Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Mitt Could Be Beat
The American Spectator ^ | 2/8/12 | Robert Stacy McCain

Posted on 02/08/2012 8:25:55 AM PST by Lakeshark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Lakeshark

I think Santorum could win this if Newt dropped out. I don’t think Newt could beat Romney if Santorum dropped out. Newt has hit a wall with Married women and has too much baggage. Santorum can win this and Newt chould put his Ego away and do the right thing.


21 posted on 02/08/2012 8:51:43 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Santorum and Gingrich really can’t form an alliance because they have very different political philosophies. Santorum is Romney lite - he’s a GOP establishment guy who is different from Romney only in his social conservatism, and in being a dweeby, Jimmy Carter type of person rather than a crazy eyed Mormon missionary type. He’s not likeable, but he’s sure a lot more likeable than Romney, who has absolutely distinguished himself in this campaign by being vicious, petty, deceitful - and having that expressionless, synthetic but at the same time aggressive Mormon-missionary face that really turns people off.

Since Romney and Santorum share a lot of positions and both of them have launched personal attacks on Gingrich, I’d say that voters weren’t going for ideas but for the lesser of two evils. Romney was expected to win, thus indicating a large percentage of middle of the road, semi-RINO voters, and Gingrich wasn’t even on the ballot in the only real primary, so the voters that Romney was courting clearly indicated that he is so unpleasant that they too will pick anybody but him.

I hope GOP Central gets the message.


22 posted on 02/08/2012 8:53:12 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

To the headline: (I wanted to say bat but that’s going to far) so I will say instead, with dirty underwear.


23 posted on 02/08/2012 8:53:38 AM PST by svcw (Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

...there was some sort of embrace of Newt because he was vicious in attacking the media.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
But, you can only ride that ol’ horse so far. Newt has been flat since South Carolina.


24 posted on 02/08/2012 8:53:38 AM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Newt does not like Romney.
I think Newt cares more about revenge than his own delegate count.
Let Newt attack Romney, head on, and let Santorum attack Obama but not attack Newt.
25 posted on 02/08/2012 8:54:14 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Mitt will be beaten (and is currently being bested) in the primaries as greater numbers of conservatives realize that Gingrich is a bane on the ballot, and that Santorum could win.

Gingrich, for all of "pluses" (and there are many) is not electable for many reasons, most important of which (I'm sad to say) is appearance. Too many voters will vote for Obama's car-salesman smile over Gingrich's dissolute slob optics. (Yes, things should be different.)

Mister Gingrich's numerous crazy Ivans while in the Congress and while in front of a camera would provide endless fodder for the billion dollars of campaign $$$ that Obama has extracted from his fellow travelers. The easiest job in the world, my FRiends, would be to write anti-Newt ad copy. There is nobody Newt G can blame for this, he chose to say the things he said, to cast the votes he voted, and to make the "family" decisions he made. Frankly, Gingrich's toxicity is his own doing.

Santorum keeps looking more and more like a winner, and our best possible candidate (from among the group of 4 remaining.)

.

26 posted on 02/08/2012 8:54:27 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libdestroyer; All

Newt and his people have been calling for Santorum to drop out and support Newt. Well, Santorum has won 4 State contests and Newt has won 1. (Mittens has won 2). So, someone tell me again who should drop out.


27 posted on 02/08/2012 8:56:37 AM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Santorum has now won more states than Mitt & Newt. It is time for Newt to drop out, and clear path for Santorum. One on one, Rick will defeat Mitt. If both stay in (Newt & Rick) then advantage goes to Mitt, since he collects proportional delegates in each contest.


28 posted on 02/08/2012 9:01:14 AM PST by entropy12 (Islam is intolerant of every other religion. Western countries are finally learning this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
.but there was some sort of embrace of Newt because he was vicious in attacking the media.

And that will only carry a candidate so far. When you get right down to it, conservatives really prefer a pleasant and positive candidate.

In 2010 they said that my congressional candidate (Walberg)couldn't possibly win because he is a nice guy going up against the true believers of the marxists and their union minions. The democrats threw everything at him and Walberg stayed on message talking about small government, cutting spending and less taxes. Basically he didn't fight back. At the end of the campaign he defeated the democrat incumbent and he did it with half the money.
29 posted on 02/08/2012 9:02:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“What the Santorum-Gingrich tag-team has so far achieved against Romney in sequential contests, they must now attempt to repeat in simultaneous contests.”

The people seem to be doing this on their own. It may not take collaberation between the campaigns.


30 posted on 02/08/2012 9:03:28 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank; All

CHeck out Trisha Erickson’s book: CAN MITT ROMNEY SERVE TWO MASTERS?

Trisha’ father was a bishop just like ROmney. She has much inside information on the subject. Her credentials are outstanding. has spoken on several local radio stations, but has not hit MSM yet.

They are available in paper back from Amazon. You may want to order more than one to share.

If GOP doesn’t vet this issue now. You can bet that Axelrod will in the fall if Romney gets the nomination.


31 posted on 02/08/2012 9:04:08 AM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You may be interested in this article- Romney’s New Two-Front War http://race42012.com/2012/02/08/romneys-new-two-front-war/


32 posted on 02/08/2012 9:04:38 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Gingrich and Santorum have already figured this out. They are both better off if they both stay. Two targets for Romney makes it much harder for him to repeat what he did in Iowa and Florida to Newt. Plus, the more Romney stays negative the harder it becomes for him to be the nominee.


33 posted on 02/08/2012 9:08:48 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Santorum and Gingrich really can’t form an alliance because they have very different political philosophies.

You keep repeating this tired, backhanded attack on Santorum and again I ask - and you seem unable to answer:

Really?

Evidence?

Santorum & Gingrich were united in favor of the Balanced Budget Amendment that nearly passed.

Santorum & Gingrich were united in favor of the Medicare Part D prescription drug entitlement - Santorum later said it was a mistake.

Santorum & Gingrich were united in favor of earmark use as the duty of Congress to allocate government spending. (Gingrich promoted earmark usage as a way to help Republicans get reelected.)

Santorum & Gingrich are promoting radical tax reductions & reforms as a key part of their platforms.

They have many of the same triumphs and missteps. Why do you insist on demonizing Santorum?

34 posted on 02/08/2012 9:14:19 AM PST by RygelXVI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: libdestroyer

That’s my plan, ld.


35 posted on 02/08/2012 9:14:37 AM PST by Mountain Mary (Reputation is what others know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: no dems
You are so right ! They are both week, otherwise one of them would have been consistently besting the Mormon. So, in fact if one were at the top (Santorum has fewer major issues) then a star on the ticket would probably do it.
36 posted on 02/08/2012 9:19:00 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Speaking of war...

Heres Romney in a 2008 debate...

The job description of a CIC from a businessman’s point of view...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBTPZxRcD0I&feature=related


37 posted on 02/08/2012 9:20:09 AM PST by Tennessee Nana (Romney a Massachusetts moderate which is a liberal by Republican standards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: livius

Santorum is Romney lite

This has to be the dumbest statement I have ever seen on Free Republic. Sorry your candidate can’t gain any traction and won only one state but to start spreading insane statements is not a good way to show maturity.


38 posted on 02/08/2012 9:24:32 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

Ever since Michelle Bachmann dropped out I have been saying that Santorum was the only one left worth voting for. I believe that Newt and Paul are the only two in the campaign that never had a chance to win against Obama.

Unfortunately Rick Santorum, while better than Romney is not near the candidate Michelle Bachman was as far as conservative principles. Rick voting against right to work laws is an example of his lack of conservative principles, but you have to work with what you have.

I really think that Santorum has a good chance at beating Romney. He doesn’t need any help from Newt Gingrich, except I think if Newt were to drop out now that Rick could possibly win every primary from here on. With Newt taking 10 or 15% of the votes away from Santorum it allows Mitt Romney to get his 35 or 40% to be at the top.

I realize that it looks like Newt is in it just to hurt Romney, I don’t believe that is true. Newt is in it for Newt and will be just as hard on Santorum as he is on Mitt Romney when he realizes that Santorum will take it away from him.

There is a lot to really like about Newt, I sure love the way he handles the press but his emotions too often get the best of him. I don’t think he could ever win an election against Obama, sad!

I think that Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney could easily win against the “O”. If Mitt Romney was what he says he is in his political speeches then he might be a really good president but alas he has never governed from the right, and I know of nothing to make me believe that he would in the future.

Rick Santorum has a pretty good voting record, he has definitely been on the right side of the abortion issue. Mitt Romney, although he says he is NOW on the right side of the abortion issue, talk is cheap.

Which ever candidate wins, they need to emphasize that abortion has killed 40 milion black kids. I think that is the only way to get the black vote. If you take nearly any percentage of the black vote away from the Democrats you will win the election. Nobody is willing to go after the black vote because they think Democrats is all blacks know and trust, but I think with the abortion issue it is doable.

Go Rick!


39 posted on 02/08/2012 9:27:19 AM PST by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I can't imagine why McCotter backed Romney after holding an event with the description:

"Motor City hospitality dictates a Michigan message to Mitt that our struggling families, entrepreneurs and workers can't afford policies that make Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama less than rivals, and more like running mates." Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56527.html#ixzz1loNQKOSF

40 posted on 02/08/2012 9:29:43 AM PST by RygelXVI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson