Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Tancredo backs Santorum
Politico ^ | 02-01-2012 | Emily Schultheis

Posted on 02/01/2012 3:36:06 PM PST by parksstp

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has picked up an endorsement from former Colorado congressman Tom Tancredo (tan-KRAY-doh).

The failed gubernatorial and presidential candidate is a tea party favorite.

Santorum was campaigning in Colorado on Wednesday ahead of next week's GOP caucuses there in hopes of building some momentum for his White House bid. Santorum also was endorsed Wednesday by former congressman Bob Shaffer and former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012endorsements; 2012gopprimary; elections; racism; racisttrancredo; santorum; santorum2012; santorum4romney; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: ReneeLynn

Newt should be strong enough on his own merits and not win because someone drops out. Since that seems to be the concensus that Newt can only win if Santorum drops out means that Newt is a very weak nominee.


41 posted on 02/01/2012 8:33:50 PM PST by napscoordinator (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Santorum is the weak candidate. No one said Newt can ‘only’ win if Santorum drops out, but right now he seems to be Mitt’s right hand. I’m speaking more to Santorum’s state of mind in staying in the race when he clearly has no chance of winning the nom. I question his purpose.


42 posted on 02/01/2012 9:00:10 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

There is a major difference between saying “I’m a Conservative”, and voting opposite of that very thing.

Rick Santorum, who is typical of many Roman Catholics, is socially conservative but fiscally a bleeding heart liberal. He is what he is, and I accept that. For that reason alone, I will not vote for him. Why?

Becasue we need someone who will change the way Washington does business, and Rick Santorum hasn’t met an earmark that hasn’t made him swoon.


43 posted on 02/01/2012 9:02:58 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

I question his purpose.

It really is not your business to question his purpose. You are one vote and for you to go from thread to thread saying the same boring nonsense is not necessary. Santorum has every right to stay in the race. He has 4.5 million dollars left and will win some caucus’ and primaries as he already has in Iowa. No reason whatsoever should he get out unless he decides he wants to. He is the ONLY one who can call for him to get out. You can have your ONE vote like the rest of us.


44 posted on 02/01/2012 9:21:12 PM PST by napscoordinator (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Santorum picked the establishment traitor Arlen Spector over Pat Toomey in the Republican Primary.

A very good decision but you know that. It was brilliant but you don’t understand a thing. It was more important to the United States than anything else these candidates have done. We will be glad for his decision for decades but you know that. You are just running your month on nothing.


45 posted on 02/01/2012 9:25:11 PM PST by napscoordinator (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Of course as a voter it’s my business to question his purpose. What a ridiculous thing to say. As for ‘going from thread to thread’...you’re not talking to ‘me’, dude.


46 posted on 02/01/2012 10:48:43 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

ps. Talk about anointing someone. Nor my business!? Did you vote for Obama in another life?


47 posted on 02/01/2012 10:50:05 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Well, I disagree with your assessment of Rick Santorum’s record.


48 posted on 02/02/2012 5:40:25 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

You might also want to ask why the Newt supporters keep spewing this crap about Santorum endorsing Spector over Pat Toomey, and ask them why Toomey supported the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t tell, and ask them why Toomey supported the repeal of the ban in the military of sodomy and bestiality.. for some reason, the Newt supporters refuse to answer that question because they are disingenuous, hypocritical.


49 posted on 02/03/2012 10:43:19 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ROTB
" no charisma. "

Ahhh yes, people want the American Idol ( worship ) Presidential candidate who can " WOW " the people with with great eloquence....
50 posted on 02/03/2012 10:47:40 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
" Did you see the thread with the poll showing head to head with either Gingrich out vs. Santorum out? Santorum defeated Romney by a wide margin and Gingrich only statistically tied. Santorum’s support does not go to Gingrich - it pretty much splits down the middle."

SO Newt is the one who is splitting the conservative vote, but, you won't know it here on FR.
51 posted on 02/03/2012 10:50:16 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn
" No one said Newt can ‘only’ win if Santorum drops out "

Why then are the Newt supporters are calling on Santorum to drop out then if Newt is not a weak candidate ?
If anything ? it proves that Rick Santorum is a strong candidate considering all the money that both Romney and Newt has and Rick is still managing to be in the race.
52 posted on 02/03/2012 10:54:44 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
" Newt should be strong enough on his own merits and not win because someone drops out. Since that seems to be the concensus that Newt can only win if Santorum drops out means that Newt is a very weak nominee. "

BINGO !

You said it, Newt should be able to stand on his own merits and not be the Goldilocks candidate waiting for the ripe time, or proper moment to make his move, or wait for someone to drop out considering all the money he has.
If anything this proves that Rick Santroum has staying power considering the disproportionate amount of money that Romney and Newt has compared to Rick Santorum.
Another factor ? Newt got all the big endorsements, it didn't help him in Florida.
We were assured by the Newt supporters that SC and Florida was in the bag for Newt..
Newt has ONLY won one state so far.
53 posted on 02/03/2012 10:59:50 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Santorum is so strong he ends up in third or fourth place. I think the real worshipers here are the Santorum people. He has NO chance and yet you cling to him. Like...you want Romney to win or something.


54 posted on 02/04/2012 1:14:13 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

I’m a big fan of Pat Toomey, so I was heartbroken when, right after he was elected, he caved in to the gay lobby on the repeal of DADT. I knew Toomey was more of a principled economic conservative than a social conservative, but he had voted 100% pro-life after he saw his child’s ultrasounds during his first term in Congress and he hadn’t raised any red flags on other social issues. I hope the repeal of DADT was a one-time slip-up by Toomey.


55 posted on 02/04/2012 4:36:00 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

” no charisma. “

Ahhh yes, people want the American Idol ( worship ) Presidential candidate who can “ WOW “ the people with with great eloquence....

***

That’s where we are now. Pray that it change, and the USA worship substance.

That being said, I have seen many posts here describing Santorum as a big government conservative.

I initially supported Palin, then Bachman, then Cain, and now I’ve “fallen” to Gingrich. I’m not asking you to do anything I have not done m’self.

Blessings to you!


56 posted on 02/04/2012 7:16:26 PM PST by ROTB (Christian sin breeds enemies for the USA. If you're a Christian, stop sinning, and spread the Word..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson