Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2012 10:14:05 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: SmithL

Off to SCOTUS.


2 posted on 02/07/2012 10:15:20 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Time to round ‘em up and ship ‘em out GO WEST GAY MAN GO WEST!@


3 posted on 02/07/2012 10:16:02 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Not surprised here. They will be overturned on appeal, as usual.


4 posted on 02/07/2012 10:16:05 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

No surprise at all coming from the 9th Circus.


5 posted on 02/07/2012 10:16:32 AM PST by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

It is what I expected out of the California Appeals Court. Not a shock.


6 posted on 02/07/2012 10:16:53 AM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL; wagglebee

what a shock, NOT

Now would they also say 4 wives for muslims or 9 wives for mormons on religious grounds be unconstitutional too?

Nah did not think so.

Just because they go to their elitist parties and meet their cross dressing and homo friends does not mean what they do and how they act and what they ask for is normal or constitutional

Anyone on our side saying no big deal tot he queer agenda needs to get their head out of where the sun does not shine, this is not about just marriage


8 posted on 02/07/2012 10:17:41 AM PST by manc (FOX, DRUDGE, HAS BEEN DISGUSTING IN THEIR BIASED ATTACKS V NEWT. I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Why do we even vote anymore? What’s the point if some court is going to over rule?


9 posted on 02/07/2012 10:17:58 AM PST by trailhkr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

The question remains. Prop 22 was overturned noting that citizens must change Constitution so Prop 8 was voted on to change the Constitution and yet it is now deemed UN-Constitutional.

The questions remains - how do the American people change their Constitution for a say in how government operates?


10 posted on 02/07/2012 10:18:35 AM PST by edcoil (It is not over until I win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
No big surprise here.

Our Senate Legislature in Washington State just approved QUEER marriage. Now it goes to the House and the governor said she would sign it. They said we have until June to get 130,000 signatures for an initiative to get in on the ballot for the people to vote on, but now with the 9th saying it is unconstitutional to not permit QUE ER marriage, what good would voting on it do us?

I am sick in my heart what is happening to our country.

11 posted on 02/07/2012 10:19:34 AM PST by Spunky ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

It was a known, foregone conclusion that 9th Circus was going to decide this way.

To the SCOTUS with it.


12 posted on 02/07/2012 10:20:00 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL; massgopguy; muawiyah; fwdude; jazusamo; Harley; unixfox; manc; trailhkr1; edcoil
"The ban remains in effect, however, while the case proceeds toward the Supreme Court."
13 posted on 02/07/2012 10:20:16 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I’m looking forward to the “Yes on 8” legal team’s email detailing the decision and their plan going forward. I’d encourage everyone reading this to donate profusely to this excellent legal team. The are up against an army of Goliaths with deep pockets.


14 posted on 02/07/2012 10:20:58 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

How can a constitution amendment be unconstitutional?


15 posted on 02/07/2012 10:21:42 AM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Well that does it. My wife has family in CA. She has been wanting to move back to Thousand Oaks, CA for 5 years now....but is smart enough to realize that it would be insane. I’d rather move to Yuma, AZ and commute to San Diego than become a citizen of CA, where it seems (according to his ruling) that there is no more reason to even have vote if you are conservative.


17 posted on 02/07/2012 10:23:20 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Id rather have a man who wrecked his marriage as POTUS than a man who wrecked his country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smedley

President Newt will ask Congress to disembowel the Ninth Circus. Good. Perhaps the other social justice tyrants will take heed.


18 posted on 02/07/2012 10:23:57 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

No surprise here, everybody knew the fix was any way back when they named a bunch of lib judges to hear the case. As others have stated, this was just a necessary detour on the road to the Supreme Court anyway.


19 posted on 02/07/2012 10:23:57 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Welp! This’ll be for all the marbles at SCOTUS. If SCOTUS manages to uphold the ruling, it would wipe the books clean of any marriage laws that limit the definition to one man, one woman.

Justice Kennedy, God on line 1....


21 posted on 02/07/2012 10:27:01 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

Pre-SCOTUS ping.


23 posted on 02/07/2012 10:27:39 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

Pre-SCOTUS ping.


24 posted on 02/07/2012 10:28:06 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
This is (a) awful, and (b) totally expected.

But really, we shouldn't be against this.

Voter referendums are democracy, and we don't have a democracy. The Founding Fathers gave us a Republic. "If you can keep it," as Benjamin Franklin warned.

By overturning referenda, the court gives a nod toward the republican form of government, IMHO.

Of course, they tilt toward the republican form when it favors the left, and they tilt toward the democracy form when doing that favors the left, so we move in the same direction in either case.

27 posted on 02/07/2012 10:33:23 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson