Romney's 'constitutional bungling' criticized (07/12/2007)

World Net Daily ^ | 07/12/2007 at 1:00 AM

[SoConPubbie]

Nearly two dozen family values activists have written to National Review, criticizing the publication for “puff” reporting of Gov. Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign that ignores his “constitutional bungling” of the court decision that led to same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.

The letter was dispatched by Sandy Rios of the Culture Campaign, Scott Lively of Defend the Family International, Linda Harvey of Mission America, William Greene of RightMarch.com, Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth, John Haskins of Parents’ Rights Coalition and others.

“If any conservative thinks Romney’s ‘management skills’ qualify him to run a nation in need of moral vision, clear worldview and the other higher virtues of leadership exhibited, for example, by Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan, they have a lot to learn about Romney’s history and the history of ‘management’ presidencies such as that of Jimmy Carter,” the letter said.

[SoConPubbie]

Leaders say he ordered 'homosexual marriage' even though court never asked him to

[samtheman]

Severely conservative.

/s

[353FMG]

Hey Mitt, if you really love this country, step aside.

[no dems]

They also have tapes of Romney endorsing individual mandates in Universal Health Care coverage. Just heard that on FOX News from the panel of 2 Democrat strategists (Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell) and one Republican Congressman. They said this virtually kills any chance the GOP has of making ObamaCare an issue if Romney is the GOP nominee.

[Jacquerie]

Had Romney publicly, loudly, repeatedly told the MA Scrotus to pack sand, he would be gliding toward the GOP nomination with the wind at his back.

[Jacquerie]

Is there any wonder what President Newt would do if Scotus declared fag marriage to be a fundamental Constitutional right?

[lightman]

Why choose Øbama-white when you can have the real thing?