Just like in Russia.........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Since when has Pelosi ever cared about “all that Constitution stuff”
To: Sub-Driver
Shameless thread highjack:
To: rightly_dividing
One dollar per month would cover everything if 10% of our readers would reliably put it up.
39 posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:10:05 PM by Jim Robinson (There’s no crying in rebellion!!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2874129/posts?page=39
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
Dems miss the media monopoly days. Back before the rubes could talk back.
Back when the NYTimes could write a story, and then decide which disagreeing “letter to the editor” to publish.
Public discourse is so much more civil when you control both sides of the argument.
32 posted on
04/19/2012 3:01:52 PM PDT by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Sub-Driver
Those are fighting words, WE HAVE YET BEGUN TO FIGHT!!
34 posted on
04/19/2012 3:11:37 PM PDT by
jesseam
To: Sub-Driver
Nancy is an idiot! She’s only doing this ‘cause the RATS don’t control the House. And won’t control the Senate after November.
35 posted on
04/19/2012 3:11:49 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
To: Sub-Driver
While we are at it Nancy, let’s revise or do away with a few other Amendments.
Let’s start with the 16th. ABOLISH IT.
F U N P!
F U B O!
F U D P!
37 posted on
04/19/2012 3:30:41 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: Sub-Driver
Please, someone AMEND her.
39 posted on
04/19/2012 3:49:35 PM PDT by
TribalPrincess2U
(Anyone not wanting an ID or purple thumb to vote isn't worthy of voting privilege.)
To: Sub-Driver
When was the last time a Minority (or Speaker) Leader suggested changing the Bill of Rights? Another, in the long list of things the GOP must run on this year.
40 posted on
04/19/2012 3:51:07 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(Obama is afraid if he needs to start a fight with Catholics. He's losing the women's vote!!!)
To: Sub-Driver
Isn’t Al Sharpton’s National Action Network a (nonprofit) corporation?
42 posted on
04/19/2012 3:53:19 PM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
To: Sub-Driver
I'm going to refrain from giving this post a serious reply. If I did reply, I would probably be visited and grilled, cuffed & roughed up NLT sundown, by the FBI, Secret Service, House and Senate Sgt's-at-Arms, Interpol, CIA, NASCAR, RCA, USMC, USN, USAF, USA, USCG, NAACP, DNC, DSC, CBC, BSA, GSA, ANA, Harry Reids sister-in-law, Chuck Schumers boy friend, Dick Durbin's hair dresser, Hillary Clintons' NEW Colombian girlfriend, WKRG in Cincinnati and the American Rocky Road Ice Cream Assn (A.R.R.I.C.A.). I'd have to call my local sheriff to come out to direct traffic and Ted Nuggent's grand kids to sell lemonade in my front yard.
Therefore.....bttt
43 posted on
04/19/2012 3:53:33 PM PDT by
jmax
To: Sub-Driver
Corporations are incapable of speaking. They hire people who speak for them. So there is no way to restrict corporate speech, because it doesn’t exist.
47 posted on
04/19/2012 4:48:18 PM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Sub-Driver
Political speech, by anyone, is the exact speech that the First Amendment protects.
The founding fathers didn't create it to protect porn.
48 posted on
04/19/2012 5:18:22 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(For every black person murdered by a white, thirty-nine white people are murdered by blacks.)
To: Sub-Driver
Nanzi Pelozi flashes her Swastika for her adoring crowds again.
49 posted on
04/19/2012 5:19:16 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: Sub-Driver
The Founders of the US foresaw assholes like Pelosi. That’s one of the reasons why, although they couldn’t predict the future, they included a provision to amend the Constitution while making it difficult to amend it at the same time.
Such decisions should not be made lightly or at the whim of current fads, or by leftist air-heads.
51 posted on
04/19/2012 5:43:19 PM PDT by
Smber
(The smallest minority is the individual. Get the government off my back.)
To: Sub-Driver
OK Nan. But if you REALLY want to go down that road, don’t you think you ought to repeal the 2nd Amendment first?
To: Sub-Driver
Can anyone in Washington find the OFF button on Pelosi?
To: Sub-Driver
Will you folks in San FRancisco please put us out of our misery?
Madam Pelousy needs to be retired in 2012!
58 posted on
04/19/2012 6:41:55 PM PDT by
Taxman
(So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
To: Sub-Driver
62 posted on
04/19/2012 8:41:39 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: Sub-Driver
This proves that the left is now becoming more open about their true agenda- to stifle free speech.
Obviously San Fran Nan knows this could never pass either House, but instead is trying to score cheap political points to fire up the base for Hussein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson