Posted on 03/14/2012 8:11:54 AM PDT by scripter
Edited on 03/14/2012 8:23:14 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
A stunning challenge has been issued in the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and it comes from a lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Ariz. Ads by Google
Arpaio’s team of volunteer professional law enforcement officers and attorneys concluded after a six-month investigation that there is probable cause that forgery and fraud were committed in the process through which Obama released a “Certificate of Live Birth” image at the White House last year.
I agree with everything you say. I have been following. The many discrepancies surrounding Barak for years. The multiple names, SSn’s and silence about his origins are troubling. We can be assured. That a massive cover up has occurred. The major players in the Third Estate are criminally complicate.
WND needs to tighten up. To not hold WND accountable for years of poor journalistic standards does them no favors. They do the work that CBS won’t typically do. I want them to be credible. They need to tighten. Up.
It was Olbermann? I didn’t realize it was Olbermann but glad to hear it.
Bump! Thanks for that!
Stated by editor-surveyor
“to you due to your anti-american, and anti-christian bias.”
Awwww.. I really thought you knew me better than that editor! I won’t jump on you for the not so nice comment though. Maybe you could review what I write before making such a silly statement!
Wow.... o.k. I should have really gone over and read that and watched the video before my statement. Thanks tomkat!
That is really, really awesome!
Actually, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Waiving it is your priviledge.
Sorry if I’m not too keen on WND. And yes, I should have at least gone over there and viewed the video before jumping the gun.
But, I have to admit your statement hurt big time and I am trying to be nice about it since that couldn’t be farther from the truth. I just don’t care for WND... That does not make me anti-American/anti-christian.
I guess that’s the best I can do to yell at you for that statement. I don’t care to be confrontational! And I like you, so I’m at a loss!
If you don’t care for WND, who do you care for?
There is no other news source that tells us the truth.
There is no other news source that is unabashedly Biblically Christian.
Freerepublic
Breibart, Leo, Butterzillion, Starwise, Fred Nerks, and so, so many others here that I trust in what they write.
I will try to give WND another chance!
If you are running windows, keepvid works great. I’ve never had any problems with it.
You’re welcome .. cheers
The latest legislative effort in Arizona to confront Obama’s eligibility would require political parties to file an affidavit swearing under penalty of perjury that their presidential and vice presidential candidates are qualified to hold the positions. It also would let any voter in Arizona file a lawsuit challenging an affidavit.
If it were to get the governor’s signature, the requirements of the bill would apply to this year’s presidential contest.
Breibart, Leo, Butterzillion, Starwise, Fred Nerks, and so, so many others here have to get the news somewhere, and if it comes from the Mediots, it needs lots of filtering.
With WND, all that is needed is to disregard the exhuberence occasionally.
And now we have the freaks out in full force. Pray for the Sheriff and his family.
A man described as a President Barack Obama fanatic pleads guilty to threatening to kill Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com//dpp/news/justice/man-pleads-guilty-to-threatening-arpaio-03142012
It is a CBS affiliate, but the station KPHO is not owned & operated by CBS. The station is owned by a company based in Iowa. CBS News had nothing to do with reporting this story.
Even if it were Gov. Brewer's position that questioning this President's eligibility is a "bridge too far", does that mean she would veto a generic bill for all AZ candidates because it could apply to Barry as well?
Gee, the reader was misled here, eh!? AP's use of words like "debunked", "controversy", etc. is so loaded with bias that I find the article hard to read.
Innuendo about a lead investigator writing a book is all but supposed to cause us to find him guilty of lying, right?
The AP says Arapio "generated a political firestorm" when it's clearly been the response that has been the firestorm, from Obama and the DOJ. That's obviously misleading the reader.
Ptui, pfui, AP!
HF
There is either:
(a)No Birth Certificate, as was reported by Governor Abercrombie
or (b) Documentation does exist, but it contains information detrimental to Obama.
Hawaii was notorious for falsely obtained "Home Birth" Certificates. For many decades, Asians and other foreigners showed up in Hawaii with children ... some fully grown ...for whom they obtained Hawaiian Birth Certificates and thus a claim to American Citizenship, by merely attesting to the birth of that child "at home," and providing witnesses.
Dr. Corsi picked up on that fact and surmised that this was what Grandmother Dunham had done for baby Barack. Of course, all of the evasions of Team Obama and Hawaiian officialdom make this explanation of events seem quite plausible. Dr. Corsi went to Kenya to see if he could find documentation of Obama's birth there, but succeeded only in placing his life in jeopardy. Those are the facts upon which his particular "Birther" case has been built, and they are real.
Bottom line: Obama has not proven he was born in Hawaii to a huge number of eminently reasonable people. However, equally true, those people are unable to disprove it. Huge legal and bureaucratic roadblocks have been placed in their path.
In the meantime, seemingly in response to the Trump challenge caused by skepticism over earlier document releases, the WH presented a digitally created document, actually a copy of an abstract of "data on file at the HIDOH," reproduced on paper stock selected to look like an actual Birth Certificate and purporting to be a "Certified copy of a Birth Certificate on file at the HIDOH," which it most emphatically is not. Unfortunately, the MSM, elected Republican Representatives, and a substantial number of Americans DO accept it as proof of "Birth in Hawaii," and consider the case closed. Then there are the questions of the obviously irregular selective Service Registration, and an SSN that will not activate the Federal ID system.
But these problems, although they are enough to cause any reasonable state AG to take Obama of the ballot, pale in comparison to the "Natural Born Citizen" issue. The failure of the SCOTUS to take the opportunity to resolve this issue brought before it on numerous occasions is inexplicable to me. Three justices have asked, 4 are needed.
With WND, all that is needed is to disregard the exhuberence occasionally.
Despite being a genuine Harvard Man, Dr. Corsi's prose is a direct swipe of the Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys School of breathless adolescent staged excitement and goes on for page after circularly reasoned page. Not bad, considering the whole opus is build upon a couple of facts, which although true, could certainly be more succinctly stated.
Of course, for the good Dr., the issue of "Natural Born Citizenship" always seems an afterthought to the "shocking exposés" of the forgeries that are his stock in trade. But the eccentricities of WND are not the culprit. Official America, especially at the state level, has simply failed to fulfill specific state constitutional mandates to establish the eligibility of candidates for national office. The Federal Constitution establishes the rules of eligibility, but did not spell out a mechanism for their enforcement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.