Skip to comments.
Nevada Caucuses; Get out and vote for Paul, Gingrich, and Santorum, STOP ROMNEY
vanity
| February 4, 2012
| steelers6
Posted on 02/04/2012 1:07:16 PM PST by Steelers6
Anyone you know that will vote for these 3 candidates in Nevada, get them to the caucuses today.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: today; vanity; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
02/04/2012 1:07:26 PM PST
by
Steelers6
To: Steelers6
Nevada is South Utah and its also Sodom & Gomorrah.... Romney likely wins in a walk.
2
posted on
02/04/2012 1:13:08 PM PST
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Steelers6
I the push is to get the voters out for Paul, Gingrich, and Santorum then Romney wins. If Paul and Santorum gets the hell out of the race, then Gingrich might win NV. That is if the Mormons decide to not vote.
To: Steelers6
Drive a friend! Or Walk!
4
posted on
02/04/2012 1:27:02 PM PST
by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: Steelers6
The mormons are beginning to get on my nerves. Mitt Romney lied about Newt in his Florida ads and he continues to be put up on this high pedestal. People please stop Romney.
To: Logical me; Steelers6
If the push is to get the voters out for Paul, Gingrich, and Santorum then Romney winsYep, splitting the notRomney vote just helps Romney yet again.
Paul is hopeless and in it for Paul, but perhaps Santorum could be convinced to withdraw in time to stop Mitt.
6
posted on
02/04/2012 1:37:32 PM PST
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: D-fendr
The vote is proportional, any vote that doesn’t go to Romney is good because his vote will go down.
7
posted on
02/04/2012 1:40:29 PM PST
by
Steelers6
To: All; Steelers6
Romney won with 51% in 2008; Ron Paul was second with less than 14%.
To: Steelers6
9
posted on
02/04/2012 1:41:13 PM PST
by
Vaquero
To: D-fendr
Paul and his bots think it's all a f*ing videogame. Santorum thinks he can convince people he's on a holy quest. I don't think either one of them, or their followers, really gives a shit about the Republic.
To: D-fendr
11
posted on
02/04/2012 1:43:06 PM PST
by
entropy12
(Socialism has failed everywhere tried. It breeds mediocrity, corruption, nepotism & poverty for all)
To: Steelers6
The vote is proportional, any vote that doesnt go to Romney is good because his vote will go down.But that's counterbalanced by the fact that his opponents votes will be split. That's how Romney wins with less than a majority, (heck less than 30%) support.
12
posted on
02/04/2012 1:48:50 PM PST
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: entropy12
I believe the poll in your link is just for N. Carolina, and taken just after Iowa.
13
posted on
02/04/2012 1:55:24 PM PST
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Steelers6
To: D-fendr
I question Newt's ability to go the distance. It scared me when Newt said hed decided to stay in after SC even if he lost. What other option was there, to drop? If Santorum's forced out and Newt takes a dive, our options will consist of Romney or Paul.
15
posted on
02/04/2012 2:23:34 PM PST
by
Kenny
(<p><i)
To: Kenny
I question Newt's ability to go the distance. It scared me when Newt said hed decided to stay in after SC even if he lost. What other option was there, to drop? If Santorum's forced out and Newt takes a dive, our options will consist of Romney or Paul.
Why, and if your are questioning Newt's ability to go the distance, why aren't you questioning Santorum's ability to got the distance?
To: Kenny
I hear you Kenny, but if both stay in, we have no options: Romney wins.
I know it’s not quite that simple, but the math is going to get pretty rough soon.
If everyone coalesced around Santorum, I’d be fine with him; but I don’t think it is, will or can.
RIck’s problem, IMHO, is he’s too soft or I dunno how to say it. Not inspiring as a leader and I can’t see him taking it to Obama. Newt has a prayer, at least, of effectively articulating a conservative message.
Not thrilled with the choices, but this is how I see it now..
17
posted on
02/04/2012 2:34:14 PM PST
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Just got home from caucusing about two hours ago; 12 people showed up for our precinct. 2 for Paul, 2 for Gingrich (one was me) and 8 Mormons for Romney. We talked for an hour among ourselves before we voted. The result:
2 for Paul (no surprise) 4 for Romney, SIX FOR NEWT!!!
I hear-by declare I was wrong about Mormons’ mindless support for Romney. They can be reached with the truth where politics are concerned.
Newt should have done more here, I really think that if he had put his heart into this campaign in Nevada, he would have won it, and it might have been a good antidote to Florida even if it isn't a lot of votes.
But he will definitely get some delegates!
18
posted on
02/04/2012 2:36:39 PM PST
by
erkelly
(Never underestimate the stupidity of the stupid party!)
To: SoConPubbie
As I said, Newt indicated that he would fight on after New Hampshire if he took a solid second. Back then at least he didn’t seem unconditionally committed. Maybe that’s changed with the SC win but I’m not confident enough to run out the only other conservative in the race (except Paul who’s just nuts).
As far as Santorum staying, I’m praying one or the other will go the distance and not force Romney on us.
19
posted on
02/04/2012 2:37:38 PM PST
by
Kenny
(<p><i)
To: D-fendr
I agree with everything you said. Guess the next few days might shape the race one way or the other.
20
posted on
02/04/2012 2:39:44 PM PST
by
Kenny
(<p><i)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson