Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Obama Administration Is Giving Away 7 Strategic Islands to Russia
Gateway Pundit ^ | 2/18/12 | Jim Hoff

Posted on 02/18/2012 4:32:00 PM PST by sushiman

Edited on 02/18/2012 5:30:39 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]


May 1881 US explorers approached Jeannette Island and Henrietta Island and claimed them for the United States. According to some US individuals, including the group State Department Watch, eight Arctic islands currently controlled by Russia, including Wrangel Island, are claimed by the United States. However, according to the United States Department of State no such claim exists. The USSR/USA Maritime Boundary Treaty, which has yet to be approved by the Russian Duma, does not address the status of these islands nor the maritime boundaries associated with them.

The Obama Administration is reportedly giving away Wrangell, Bennett, Jeannette and Henrietta islands in Alaska to Russia. The federal government drew the line to put these seven Alaskan islands on the Russian side
Former senatorial candidate Joe Miller broke this story at World Net Daily:


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Russia; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; bennett; henrietta; jeannette; russia; russianislands; whirlednutdaily; wrangelisland; wrangell; wrangellisland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: sushiman

This has to be fake. I wouldn’t believe it unless he was going to PAY Russia to take them.


21 posted on 02/18/2012 5:36:17 PM PST by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

The islands are located on the Russian side of the maritine boundry, and have long been claimed and controled by Russia. The US only claimed them, but has never controled them. Ozero is just relinguishiing claims made in the 1880s, and would never be ceded by Russia.

Just another demand by his masters - and act of faith, if you will - to prove he really will give Russia all the US missile tech and get rid of US nukes.

Move along.


22 posted on 02/18/2012 5:43:00 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

The Communist in Chief is giving Hawaii to his commie buds?


23 posted on 02/18/2012 5:52:07 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Will he also apologize and bow for us having them in the first place?

I can see this so-called president giving Alaska back to the Russians. This way Sarah Palin is ineligible to run don'tcha know.

24 posted on 02/18/2012 6:02:51 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
So where is the MSM on this?

You don't want to know.

25 posted on 02/18/2012 6:03:20 PM PST by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

All caught up on the Whitney Houston thing I bet.


26 posted on 02/18/2012 6:09:26 PM PST by SkyDancer ("No Matter How The People Vote There Will Always Be A Federal Judge To Over Turn It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Who the hell does this Kenyan bass turd think he is? He can’t do this!


27 posted on 02/18/2012 6:18:46 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (You can only shovel so much crap into a melting pot before you have nothing but a pot full of crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman; All

OK... Now some FACTS.

The Soviets occupied these islands since 1926, with a small group of colonists.

A Small Soviet Airbase, and an Early Warning Radar Station existed on Wrangell, until the end of the 70’s.

Although various western claims have been made on the islands since 1849, the US State Department recognizes none of them.

These are Russian Islands, there is just no official treaty that says so. THIS IS NOT THE WRANGELL ISLAND of the Inside Straights, near Juneau.


28 posted on 02/18/2012 6:19:32 PM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Is it April 1st already??


29 posted on 02/18/2012 6:30:01 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Apparently this was decided by treaty in 1990 , ratified by the US Senate in 1991, and then signed by Bush # 1 . A transfer wasn’t done then because Russia didn’t ratify the treaty and they still haven’t but the Commie in the WH has decided it is time to enforce it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/6/16/153807.shtml

Giveaway of Islands to Russia Risks U.S. Security

Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Monday, June 16, 2003

WASHINGTON – The State Department’s secretive gift to Russia of eight Alaskan islands is a threat to U.S. security. The islands could provide strategic military value to the U.S. in the event of hostilities involving North Korea or China and could provide cheap energy for the United States.

What’s more, unknown to Congress or the American public, negotiations for the giveaway began and ended while Russia was part of the old Soviet Union during the Cold War.

The U.S. spent billions to fight the Soviet empire around the globe, to say nothing of the lives that were sacrificed. The Soviets had gobbled up a third of the world, in keeping with the avowed communist aim of world domination. Yet the State Department, as secretly as possible, agreed to give the communist enemy territory that holds potential oil, gas and fishing rights, as well as a value to national security.

Efforts are under way to persuade the Congress of the United States to bestir itself over this matter, but when Jesse Helms, R-N.C., retired from the Senate early this year, efforts to reverse the giveaway lost a powerful lawmaker who was focused on the issue.

The matter remains in limbo. Ironically, this is because although the U.S. Senate years ago ratified the executive agreement in the form of a treaty, despite objections by Helms and others, it is the Russians who are refusing to ratify the pact. They insist that the land grab, which redounded to their benefit, was not lavish enough.

snip
Henry Kissinger started the ball rolling during the final hours of his tenure as secretary of state in the outgoing Ford administration in January 1977.

Thus began years of secret negotiations that took on a life of their own and continued under succeeding administrations. It was not until 1984 that this back-channel giveaway was discovered when it was quietly inserted into the Federal Register.


30 posted on 02/18/2012 6:36:38 PM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

My only question is why now?

Nothing else pressing to do?


31 posted on 02/18/2012 6:37:31 PM PST by blastbaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
So where is the MSM on this?

Where's the sarcasm tag? You can't be serious.

32 posted on 02/18/2012 6:42:17 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Look at the map my FRiend. These are not strategic.


33 posted on 02/18/2012 6:46:25 PM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

They look more like they should belong to Russia—now when he starts to give away Alaska—then we should worry. My real concern is that he is seen as weak and that may motivate our enemies around the world to try something—a bit of adventurism of some sort-—North Korea—move on South Korea? China move on Taiwan or Vietnam? Iran in the Smaller states in the Gulf? Russia move on Georgia?


34 posted on 02/18/2012 6:51:54 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Negotiations are underway to return Alaska to Russia and Lousiana to France. :)


35 posted on 02/18/2012 7:07:32 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Just looked at a Funk&Wagnalls Hammond World atlas from 1975 (height of the cold war). There is NO indication that these islands were under dispute in the atlas. Normally there is an indication in atlas’s of dispute, but in this case nothing is indicated even though it was during the height of US-Soviet embitterment. I looked at all maps and all extraneous materials to see if it was included in one spot and not another, but there is nothing to indicate otherwise. in fact the boundary in that map is identical to the one included on this thread. I’m not saying there wasn’t a claim, but if there was it was a well kept whisper.


36 posted on 02/18/2012 7:09:35 PM PST by reed13k (Knight Rampant Bibliophile, Protector of Knowledge, Purveyor of Inquiry, Defender of Aged Wisdom, an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Lol, I invite all jingoists to look at the map. The islands mentioned are much closer to Russian territory than American.


37 posted on 02/18/2012 7:58:11 PM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa
Lol, I invite all jingoists to look at the map. The islands mentioned are much closer to Russian territory than American.

As proudpapa correctly wrote, the islands are not militarily worth defending.

38 posted on 02/18/2012 8:02:32 PM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
I'm not seeing seven islands here, I'm seeing seven future potential prison colonies for corrupt US politicians.

What potential we're losing!

39 posted on 02/18/2012 8:44:29 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Next thing you know Obama will give them Alaska..wouldn’t want to go to war for that either, and it is closer to Russia.


40 posted on 02/18/2012 8:56:25 PM PST by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson