Forgerygate: Ignoring Arpaio's report is a scandal in itself

s President Obama’s birth certificate a forgery? Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., believes it is. He recently held a press conference in Phoenix to discuss the findings of a new 10-page report. Mr. Arpaio’s investigators have come to a stunning conclusion: The long-form birth certificate Mr. Obama released last year is a “computer-generated forgery.”

With the exception of The Washington Times, however, no major U.S. media outlet reported this bombshell story. The liberal press corps is desperately trying to suppress any discussion of Forgerygate — potentially one of the biggest scandals in American history. The media class is betraying its fundamental mission to pursue the truth.

“Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,”

The Washington Times story, written by Stephen Dinan, points out that Mr. Arpaio has called for Congress to investigate the matter. Think about this: A high-profile sheriff orders a team of former law enforcement officials to examine whether the president is truly a natural born citizen and that he has the constitutional and legal right to occupy the White House. Their official report is that Mr. Obama’s documents are shoddy and he likely engaged in deliberate fraud. And yet, most of the American press corps doesn’t believe this is an important news story? The liberal media has become rotten to the core.

Ironically, the foreign press reported widely on the story. For example, Pravda — that’s right, the former official organ of the Soviet Communist Party — did an extensive analysis of Mr. Arpaio’s findings. The article by Dianna Cotter asks the obvious question: What are U.S. journalists afraid of?

Read more at: http://times247.com/articles/forgerygate-ignoring-arpaio-s-report-is-a-scandal-in-itself

There are FOUR items displayed in the POM, not just ONE. I did an actual survey by inquiring of selected post offices throughout the country regarding what their round dates looked like when applied by any of the various devices they had on hand.

I got hundreds of different items in, and found only those more typical of the lot than every possible item.

So what are you talking about? Are you disputing what I put in that manual?

I think your problem is you imagine every post office everywhere in the country does everything exactly the same way with exactly the same equipment.

They don't ~ and that's a problem. There are variations. Let's use APCs for one. I developed the designs for the first 24 APCs. The POD Transportation department purchased them. We put them to work immediately and displaced 24 people.

That's an incredible ROI. The APCs turned into a series of regional designs ranging from the ERMC to to things without names, but they all had the same wheels ~ kinda. I always kept an eye on that on my travels, and my original design specs were pretty close but people would buy wheels as much as 1/2 inch larger or 1/2 inch smaller ~ INTOLERABLE!!!

When I retired there were well over 1,000,000 APCs or very similar items. Keep the wheels on them and they can work for centuries.

Now, regarding what was available for year date inserts, your experience in one place in USPS is simply not determinantive. Somebody needs to do a survey ~ find out what they actually used (not just what one spec said to use).

Ok granny, I see you have some problems comprehending English. Again, Which of the "many" RDS stamps does Obamas postmark look like? Does it not look like obliterator 570 which has a standardized part number and engineering drawing and standardized 4 digit year date inserts of certain dimensions, hardness etc, or it it something else?

What about the two other postmarks from the Makiki Station are they not postmarked by the 570 obliterator? Now look at the other postmarks on the Cold Case Video what stamped them? Oval stamps?

still no answer on my donation? Do you retract your statement that anyone could have registerd for Obie at other than a PO?

What YOU put in the manual is not the question, so quit trying to be so "impotant", show me a 2 digit year stamp in a 570 besides Obamas. You do realize that this constitutes probable cause and there is significantly more evidence that can be found, such ss the original document or microfilm of it and whether the film is missing, cut, inserted or in the original roll and aged like the rest of the roll, just like his supposed BC. How many window clerks worked at Makiki in 1980? Are you familiar with Postal Service employee records, directives. training etc?

There's NO probable cause of anything here. What you are attempting to do is show that someone at Selective Service created a document "recently" to show that Obama had registered for the draft back in 1980.

You need more than a form with an anomalous date bar. All you have at the moment is something that falls in the category of "sh(+ happens".

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.