Egyptian Cleric Defends Muhammad's Marriage to Aisha: In Warm Climates, Girls Reach Puberty...

MEMRI TV ^ | 1-9-12 | Safa TV (Kuwait)

[pallis]

Perverts defending perverts makes Islam what it is.

[onedoug]

Horrible so-called prophet. Horrible so-called religion. Horrible legacy. Islam will eventually have to be wiped off the face of the earth, or we will be.

[gundog]

In cold places, girls' puberty is delayed until the age of 21 years – as is the case in some cold countries.

Finally, a rational explanation for why Scandinavian teenagers are so sexually unappealing. /s

[allmendream]

Sure it does - it means that a billion people think that Muhammed took Aisha at 9 or whatever - and they think he is the “perfect man” and they seek to excuse and justify such actions - and perpetuate them.

To those girls victimized by this ideology - I would say it means more than just “a thing”, nor would I attempt to convince them that it doesn't mean a thing.

But good luck with that!

[tbpiper]

Read your own holy scripture. Joseph the Carpenter was 90 years old, while Mary was 12 years old.

It's over in Jude 3:21

[blueunicorn6]

9 years old?.....he had sex with a 9 year old girl?.....and that’s OK with them?.....they even defend it?.....unbelievable.

[muawiyah]

You know you are arguing on both sides of the question. I'm not. The story is simply BS.

Moslems no doubt use it to subjugate women.

That should encourage Christian missionaries to arm themselves when dealing with these people. Anyone who uses child rape or stories about how good it is to keep women in line with such tales is a hopeless barbarian who cannot be trusted.

[exit82]

In warm places, girls reach puberty at a very early age – generally at the age of 8 years. In cold places, girls' puberty is delayed until the age of 21 years – as is the case in some cold countries.

That's nuts right there!

[skinkinthegrass]

..so (mooseslims) now use, "GloBULL warming", as a justification for raping (young) children?
Islam, Isn't a religion, just method to rape children. :-\

[allmendream]

I am pointing out to you that what “really really actually happened” is both unknowable and irrelevant to the fact that a billion people think it is true that ‘the perfect man’ took Aisha as wife at 9 or whatnot - and seek to justify and perpetuate this.

This is not arguing both sides of the question- it is pointing out that your minority view is irrelevant to what a billion Muslims believe and practice.

[Craftmore]

i cant find jude 3:21

[allmendream]

LOL. Yeah, I think that is the joke.

[ichabod1]

May Allah silence you, cut off your tongue, and destroy the very foundations of your being, for you are leveling accusations against the master of humanity, the beloved of God, the Messenger of the Lord of the Worlds.

nice.

[muawiyah]

What they believe is more than irrelevant. It is wrong and leads to conclusions contrary to reality.

[Rappini]

Haji is still trying to justify what Mo’s marriage. And I don’t mean Mo of Larry Mo and curly.

[allmendream]

How do you claim to KNOW it is wrong? Even if wrong it makes little difference what actually happened - real events that are not recognized shape history far less than fake events that are widely recognized.

What Muslims believe is quite relevant to the prepubescent girls married off to old men throughout the Muslim world.

It is correct that cult leaders often sexually abuse the members of their cult - often children. The conclusion is that given the power some men would prefer to continue this practice - and that is in accord, rather than contrary, to reality.

Sorry your ‘Muhammed wasn't really a pedophile’ is not accepted by the vast majority of the Islamic world - nor is it likely to be accepted here - and even if true it wouldn't make much difference because a billion people believe it and practice it.

[muawiyah]

The Moslem world accepts all sorts of nonsense and it's still nonsense no matter how many people believe it.

There's a good case that can be made for Mohammad not having existed at all.

[allmendream]

But if he DID exist- you are pretty sure he didn't molest Aisha at 9 - like the accounts of his life and a billion Muslims say!?!? That right there is funny!

If so then what is believed about a fictional character - based upon the writings about that fictional character - are WHAT and WHO that fictional character is - in this case a pedophile.

May as well try to claim that King Arthur, if he did exist, wasn't really the son of Uther Pendragon, and didn't really marry Guenevere!

That is ridiculous!

[muawiyah]

King Ad did, in fact, exist and is mentioned by St. Gildas ~ and others.

St. Gildas also existed ~ his church is just across the way from what amounts to our family ancestral home ~ which he also built about 1500 years ago.

Do you dare doubt King Ad?

This Mohammad guy has no contemporaneous accounts ~ the whole story was put together many years after his death in Damascus.

[allmendream]

LOL. Way to not get my point!

It wasn't about if King Arthur is actually real or mythical - it is your splitting the difference that you are not at all sure if Mohammed existed or not, but you are absolutely sure that if he DID exist - he didn't molest Aisha!

Similarly I could say that if King Arthur DID exist - he wasn't really the son of Uther Pendragon - that was all made up after the fact.

Do you see how idiotic and ridiculous that sound?

Apparently not!