To: sodpoodle
what i find troubling is that the federal government is so powerful that candidates can attract that kind of money. Constitutional government would not be powerful enough to warrent that much financial risk.
6 posted on
02/10/2012 4:08:15 PM PST by
DariusBane
(People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
To: DariusBane
What I find troubling is that this guy already gave Newt 11 million dollars—and that he may have been prepared to give him more if things had gone differently.
That’s just wrong..........
11 posted on
02/10/2012 4:12:12 PM PST by
basil
(It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
To: DariusBane
For a country with 300 million people in it, $11 million doesn’t seem so much divided by 300 million.
127 posted on
02/10/2012 7:01:11 PM PST by
PghBaldy
(Person at RP's “Campaign for Liberty”, sold "Protocols of Elders of Zion" for 3 years on C4L site)
To: DariusBane
Constitutional government would not be powerful enough to warrent that much financial risk.So....you gonna vote for Paul? I am.
I am too old to throw my vote away on someone that doesn't agree with me. :)
171 posted on
02/10/2012 9:59:07 PM PST by
carenot
(We'd rather hold on to the myth than fight for the reality)
To: DariusBane
Yes, it is troubling because I am certain that such people do not part with their own money in that manner. Whether it be Adelson or Soros, their money must be laundered in some way or it is coming from other people’s money.
245 posted on
02/11/2012 7:30:15 AM PST by
Hostage
(The revolution needs a spark. The Constitution is dead.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson