To: WPaCon; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; BillyBoy; ...
I admit, I’ve been impressesd by their architecture and pottery, and some of their cuisine, as well. They’re still a culture of bloodthirsty troglodytes.
5 posted on
04/01/2012 1:57:41 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Clintonfatigued
I agree.
For example, the Taj Mahal is very impressive.
To me, Islamic architecture and most other traditional architectural styles are more aesthetically appealing than modern and postmodern architecture.
7 posted on
04/01/2012 2:02:18 PM PDT by
WPaCon
To: Clintonfatigued; WPaCon
wp--> as James pointed out in post 6, the Taj Mahal was based on north Indian Hindu architecture
Wpa--> the architecture is mostly from before Islam --> for example the various arches etc. in La Mesquita are from Byzantine art. Cuisine -- that is pre-Islamic mostly....
33 posted on
04/01/2012 9:18:09 PM PDT by
Cronos
(Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
To: Clintonfatigued
A lot of the art is nice, artichtecure. Ottoman calligraphy.
Food? No thanks.
38 posted on
04/02/2012 5:36:07 PM PDT by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Drivel....you extrapolate erronously
85 posted on
04/04/2012 4:31:24 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson