Skip to comments.
Current Communist Goals
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 ^
Posted on 03/17/2012 9:13:20 AM PDT by Antoninus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
It is appalling to see how many useful idiots there are on Free Republic these days. It's one thing to attack a candidate like Rick Santorum for his record and his occasional less-than-conservative votes. It's another thing completely to attack him for his conservative and laudable defense of the American family. By doing this, you are joining the ranks of the amoral enemy and abetting the activities of those in news, academia, and the toxic entertainment media.
1
posted on
03/17/2012 9:13:56 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
To: Antoninus
2
posted on
03/17/2012 9:17:18 AM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
To: Antoninus
3
posted on
03/17/2012 9:18:20 AM PDT
by
unkus
(Silence Is Consent)
To: Joe 6-pack
Hat tip to you, my friend.
4
posted on
03/17/2012 9:19:10 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
To: volunbeer
5
posted on
03/17/2012 9:19:25 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: Antoninus
Its frightening how far they’ve gotten.
We have to fight on all fronts rather than concentrating on one or two.
6
posted on
03/17/2012 9:19:32 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: volunbeer
In my opinion, if the Republican party nominates Mitt Romney, goal #15 will have finally been accomplished.
7
posted on
03/17/2012 9:20:20 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
To: Antoninus
Thank you sir. I would only qualify that where you say, “While some of the goals on this list are out-of-date historically speaking,” the reason for their obsolescence is because some of those goals have already been accomplished.
8
posted on
03/17/2012 9:26:31 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Antoninus
“It’s another thing completely to attack him for his conservative and laudable defense of the American family. By doing this, you are joining the ranks of the amoral enemy and abetting the activities of those in news, academia, and the toxic entertainment media.”
I have seen this quite a bit lately. I don’t expect all FReepers to be christians, but to attack a candidate for being a devout christian, or a devout Jew is sick. Many of our societal problems emanate from the breakdown of the American family. We need more politicians to speak up about this, not less!
9
posted on
03/17/2012 9:35:07 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: Raider Sam; gogogodzilla; Ozymandias Ghost; going hot; sillsfan; wastedyears; Longbow1969; ...
At least understand what you are defending and whose rhetoric you are using when you claim that a duly elected government has no right to restrict obscenity.
10
posted on
03/17/2012 9:41:04 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
To: Antoninus
Sorry FRiend but the majority of the GOP sold out long ago. They have been Progressive Lite for so long that most right thinking American’s don’t recognize we are the frog in the boiling pot of water.
Cultural conservatism was essential to blunt the goals of the left, but we have moved so far to the left that the defense of cultural values (even here on FR) is subject to ridicule and scorn. The replacement of God and self-reliance with government is pretty much complete on a national scale and it’s probably too late to reverse the trend.
“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholely inadequate for the governance of any other.” - John Adams in 1798
11
posted on
03/17/2012 9:48:15 AM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
To: Antoninus
>>At least understand what you are defending and whose rhetoric you are using when you claim that a duly elected government has no right to restrict obscenity.<<
???
Is this a carry-over from the other thread about Santorum and obscenity?
12
posted on
03/17/2012 9:48:55 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
I have seen this quite a bit lately. I dont expect all FReepers to be christians, but to attack a candidate for being a devout christian, or a devout Jew is sick.
They've succumbed to the left and are no longer relevant to my brand of conservatism. If they have something intelligent to say, I'll listen and consider it but they're no more conservative than Christopher Hitchens was.
In fact I can name a whole host of problems that actual conservatives of all stripes have.
13
posted on
03/17/2012 9:49:48 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: 21twelve; Absolutely Nobama; AFPhys; afraidfortherepublic; AmericanInTokyo; ...
Pinging the Santorum list to this. Personally, I think the media/left has once again stepped in it by trying to make Santorum the equivalent of the Taliban for daring to say he will enforce existing laws against obscenity.
50%+ of potential voters are women. How many of them would favor Santorum's position on obscenity?
The problem with the left is that they are surrounded by morbidly perverse people and don't understand that the vast majority of the people in this country do not think like they do on the subject.
Santorum for President ping. Let me know if you want on or off the list.
Top 10 Reasons why Conservatives should support Santorum
16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be a Really, Really Bad President
14
posted on
03/17/2012 9:49:57 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
To: Antoninus; WmShirerAdmirer; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
15
posted on
03/17/2012 9:49:57 AM PDT
by
narses
To: volunbeer
Cultural conservatism was essential to blunt the goals of the left, but we have moved so far to the left that the defense of cultural values (even here on FR) is subject to ridicule and scorn. The replacement of God and self-reliance with government is pretty much complete on a national scale and its probably too late to reverse the trend.
It's never too late. As long as there is life, there is hope. God will provide.
16
posted on
03/17/2012 9:53:09 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
To: Antoninus
If theRepublican Party has their way,Romney will be the nominee.
17
posted on
03/17/2012 9:54:15 AM PDT
by
sport
To: Antoninus
"As long as there is life, there is hope." If that's not a direct quote, it's a very close paraphrase from one of James Herriott's books :-) I just don't recall which one at the moment.
18
posted on
03/17/2012 10:02:41 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Antoninus; cripplecreek
“The problem with the left is that they are surrounded by morbidly perverse people and don’t understand that the vast majority of the people in this country do not think like they do on the subject.”
Of course. They live in NYC, or Hollywood, and only talk to their own kind. The real values of most Americans is lost on them.
19
posted on
03/17/2012 10:07:49 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: sport
If theRepublican Party has their way,Romney will be the nominee.
There is still time to make sure they don't have their way.
20
posted on
03/17/2012 10:09:28 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(The less virtuous a people, the greater its need for laws.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson