama doesn't like it either.
That’s obama’s thinking also.
“the news is 90% of the preparation for the battle”
If you have a small scale attack you can carry out the attack based on what is in the news. For a large scale attack to achieve it's objective you have to orchestrate the news for the attack, then follow up the attack with the correct spin in the news.
Example- Tea Party is a bunch of right wing extremist, Tim McVeigh wanna-be’s, and low and behold there is a fertilizer car bomb attempt in NYC which just had to be the work of the Tea Party.
Care to take a guess which news organization didn't follow the dem talking points before and after that terrorist attempt?
“the news is 90% of the preparation for the battle”
If you have a small scale attack you can carry out the attack based on what is in the news. For a large scale attack to achieve it's objective you have to orchestrate the news for the attack, then follow up the attack with the correct spin in the news.
Example- Tea Party is a bunch of right wing extremist, Tim McVeigh wanna-be’s, and low and behold there is a fertilizer car bomb attempt in NYC which just had to be the work of the Tea Party.
Care to take a guess which news organization didn't follow the dem talking points before and after that terrorist attempt?
and the answer to any reporter from cbs abc msnbs ... “is this a question from the most beloved news organization of Osama Bin Ladin?”
SeeBS
What consitutes “good neutral coverage” for people who kill all dissenters?
Fox should run this as an advertisement and loop it until 2013.
CBS has a long record siding with the enemy. They proved to be a strong advocate for the Vietcong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.