Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA secret weapon of assassination Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975 New World Order Report
Youtube ^ | 3/1/12 | Examiner.com

Posted on 03/01/2012 10:37:09 AM PST by Nachum

A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video below. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.

The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.

The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.

The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.

Could this or a similar secret weapon have been used, for instance, in the recent death of 52-year-old Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings? Pittman, whose fight to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny led Bloomberg News to sue the central bank and win, died of a heart attack on Nov. 25th.

Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assassination; cia; onspiracytheories; secret; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: willamedwardwallace
Photobucket
61 posted on 03/01/2012 11:16:32 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace
Photobucket
62 posted on 03/01/2012 11:17:37 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Thanks for the link to the Toll's post.

Defends a Sharia loving judge is enough proof for me.

63 posted on 03/01/2012 11:21:18 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace

I read your history troll.


64 posted on 03/01/2012 11:22:25 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

You know, small minds also tend to retreat to “attack the messenger” when they cannot confront the message.

So tell me, what is conservative about advancing the assassination theory without a shred of evidence supporting such?

Give me a single piece of hard evidence that supports the contention that Breitbart was killed. A single piece! Or is it just easier to make conservatives look like loons by latching onto conspiracy theories?

Talk about the “troll.”

You know why this stuff gets my blood boiling? Because the left will take threads like these and say, “you see those conservatives over their, they are idiots who think conspiracies rule the day!” They put all of us in the same category as those who think NASA faked the moon landing.

Spouting off opinions without evidence to back them up isn’t a conservative trait at all.

If that makes me a “concern troll” so be it.


65 posted on 03/01/2012 11:23:15 AM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AllAmericanGirl44

Exactly....walking alone at that hour?

Odd behavior. Even Glenn Beck has a security detail every where he goes.

It would be very odd for Breitbart to not have one also.

And as fast as they came out with the ‘natural causes’ edict...

The whole line is shakey, but if the family is under threat...they are feeding the lines.


66 posted on 03/01/2012 11:23:26 AM PST by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace
The most dangerous and successful conspiracies take place in public, in plain sight, under the clear, bright light of day -- usually with TV cameras focused on them. L. Neil Smith. Sci-fi Author and political pundit.
67 posted on 03/01/2012 11:23:52 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed
in the 35 - 44 year old age group, there is a 6.7 out of 10,000 incidence of heart attack requiring hospitalization. IOW, out of 10,000 Americans in the 35-44 year old age bracket, 6.7 of them will have a heart attack that requires hospitalization. that means there is a .067% chance of having a heart attack if you are between 35-44 years of age as Breitbart was. Those 6.7/10,000 individuals would primarily include the morbidly obese, smokers, diabetics, irregular heart rhythms, and those with other predisposing genetic factors that could lead to atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries. Did Breitbart smoke? was he morbidly obese? did he have diabetes, or any other predisposing factors? If not, it's pretty unlikely that he experienced an immediately fatal cardiac arrest.
68 posted on 03/01/2012 11:26:57 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A simple, inexpensive syringe filled with air will do exactly the same thing. Why didn't he have a bodyguard? He had to know that he was in danger.

That was part of Andrew's charm. He was fearless. And- up until the time he announced he had damning videos about Obama, relatively harmless to the interests that want Obama right where he is. It is, if true, powerful evidence that we will see their man in the White House.

69 posted on 03/01/2012 11:30:12 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace

TROLL! TROLL and TROLL and you’re busted.


70 posted on 03/01/2012 11:34:36 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Do they need any targets for furher testing? I know at least three...
71 posted on 03/01/2012 11:34:46 AM PST by DonkeyBonker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama, Soros and the CIA are the only ones who would have to ability to pull off such a murder.


72 posted on 03/01/2012 11:36:09 AM PST by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

The Examiner article

CIA secret weapon of assassination - Heart Attack Gun, Declassified 1975

http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/195/CIA-secret-weapon-of-assassination—Heart-Attack-Gun-Declassified-1975.aspx

Link to a longer 45 min. vid on the CIA

http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/secrets_cia


73 posted on 03/01/2012 11:41:54 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace

“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination.”
(Alternatively attributed to either Herbert Spencer or William Poole)
There is no conspiracy theory, yet. Is there some probability between zero and one that Andrew Breitbart was murdered? Of course there is. Where that probability lies on the spectrum may fluctuate with the accretion of information and evidence in the days ahead. I don’t know about troll. I do know about argumentative behavioral disorder.


74 posted on 03/01/2012 11:43:44 AM PST by Bill W was a conservative (Profile, detain, interrogate, deport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

One of my friends saw this CPAC speech Andrew gave and said he appeared “disheveled” and slurring his speech.


75 posted on 03/01/2012 11:44:54 AM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

bttt


76 posted on 03/01/2012 11:46:03 AM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

37-year-old Public Domain technology bump for later.....


77 posted on 03/01/2012 11:46:26 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AllAmericanGirl44
I am just stuck on the idea of him walking alone at that hour (not being naive to the threats on his life) and how it just so happens that someone is there to witness him collapse. I can’t connect the dots on this one and I’m trying!

He was meeting someone in a nearby park who had additional video documentation on Obama as well as a copy of all his locked college transcripts. Those documents would have blown the lid off Obama since they also reveal who his financial benefactors were that paid his way thru college........That someone he was meeting goes by the code name "Deepthroat". Coincidence? I think not.....

78 posted on 03/01/2012 11:47:00 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (The only solution to this primary is a shoot out! Last person standing picks the candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace

So I take it then that you trust Obama and his administration and don’t think that they would do anything to cover for their dear leader?

It’s not like Obama has done anything to hide his past or his records or anything. He’s an open book on what he’s done and where he’s been and his birth records and such.

Why would anything Obama or his minions have done make one jump to conclusions about the death of someone who, supposedly” has video of Obama during a time of life Obama has spent thousands on to keep hidden?

Nope. No reason to think of anyone being in danger.


79 posted on 03/01/2012 11:49:56 AM PST by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised to learn his family is under threat as well - there is nothing beneath those without a soul. I am just sick over this whole thing.


80 posted on 03/01/2012 11:50:16 AM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson