Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/13/2012 10:18:30 AM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Josh Painter

Because he’s not Mitt Romney.


2 posted on 04/13/2012 10:19:18 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

ABO and ABR

and... they aren’t considering Newt.


3 posted on 04/13/2012 10:20:52 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Believe me, not all of us were


5 posted on 04/13/2012 10:22:15 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Because he is about 3 times more conservative than Mitt Romney.


6 posted on 04/13/2012 10:23:01 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

I never understood the appeal of Santorum. He is a big-government social conservative and he’s never managed or governed.


7 posted on 04/13/2012 10:25:18 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Because anyone who has well defined beliefs and views will attract the attention of others who have well defined beliefs and views over someone who doesn’t hold any convictions. Even if you don’t agree with them on everything.


11 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:11 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

In brief, he spoke our language.

Perry was my number one, after that I switched to Newt. But many in my circle of friends loved Santorum, and it’s because what he says resonates with them. He resonated with me, too, but I preferred Newt, just barely.


13 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:48 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

I wasn’t “so enamored of him”— ever. Given my ABO stance, however, I’d have voted for him.


14 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:48 AM PDT by Clara Lou (ABO! ABO! ABO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter
Because many of us did not want to support the only other option to Mitt: A man who cheated on two wives before moving onto his third, endorsed Dede Scuzzyfavor, did global warming ads with Pelosi, and called those who wanted to enforce immigration laws on long time illegals "inhumane"...resulting in Jim Rob himself to post FUNG, and FUNG. Many on FR saw Newt as the only way top stop Mitt. Others saw Rick as the only way to stop Mitt. Mitt just sat back and laughed as the conservative vote was divided.
15 posted on 04/13/2012 10:31:25 AM PDT by icwhatudo (Tax codes and spending don't get 14 year olds pregnant and on welfare. Morality Matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum wasn’t even close to ready for prime time.

After what he said about Zimmerman he has no business at any level of government.


16 posted on 04/13/2012 10:32:20 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum was, is, and always will be a joke.

It was all about stopping Romney.


18 posted on 04/13/2012 10:32:30 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

>>the simple truth is that to the extent that manufacturing jobs were ever glorious (a big reach on its own

I’m sure the folks at Forbes cannot understand this, but factory jobs are not glorious and no ever said they were. However, they were a way for a high school graduate with a work ethic to make a good living for his family, possibly sending the children to college so they could migrate to the big city and look down their noses at factory workers.

I am so sick of elitist snobbery on both sides of the RepubliCrat parties who worked so hard this election destroying every conservative candidate (and some almost-rans and shoulda-rans) reducing us to the Newt-Santorum-Romney choice.


20 posted on 04/13/2012 10:34:48 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

ABR.


29 posted on 04/13/2012 10:44:55 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

My guess is because he was the most religious candidate. Not the best candidate. That would be Newt.


30 posted on 04/13/2012 10:45:04 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't go wobbly on me now Newt. You're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

because he was a lot better than Mitt Romney


40 posted on 04/13/2012 11:00:33 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

“seemingly so opposite of conservative”

His ACU rating was higher than most other Republicans in the House while he was there. Let me guess the person who wrote this will back liberal Romney to the hilt.


44 posted on 04/13/2012 11:09:36 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum will make a comeback when 90% of children are born out of wedlock, gay weddings are in 50 states, crime is considered equal opportunity, and no middle class jobs are available.


45 posted on 04/13/2012 11:12:45 AM PDT by ex-snook ("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum relates to us on an emotional level. He shares our frustrations about cultural rot. He laments the loss of good paying jobs that undergirded American families in decades past. Some of this was unavoidable, but many companies left our shores b/c of high taxes and austere regulations. He is the antithesis of an internationalist, and people such as the Forbes folks can’t relate to the anger of people toward companies and government who used their sacrifices in wars to survive and thrive. These same entities now explain from their ivory towers that manufacturing job losses are fine, b/c WE would be the people who would manage the FINANCING of products made elsewhere. What we see today is the difference between a living, vibrant human, and one gutted and stuffed by a taxidermist. THAT is why Santorum is so loved by the people who *get* what he is saying. Bob


48 posted on 04/13/2012 11:27:08 AM PDT by alstewartfan ( 27 of 36 Romney judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Because if a candidate says “GOD” or “JESUS” at anytime during their campaign, the truly gullible will only hear those two words, not look at what they did while in office nor listen to what they are saying. Just those two words uttered from a slick politican put about 30% of those that call themselves conservatives into a deep sleep... kinda like hypnosis...


54 posted on 04/13/2012 11:37:10 AM PDT by joe fonebone (If you vote for the lesser of two evils, you are still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter
That investors no longer value factory work explains why they migrated to China

No, it doesn't. A government war on manufacturing explains it. You may not like Santorum trying to pick winners and losers, but someone needs to take a hard look at the government imposed policies that drive manufacturing out and start clearing out the regultory weeds that has made this a hostile place to try and do anything.

Given the choice to build your factory in California, say, a place where they don't want you, and country "x" where they do want you, you can't be blamed for considering the move. Santorum wanted to solve that problem.

And whoever is the next president, we'd better solve it. When you ship your manufacturing abroad, jobs and technological competence goes with it.

60 posted on 04/13/2012 12:03:46 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson