Posted on 01/30/2012 8:25:22 PM PST by devattel
An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obamas name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.
But win, lose or draw, the fight isnt going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obamas own adopted political network in Illinois.
The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I've been around this forum longer than most ... I can assure you these wait 'till (typically a month or two down the road) news (investigations) break ... then it's all over for whomever. Never happens ... always a bust. Not optimistic Sheriff Joe has anything ...
obumpa
Attorney Van Irion Files His Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions in Georgia Ballot Challenge
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/attorney-van-irion-files-his-proposed.html
That’s what I was thinking... it might be that according to Georgia law, his hands are tied.
In most places, if somebody doesn’t show up for Court, especially after a subpoena has been issued, you forfeit. You lose. Game over!
Shah mat!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.