[Minn]

Perhaps Newt explained that he wasn’t for sale.

You don't have much of a sense of irony, do you? But I guess you have a point. The $1.6 million that moved from our pockets into Newt's, via Freddie Mac, would more properly be considered a theft than a sale.

[DJ MacWoW]

But I guess you have a point. The $1.6 million that moved from our pockets into Newt's, via Freddie Mac, would more properly be considered a theft than a sale.

You know darn well that Gingrich's company got that money. HE was NOT paid that personally. And the contracts have been made public. Nice try at a smear but you missed.

[grey_whiskers]

The $1.6 million that moved from our pockets into Newt's, via Freddie Mac, would more properly be considered a theft than a sale.

Given that the money you speak of was disbursed over 10 years, perhaps it would be better described as rent than sale -- not theft.

You know, like earning a living.

Cheers!