Posted on 05/02/2012 11:22:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Mitt Romney: Judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.
Here's the proof.
Listen to the eight minute audio HERE .
*Excerpted from May 1, 2012 America's Summit, Restore the Republic call
The primary consisted of candidates, campaigns, voters and elections. It was a weak field and the notRomney opposition failed to unite around one candidate.
Blaming the party is nonsense. Supporting an even weaker candidate with even less unity does nothing to fix the problem, is a nonsensical, perhaps feel good, exercise.
Answer my question and I’ll answer yours.
The GOP never has a good candidate (Dole, McCain, Bush, etc.). I don’t know what these “principled” conservatives expected. If you only vote for the perfect conservative candidate, you will always get a liberal democrat.
1) Is America's Party a previously established party, or or you a one man party?
2) In how many states are you on the ballot?
3) Is this a write in campaign?
I have not decided yet who to vote for and you are definately under consideration.
How would you know?
I don’t see your actions as principled or moral, because the results are greater harm to the republic.
That's an amazing thing to say to someone simply because they won't support a pro-choice democrat.
Especially in light of the fact that you are saying it in support of said pro-choice democrat.
-- Isaiah 5:20"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"
Some choice. The only difference between those two, are their team jerseys.
And don't start with the, "well at least Romney doesn't hate this country!" His record in office was just as destructive to our basic American institutions and ideals, as any far left Democrat. He hasn't changed his spots, and will govern exactly like Obama, if given the chance.
The man is one of the biggest fraud we've ever witnessed, yet people are convincing themselves that because he's got an R fixed on his jacket, he's one of us.
Good lord....
Good grief. Martyr much?
America’s Party was founded four years ago. We have Affiliates in all fifty states.
I’m not ready to publicly talk about our ballot strategy as yet. Folks are working on it.
But, we can always use more help, if you’re willing.
It won’t be a write-in campaign if folks get off their duffs and work hard to get the job done.
Thanks for your consideration. I greatly appreciate it.
Funny. The boss agrees with Eternal Vigilance, not you. Seems to me it's you who oughta leave the board.
So you think he will abandon his platform entirely once elected, giving up any chance of re-election?
I do not want another Obama term. So I'll make you a deal. Give Romney a term and if he's just the same as Obama, I'll help you put Obama back in office in 2016.
Deal?
#1 this is pure utilitarian pragmatism ethics disguised as "morality" ... as if empowering an abortion healthcare mastermind like either Obama or Romney can be skewed by you to be "moral" conduct...
Tell you what...go dismember a few pre-born babies and then come back and try to spout how "moral" that action is...
Pathetic and lame.
#2...your portended "results are greater harm to the republic" might be true; might not be true.
Your phrasing here is always worth a mention on these threads (just not trying to embed them in anything "ethical").
The Q then becomes...are you speaking as a prophet here?
How do you know that God won't more immediately judge a nation of so-called "Christians" who don't mind endorsing, promoting, and elevating a man who claims to be a living embodiment of a rival god to THE God???
If somehow you think that God didn't tend to get more riled up over the spiritual adultery of His people -- than the pagans in the Old Testament -- then you haven't carefully read the OT.
[ Good grief. Martyr much? ]
The election is Kabuki Theater.. nobody actually dies.. its all drama..
except for, of course, the babies.. they die..
You have definite trollish qualities.
Are you premature, ahem, in other areas as well?
I think that's self-evident. Do you disagree?
Problem is I'm not granting you high moral ground just because you claim it - while acting in a manner that does not seriously consider the result of such actions.
If you had principle you would have opposed who seems to be your main opponent in the primary - where defeating him could, possibly, have actually done some good other than helping Obama. That would have been principled and courageous and require actual political skills to build a successful campaign.
Something more than this internet self-gratification.
It's not principled at all to do so, and I'm certainly not going to support your personal party in some act of self perceived self-righteous suicide that only furthers the power of the current. No thanks.
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his."
- George S. Patton
Sorry, can’t join you in your own drama. I can give up anytime.
I’m claiming to still be alive and kicking thus far.
"We"??? Who's "we"? You and your dog?
know
You don't know jack shit, n00b.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.