Posted on 03/01/2012 10:37:09 AM PST by Nachum
A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video below. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.
The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.
The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.
The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.
Could this or a similar secret weapon have been used, for instance, in the recent death of 52-year-old Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings? Pittman, whose fight to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny led Bloomberg News to sue the central bank and win, died of a heart attack on Nov. 25th.
Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Defends a Sharia loving judge is enough proof for me.
I read your history troll.
You know, small minds also tend to retreat to “attack the messenger” when they cannot confront the message.
So tell me, what is conservative about advancing the assassination theory without a shred of evidence supporting such?
Give me a single piece of hard evidence that supports the contention that Breitbart was killed. A single piece! Or is it just easier to make conservatives look like loons by latching onto conspiracy theories?
Talk about the “troll.”
You know why this stuff gets my blood boiling? Because the left will take threads like these and say, “you see those conservatives over their, they are idiots who think conspiracies rule the day!” They put all of us in the same category as those who think NASA faked the moon landing.
Spouting off opinions without evidence to back them up isn’t a conservative trait at all.
If that makes me a “concern troll” so be it.
Exactly....walking alone at that hour?
Odd behavior. Even Glenn Beck has a security detail every where he goes.
It would be very odd for Breitbart to not have one also.
And as fast as they came out with the ‘natural causes’ edict...
The whole line is shakey, but if the family is under threat...they are feeding the lines.
That was part of Andrew's charm. He was fearless. And- up until the time he announced he had damning videos about Obama, relatively harmless to the interests that want Obama right where he is. It is, if true, powerful evidence that we will see their man in the White House.
TROLL! TROLL and TROLL and you’re busted.
Obama, Soros and the CIA are the only ones who would have to ability to pull off such a murder.
The Examiner article
CIA secret weapon of assassination - Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975
Link to a longer 45 min. vid on the CIA
http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/secrets_cia
“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination.”
(Alternatively attributed to either Herbert Spencer or William Poole)
There is no conspiracy theory, yet. Is there some probability between zero and one that Andrew Breitbart was murdered? Of course there is. Where that probability lies on the spectrum may fluctuate with the accretion of information and evidence in the days ahead. I don’t know about troll. I do know about argumentative behavioral disorder.
One of my friends saw this CPAC speech Andrew gave and said he appeared “disheveled” and slurring his speech.
bttt
37-year-old Public Domain technology bump for later.....
He was meeting someone in a nearby park who had additional video documentation on Obama as well as a copy of all his locked college transcripts. Those documents would have blown the lid off Obama since they also reveal who his financial benefactors were that paid his way thru college........That someone he was meeting goes by the code name "Deepthroat". Coincidence? I think not.....
So I take it then that you trust Obama and his administration and don’t think that they would do anything to cover for their dear leader?
It’s not like Obama has done anything to hide his past or his records or anything. He’s an open book on what he’s done and where he’s been and his birth records and such.
Why would anything Obama or his minions have done make one jump to conclusions about the death of someone who, supposedly” has video of Obama during a time of life Obama has spent thousands on to keep hidden?
Nope. No reason to think of anyone being in danger.
I guess I shouldn’t be surprised to learn his family is under threat as well - there is nothing beneath those without a soul. I am just sick over this whole thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.