Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
LOL. Way to not get my point!

It wasn't about if King Arthur is actually real or mythical - it is your splitting the difference that you are not at all sure if Mohammed existed or not, but you are absolutely sure that if he DID exist - he didn't molest Aisha!

Similarly I could say that if King Arthur DID exist - he wasn't really the son of Uther Pendragon - that was all made up after the fact.

Do you see how idiotic and ridiculous that sound?

Apparently not!

40 posted on 01/31/2012 12:59:28 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
You are missing the point. Mohammad simply didn't exist. Aisha might have, but she was the mother of an important figure in the foundation of the Arab Empire.

Remember when they killed Ali? Mo ran out of male heirs so your ordinary rules of inheritance didn't work to justify the people who were in line to become the Calilph.

They made it up. They went on to create the Koran itself out of whole cloth and a Christian missionary's manual on how to convert the Arabs in Mecca.

No one made up King Ad.

42 posted on 01/31/2012 1:06:05 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson