Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FoxNews Chicago IL GOP Poll (Romney 37% Santorum 31% Newt 14%)
Fox Chicago News ^ | 03-16-2012 | Mike Flannery

Posted on 03/16/2012 7:57:55 AM PDT by parksstp

Chicago - The Republican race for president looks like a two-man contest in Illinois Thursday night.

Mitt Romney is ahead of Rick Santorum among Illinois Republicans, even after Santorum’s big victories in Alabama and Mississippi on Tuesday. But Santorum is within striking distance for next Tuesday's primary.

An exclusive FOX Chicago News poll found a six point lead for Romney among those likely to vote in the March 20 presidential primary.

Romney had the support of 37 percent on Wednesday. Rick Santorum earned 31 percent of the vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxchicago.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigideasnewt; bitternewt; dumbideasrick; gingrich; il2012; moonstrucknewt; newt4romney; pornburnerricky; proillegalsrick; prounionsrick; rick4anticondomczar; ricksezbanspanish; rickseziwillbanporn; romney; santorum; votenewtgetmitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Like IA, Mid/Downstate IL is seeing population decreases. Theoretically, there's about 50 counties Santorum can take. He probably has to win each of those by 500-1000 votes to offset northern IL (have him down 30,000 votes in Cook, 12,000 in lake), etc, but even then, there's probably not enough conservatives in the state. He's probably topped at 37-38% and Romney will be junst under 45%, with Newt around 7 or 8, and Paul the rest.
1 posted on 03/16/2012 7:58:00 AM PDT by parksstp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: parksstp
Looks like Ohio. Big surprise. Not sure what Gingrich is doing, but it's still obvious he can't go north while Santorum can go south. One thing in Santorum's favor is most of Romney's supporters aren't that enthusiastic to begin with and now they've been told for weeks that Romney is inevitable, so they may not show. Romney should be careful trying to bluff people out of the race by contending he's inevitable, because voters won't show for him if they are convinced of that.
2 posted on 03/16/2012 8:08:07 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

The Newtbots, nonetheless, will stick with Newt because Rick Santorum has minor imperfections as a conservative and Newt has none.


3 posted on 03/16/2012 8:08:07 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

I hate to say it, but it’s time for Newt and Paul to drop out.


4 posted on 03/16/2012 8:08:53 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; Lazlo in PA; writer33; cripplecreek; antonius; Brices Crossroads

ping!


5 posted on 03/16/2012 8:09:43 AM PDT by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Whatever. If Romney can’t crack 50% in a state like Illinois when he is calling himself the inevitable candidate, he has SERIOUS problems.


6 posted on 03/16/2012 8:14:24 AM PDT by Thunder90 (Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Since Rick has out performed the polls time and again, try a magic eight ball for predictions.


7 posted on 03/16/2012 8:18:15 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Politics as usual fools the American electorate one more time.


8 posted on 03/16/2012 8:18:46 AM PDT by gitmogrunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

This looks like the state where the split conservative vote can do some of the most damage.

This state is direct delegate election by district. That means just like with Clinton/Bush/Perot, whichever candidates’ delegates get the most votes in that district win. They don’t need 50% or a majority, just the highest amount of votes. Romney will walk away with all 69 delegates if this poll holds across all counties. Yet if Newt’s votes went to Rick, Rick would walk away with all 69 delegates.

Losing this state’s delegates is a loss we probably can’t afford to take if we want to stop Romney from winning the nomination. There will probably be no contested convention if he gets more than half of the Illinois delegates. Every single delegate counts and given all the upcoming states Romney is guaranteed to do strong in, we need to win these “swing” states decisively to beat him.


9 posted on 03/16/2012 8:22:21 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
it’s time for Newt and Paul to drop out...

for the good of the nation.

10 posted on 03/16/2012 8:24:24 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: parksstp; Lazlo in PA; Antoninus
Get it straight Newtsters: Sheldon Adelson has taken you for suckers.
11 posted on 03/16/2012 8:27:02 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

“I hate to say it, but it’s time for Newt and Paul to drop out.”

Agreed. At this juncture, they’ve made their points and only ego is causing them to ‘hang on’.


12 posted on 03/16/2012 8:29:36 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Stop feeding the beast; spend money only with those who support traditional American values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Illinois is being bombarded with massive pro-Romney robocalls, media ads, and glowing commentary on even the “conservative” talk radio station. The only thing mentioning Santorum or Gingrich is highly negative. I have not heard a single positive ANYTHING from or about Santorum. NOTHING.


13 posted on 03/16/2012 8:48:52 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp
He probably has to win each of those by 500-1000 votes to offset northern IL (have him down 30,000 votes in Cook, 12,000 in lake),

I live in Ogle County, northern IL around, and even in, Rockford is going Santorum.

Not all of northern IL is greater Chicago.
14 posted on 03/16/2012 9:10:51 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Romney will walk away with all 69 delegates if this poll holds across all counties. Yet if Newt’s votes went to Rick, Rick would walk away with all 69 delegates.

False assumption. Outside of greater Chicago and maybe Champaign and Peoria, the rest of the state votes like Nebraska or Indiana. Romney will probably crack 50% in Chicago. He won't crack 30% in large swaths of the downstate and NW area.
15 posted on 03/16/2012 9:14:41 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
I have not heard a single positive ANYTHING from or about Santorum. NOTHING.

My wife and kids just saw him 2 hours ago at the Rockford Holiday Inn. He's crossing the state in a bus today. It is true that he has no money for an air war, which makes his wins and close calls more impressive.
16 posted on 03/16/2012 9:17:50 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

It seems that Newton is again playing the role of Perot. Is Perot one of his contributors, or is Perot with Obama?


17 posted on 03/16/2012 9:25:29 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm pretty sure the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Romney doesn’t have to get 50 percent anywhere, does he? It’s delegates that count, and he has the inside track, with Newton helping Romney.


18 posted on 03/16/2012 9:27:24 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm pretty sure the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Is IL Mormon friendly? Is Nauvoo still a Mormon enclave?


19 posted on 03/16/2012 9:29:05 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm pretty sure the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Feels like it though.

In 08, Romney ran well in the Quads area and along the MO/IL border counties. However, it’s hard to tell what support is actually still intact because at the time, he was garnering a strong Anti-McCain vote.

Turnout will be key. If it’s low in the North, Santorum may not have to make up as much as Romney did when he was blown out by McCain.

If Rockford is truly purple (CNN’s Santorum color), then Santorum will be in good shape. I have my doubts about that area though.


20 posted on 03/16/2012 9:32:20 AM PDT by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson