Kathleen Sebelius: (new) Rule coming soon on contraception coverage

Politico ^ | February 28, 2012 | KATE NOCERA

[NYer]

This will be an implementation rule, so we’ll propose it and have it in place in time

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list

[unixfox]

We’re also talking to union leaders, we’re talking to our partners at labor who run the self-insured plans to figure out a strategy,”

And there you have it folks.

[albie]

I hate the term “reach out”! Especially from Marxist, elitist, snotty bit##es!!

[dps.inspect]

Gawd, she’s ugly... looks like something out of a spook-movie, or the head nurse of a nazi death camp.

[EQAndyBuzz]

Hopefully on Jan 20, this all goes away.

[GlockThe Vote]

We need to oust these radical communists at all costs.

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

My implementation rule is to shove it —sideways!

[MulberryDraw]

Obama and Sebelius should stay out of our bedrooms.

[Principled]

“We intend to propose a rule in the near future on some implementation strategies that I think do exactly what the president says –- which is make sure women have preventive health services and respect religious freedom,"

Women [and men] already have access to preventative health services. What ozero and his health-control law want to do is have other people pay for the preventative health services.

This has nothing to do with availability of health care. It already is available dammit.

[NYer]

Hopefully on Jan 20, this all goes away.

When the bill was written, I thought they anticipated that possibility and set it up so that it could not be repealed. Am I mistaken?

[JayGalt]

The lipstick makes her look like a clown and its not on straight or her lips are askew.

[Notwithstanding]

Sebeastlius doesn’t get it: arbitrary rules that impact Constitutional rights are automatically unconstitutional; no matter how they change it, the fact that they can change it again next month makes it unconstitutional.

People can’t be left to wonder how extensive their rights are; a right that can be curbed tomorrow is nor right at all.

[txrangerette]

Her physical features aren’t unattractive, but what kind of a soul is so supportive of baby murder??

A total supporter and defender of baby murder is now in charge of our lives, through Obamacare.

No wonder she looks like she does, and no wonder people are terrified.

And what does that say about Obama, who put her in charge?

He who was for infanticide rather than caring for a baby born alive because of a botched abortion...

[NYer]

I applaud your freeper name! Thought you might find the following, true story fascinating as it features St. Thomas.

Serbian Abortionist Who Aborted 48,000 Babies Becomes Pro-Life Activist

[txrangerette]

They did all they could to make repeal very difficult.

But yes it can be repealed. The House has voted to repeal it, but there’s Reid’s Senate and Obama making sure repeal stops there.

They instituted some funding mechanisms that make complete defunding of its implementation impracticable. The bill itself still stands, and there’s funding within the bill, rather than in a seperate funding measure, to implement it.

Perhaps that built-in funding is what you’re thinking of...

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

Wonderful story. Thank you!

[AmericanInTokyo]

Ohhh, SURE she has reached out to “priests” allright. Cherry picked, fix-is-in Liberation theology, and sanctuary city type rebellious priests of the Father Cardenal and Father Miguel D’Escoto type in the Nicaragua Sandinista movement. Priests my left foot. Go talk to the AMERICAN BISHOPS AND CARDINALS, Frau Sebelius, Gesundheitsvorsorge-Reichminister. Sieg Heil!!

[pgyanke]

People can contracept to their heart's content already! What they want is for the rest of us to pay for it. I might be persuaded to go along with their plan if they apply it across all "rights".

Let me know when they are buying me a gun for my Second Amendment rights!

[bray]

Next step is abortion on demand in Catholic hospitals.

Pray for America