Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraniteStateConservative

Fair weather friend?

Did he support Newt before or after South Carolina?

Looks as if he just wants to back a winner - with strings attached.

Perhaps Newt explained that he wasn’t for sale.


3 posted on 02/10/2012 4:03:22 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to bring America back from the brink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sodpoodle

It’s likely, unfortunately, that polls indicate that Newt cannot make sufficient headway.


4 posted on 02/10/2012 4:05:18 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

what i find troubling is that the federal government is so powerful that candidates can attract that kind of money. Constitutional government would not be powerful enough to warrent that much financial risk.


6 posted on 02/10/2012 4:08:15 PM PST by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

I think Adelson’s pretty upfront about his expectations: no legalization of internet gambling. Trump, too. Both will support whoever can deliver that.

SOMEONE has to represent the gambling, prostitution and drug industry.


9 posted on 02/10/2012 4:11:41 PM PST by txhurl (Mormonism = Sharia by White people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

newt not for sell...you made a funny


12 posted on 02/10/2012 4:12:12 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle; DJ MacWoW; TitansAFC; katiedidit1; PSYCHO-FREEP; Jim Robinson

I don’t think Bloomberg and Business Insider are very good sources but time will tell.

If Sheldon Adelson watched CPAC today, he had to have been impressed.

GO NEWT!

GO TEA PARTY!


36 posted on 02/10/2012 4:47:04 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Did he support Newt before or after South Carolina?

Before. This was written before SC's primary. There are hundreds of articles out there mentioning Adelson and Gingrich long before South Carolina. This is dated January 10th. The South Carolina Primary was January 21st.

FTA: Sheldon Adelson, the son of a Boston cabdriver, made his millions as a casino mogul in Las Vegas and Macao, and $5 million of that wealth will help pay for ads and an online video that seek to halt Mitt Romney’s rise in South Carolina, where the contest moves after today’s New Hampshire primary."

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/01/10/casino-mogul-fuels-gingrich-offensive/X4jEYUxngjIXm2waQGuHQP/story.html

Looks as if he just wants to back a winner - with strings attached.

I'd say he wants to back a winner, period. This isn't Adelson's first rodeo and this is not the first time he's supported someone running for president (McCain & Bush, at minimum).

I attended the caucus in Colorado this week. Newt made a grand total of one stop in the whole state, and it was in the the more liberal part. Romney, Santorum and Paul spent their time down here in the part of the state where conservatives live and vote.

We never got a call, saw an ad, saw a piece of mail - nothing from Newt. We were bombarded by Romney's stuff (yuck), and had several nice contacts with Santorum's people. Paul's people are all over the place on weekends. At the caucus, it was all about Santorum. People were not supporting Newt since he didn't bother to show up or make it known that he was running in our part of the state.

I wouldn't know Adelson from a smoldering hole in the ground. But I know better than to throw good money after bad if my candidate decided not to run in some states.

47 posted on 02/10/2012 4:58:31 PM PST by mountainbunny (Seamus Sez: "Good dogs don't let their masters vote for Mitt!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Perhaps Newt explained that he wasn’t for sale.

You don't have much of a sense of irony, do you? But I guess you have a point. The $1.6 million that moved from our pockets into Newt's, via Freddie Mac, would more properly be considered a theft than a sale.

83 posted on 02/10/2012 5:57:54 PM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

Newt explained he wasn’t for sale?

Bwahaha!!!

(And I think Newt’s the best of the candidates we have.)


226 posted on 02/11/2012 4:42:53 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson