Posted on 04/01/2012 11:27:17 AM PDT by Java4Jay
Im having great difficulty locating the original full version of Zimmermans call to police, one that is not enhanced to make wind noise sound like a racial slur.
I just completely refuted on of your two "key" pieces of evidence. Your position is now half as secure as it was moments ago.
“A few days ago two black men knocked on the door of a womans house two blocks from me. She didnt answer the door. They went around back and broke out a window. The woman pushed the panic button causing the alarm to go off. The two men jumped in their car and sped away
That woman was lucky. These victims were not so lucky.
145 white victims murdered in their own homes by invading black thugs:
http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/2012_03_01_archive.html
"I believe that's Trayvon Martin in the background, without a doubt," Primeau says, stressing that the tone of the voice is a giveaway. "That's a young man screaming."
This judgment is from a man who has never heard Trayvon Martin's voice. The other expert found a 48% match, which, by published standards, is "inconclusive."
But what about the witness who both heard and saw Zimmerman yelling for help?
Why do you believe a citizen of a community does not have the right to confront someone who is trespassing/traveling through (depending on your point of view) that citizen’s community?
I think ANYONE is allowed to ask ANYONE "Wazzup?" at ANYTIME
I still don’t get what you are trying to say. In a struggle over a weapon the round could have gone off up/down/left/right who knows....yes the trajectory into the body would be determined by the ME but I’ve yet to read that there was an exit wound.
The software compared that audio to Zimmerman’s voice. It returned a 48 percent match. Owen said to reach a positive match with audio of this quality, he’d expect higher than 90 percent. As a result of that, you can say with reasonable scientific certainty that it’s not Zimmerman.
Owen says, stressing that he cannot confirm the voice as Trayvon’s, because he didn’t have a sample of the teen’s voice to compare.
48% match is inconclusive, what is the match to Trayvon?
He was the Neighborhood Watch, No subordinates, No superiors, No promotions board, No oversight, No control.
By calling him Captain Zimmerman you are just pantering to his fantasy of being a CaptainOnPatrol.
If someone who comes out from under a bridge is called a troll, what is some one who comes out from a sewer called? Inquiring minds want to know.
That you could come to this conclusion is astounding; that you could use the phrase "scientific certainty" in the same statement is incredibly astounding.
I have never had to yell "Help!" in a panicked mode, so I have absolutely no idea what my pitch might be.
But I DO know it would not be in my normal speaking voice.
It's a little different. In one case, there is enough evidence to analyze, and the analysis is inconclusive. But here, by the standards of the profession, there isn't even enough evidence to analyze. By the expert's own standards, it's inappropriate to bring this analytical tool to bear on the question.
-- I'm not sure why an "audio forensic expert" would be needed at all. I do understand how the story feeds the sensationalism of the reporting. --
That's it, that's the reason. And, if this gets to a law court, to attempt to undermine the eyewitness - but I think the testimony is inadmissible in court, because, by the expert's own standards, he cannot form an opinion. Therefore, he has nothing to add to getting to the truth of the matter.
Outside of the courtroom, he is free to blow smoke and direct away from the truth - that's what he's getting paid to do.
Heh! Stripe <3!!
I am doing my best to remain civilized, and it is really, really difficult.
I think I’m just going to sip this coffee and listen to some more music.
The fact that the lead homicide investigator on this case recommended that charges be filed against Zimmerman is all that I need to hear. What else is there to say?
You are a complete moron that repeats things over and over while ignoring the very answers you seek. What else is there to say?
Homicide investigators are not the final judges as to whether or not the events that transpired rise to the level of prosecutable offenses. The prosecutor in this case declined to file charges.
Well, if you cherry pick that one item, and base your conclusion on that one item, then of course you reach the conclusion you do. It becomes the only possible outcome.
I'd like to read what Serino had to say, but it's not available to the public.
I haven’t twisted anything. I think you’ve pretty clearly misunderstood a lot of things that you’ve read, or simply accepted sensationalized headlines instead of evaluating the facts presented on their own merits.
We may yet learn some new information that contradicts Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense. To date, there has been none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.