Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How disastrous was Santorum’s endorsement of Specter? Can you say "Obamacare?"
Legal Insurrection ^ | December 30, 2011 | William A. Jacobson

Posted on 02/08/2012 3:37:31 PM PST by red flanker

Rick Santorum backed Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey in 2004. It was a tough race with Toomey mounting a credible, well-financed challenge.

Toomey’s candidacy, by his own estimation, was one of the precursors to the Tea Party movement:

The “battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party” between big spending moderates and committed conservatives that was evident in 2004 may have inspired subsequent Tea Party efforts, Toomey suggested. Despite losing out on key endorsements from leading Republican figures in 2004, Toomey believes his primary campaign created a strong foundation for conservative activism that translated into victory in 2010.

Santorum not only backed Specter, he cut a commercial for him.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: propaganda; romney4death4u; romneybots; romneybringsdeath; romneybroughtdeath; romneycare; romneydeathcare; romneydeathpanels; romneykilledgrandma; santorum; santorum4mandates; santorum4romney; santorum4spector; santorumbashing; santorumscotus; specter; specterscotus; traitorsantorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Carry_Okie

“that “government shutdown” that had Newt running with his tail tucked?”

Didn’t Dole cave the day before the ‘rats would have?


101 posted on 02/09/2012 12:52:56 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

“The reason I endorsed Arlen Specter is because we were going to have two Supreme Court nominees coming up,” said Santorum. “I got a commitment from Arlen Specter that no matter who George W. Bush would nominate, he would support that nominee.”

excerpt http://blog.lisagraas.com/2011/10/12/the-truth-regarding-santorums-endorsement-of-arlen-specter/


102 posted on 02/09/2012 12:54:44 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sun

There was an agreement between Specter and Santorum in that Arlen would vote for good judges in exchange for Santorum’s support.

His word was good.


103 posted on 02/09/2012 12:55:39 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I have read that argument before but I have a hard time believing Specter was the only guy who could have done it. How will the Senate function without him?


104 posted on 02/09/2012 1:32:43 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Yes, and Santorum said we wouldn’t have Alito, if it weren’t for Specter.

Later Toomey endorsed Santorum.


105 posted on 02/09/2012 1:40:51 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20
I have read that argument before but I have a hard time believing Specter was the only guy who could have done it.

You have to understand how the Senate and its seniority system works. Specter was the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and with his seniority and good relationship with his Rat buddies, especially Swimmer Kennedy, he was able to push Roberts and Alito through fairly easily, even though Alito took some low blow shots from the Rats. I seriously doubt that any other Republican senator could have done it like Specter did.

Listen I detest Anarlin' Arlen as much as the next FReeper, but he did honor his deal with Santorum and as a result, we got a Conservative leaning SCOTUS (for the time being) that has checked Obama and may just strike down Obamacare this eummer.

106 posted on 02/09/2012 3:01:04 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Thanks. If anything, this makes me like him more!


107 posted on 02/09/2012 5:26:12 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: red flanker
If you think this will be a problem for santorum if he is our nominee you are dead wrong. If more than 3 in 100 know about that would be a lot. If half of them hold it against him as a more serious issue than Obamacare and therefore not vote for him that would be a surprise.
This is a total non-issue to the general voting public.
108 posted on 02/09/2012 5:55:07 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; SatinDoll
I provided a link for you.  At the very top of the information provided at that link, this appeared.

It lists the actions Santorum took with regard to Clinton's impeachment.

Here they are.

Allowed the House Managers to present their case.
Allowed House Managers to depose witnesses.
Allowed videotaping of witnesses.
Allowed the House Managers to present transcripts and video of witnesses.
Voted to allow live testimony.
Allowed the House Managers to present closing arguments.
Allowed normal trial procedures in which closing arguments were not disclosed in advance.
Voted to remove Mr. Clinton for perjury.
Voted to remove Mr. Clinton for obstruction of justice.

It was said here that Santorum conspired with Lott to defeat the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Now, does that appear to be true to you at this point?

You responded with the women, the women, the women...

Santorum supported four different methods of women being able to present their case.  They didn't even have to do it in person.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time here.  The goal is to get the truth out.



109 posted on 02/09/2012 8:09:56 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Santorum has explained this. Spector promised him conservative supreme ct judges.


110 posted on 02/09/2012 8:14:33 AM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum! (He takes Paypal now for quick donations!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

That is an excellent piece on why Santorum supported Spector and how Reagan did an act of loyalty similarly but didn’t even get the reward of Supreme Court Justices. Stuff happens. In santorum’s case it was worth it.


111 posted on 02/09/2012 8:33:07 AM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum! (He takes Paypal now for quick donations!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Thank you for the information.


112 posted on 02/09/2012 1:09:42 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I had about 5 min to read some of your link - and I am a pretty fast reader - and it looks thoughtful and interesting. I bookmarked to read it all this weekend...

I will never support your candidate, there is too much else wrong with him, but I don’t want to spread untruths about anybody...


113 posted on 02/09/2012 4:31:19 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Yes!

Are you as sick of the spin and infighting as I am? ;o)


114 posted on 02/09/2012 11:50:46 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

I don’t get acting as if every candidate, who is not THEIR candidate, is the worst human being on Planet Earth.


115 posted on 02/10/2012 12:02:54 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: All

Whether you agree with Rick Santorum, or not, can you at least understand his logic? And this is one of the things that supports his logic:

“Specter won with 53% of the votes over his opponent with 42%. Toomey and Santorum are staunch Catholic Christians, vigorously pro-life and the Commonwealth would be well served by having both in the Senate.

Unfortunately, the politics at the time of the 2004 were precarious enough that a Toomey campaign against Hoeffel would not be as certain as a Specter vs. Hoeffel match, or so Rick Santorum and others believed.”

excerpt http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/061018


116 posted on 02/10/2012 12:09:06 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Ironically, Toomey came out in support of the sodomization of the US military through repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.
That’s a deal breaker, and I won’t vote for him again.


117 posted on 02/10/2012 12:12:07 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

If it had not beemn for Specter, Roberts and (other is a conservative) would not be on the Supreme Court. The Dems were set to filibuster those appts. Liebermann and Specter got enough Dems to vote for them—Let’s hope they can overturn Obamacare. Those appts were worth it (I can’t stand Specter , but those appts were very mportant.


118 posted on 02/10/2012 12:14:48 AM PST by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Sun

If it had not beemn for Specter, Roberts and (other is a conservative) would not be on the Supreme Court. The Dems were set to filibuster those appts. Liebermann and Specter got enough Dems to vote for them—Let’s hope they can overturn Obamacare. Those appts were worth it (I can’t stand Specter , but those appts were very mportant.


119 posted on 02/10/2012 12:15:08 AM PST by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Sun

LOL! I don’t get that, either.

Some people...;o)

I just want a conservative...


120 posted on 02/10/2012 12:17:50 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson