Posted on 01/27/2012 6:08:23 AM PST by Pfesser
from Carl:
To all my friends in battle,
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words…we won. Now it’s time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.
Carl
Thank you
“Bret reported this on fox news!”
It’s about time
Some of the side items that got into the records yesterday were very good: from the first two cases - princess nancy submitted modified documents omitting that wording that the purple lipped prince was qualified in 2008; and from Orly, the bogus Social Security Numbers he has used over the years.
That’s the obvious reason they didn’t present anything. What other explanation would any person with half a brain honestly believe?
Not if the certifying body has already been caught falsifying records.
polar bearing.
What’s that?
Where do y’all get this crap? There is no such requirement whatsoever.
It’s the specific targetting of elderly white males.
The judge is an administrative law judge and apparently he issues not a ruling in this type of case, but a "recommendation" and then, the final decision as to whether Obama's name appears on the ballot rests with the Secretary of State.
The judge does not issue any true ruling that is binding on anybody and it's the Secretary of State who is subject to the political pressure involved regardless of what the judge does recommend.
Further, the failure to appear does not automatically result in a default judgement, the judge can still rule on "the facts" as he sees them, not necessarily default to ruling in the plaintiff's favor because the defendant failed to appear.
I am suspecting this one also will be swept aside without a true ruling on the merits of the case. But I hope I'm wrong
Ah. Thanks. Elderly white males need to pack heat. Like the one who shot one of the ferals who attacked him while he was riding a bike.
Really? Lincoln wasn't on the ballot in many Southern States.
And since the Constitution allows the State Legislatures to decide how Presidential Electors are selected, and does require that they be awarded to the winner of an popular election in the each state, the winner doesn't have to be on the ballot in any State.
It will be interesting to see if any of this actually does occur.
Add the "not"
Bret Baier........
Grapevine: Obama a ‘no show’ at citizenship hearing
AT :55 into the video…….
NENE TOOTED?
One must qualify in all of the states to become president of the United States and I believe it is so enumerated
.
Scholars have missed this ultimate check and balance in the "silence of the Constitution". No state can keep any legal candidate off the ballot, but a state can keep anyone off the ballot who does not provide legal documentation they are qualified to be President. That is the Constitution at it's core in the Articles concerning the Presidency. 49 states can state a fraud can be President in their super majority, but if one state demands proof and the candidate does not provide that legal proof, the one state in checks and balances can negate a national Presidential Election.
...The experts will try to state that …….. can not override a majority vote by 49 other states, ……………..A President must be accepted by all 50 states according to legal Constitutional requirements. Any subject failing to provide natural born status can legally be rejected by any one state, and that one state in its minority rights will negate the other 49 states in the check and balance the Founders left silently in the Constitution to protect America from threats domestic and foreign.
.
Can you link to something in the Constitution saying that?
No. Because it's not there.
Geez...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.