Posted on 01/27/2012 6:08:23 AM PST by Pfesser
from Carl:
To all my friends in battle,
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words…we won. Now it’s time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.
Carl
Praise God!
Fox News is as useless as the rest of the MSM.
Supposedly the lawyers from Georgia and Orly Taitz do not get along.
From what I understood yesterday the SOS case wanted proof of Natural Born Citizenship from 0bama.
Taitz wanted to present her version of the birther argument. While Taitz was presenting "evidence" the judge on two occasions told her "that has already been admitted as evidence" at least 2 times.
A comment from the link above:
“Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
If you go to her Webb site it might be explained. In addition the statement "I flew in from the coast on The Red Eye last night" before the court date. She seems to like to use that expression.
I am not a lawyer so a better and more concise explanation maybe be found elsewhere.
Why didn't Fox News have a reporter at the hearing?
The original complaint was for the primary and the general election.
Malihi is considering whether to hit Obama with contempt of court for refusing to honor the order to appear with documents in hand.
I hope Obama IS charged with contempt of court - not only because he has shown the most blatant contempt I can imagine for the rule of law and the entire judicial system, but because that charge highlights the most glaring question of all:
If Obama’s lawyers let Savannah Guthrie feel the seal on a genuinely-certified birth certificate, then why didn’t Obama and/or his lawyer just submit that certificate to Judge Malihi? If it was a genuine, legally-certified birth certificate Obama’s lawyers could have argued that it is prima facie evidence and Full Faith and Credit means it has to be honored as legally probative. It would have blown away Orly’s whole argument. Why didn’t they do it?
The person who could have introduced the certificate and been cross-examined about the chain of custody was the person who picked up the certificate from the HDOH. That person can’t claim that (my paraphrase) “being President is too hectic for me to manage to honor an order to appear” (when in fact Obama was campaigning instead of showing up to court). Why didn’t that person appear? Heck, why didn’t Obama’s lawyer even appear? Obama is willing to spend a LOT of money to deal with these lawsuits but didn’t even send a lawyer who could have given the coup de grace’ in a single blow?
If Obama has a genuinely-certified birth certificate that he showed Savannah Guthrie, then his refusal to submit it when the law in GA required him to do so is beyond incompetent. It is criminal - and contempt of court charges would simply make that fact a matter of public record.
Who knows....So many of the cases have gone nowhere and so much going on to cover yesterday. /sarc
Just saying that Bret is a parrot. If we want him to say something we must send him the material. He once reported something that was accurate. Sent him the factual information and he corrected it the next segment.
I’ve lost all my email addresses and now he just has his twitter address. Anyone know his email address?
That should have been NOT accurate.....more coffee please
Yeah, I understand the Orly Taitz part.
I’m interested in the other 2 cases.
Just sayin!
Ever heard of “rent a mob”?
They don’t need skin in the game to riot, just a few bucks in their pocket.
Well said!!
Carl, if it weren’t for Orly, you wouldn’t have gotten this far so say thank you and play nice.
There were several good synopsis posted yesterday.
From what I remember:
Lawyers were called into chamber for about twenty minutes and the judge told them he would issue a default judment and advise the SoS not to put O on the ballot. They agreed there would be an abridged presentation in order to get testamony and exhibits on the record.
When they returned to the courtroom the gentle in the first two cases were sworn in and proved to be voters in GA.
Then they presented pages of OB book and documentation proving that Sr was his father showing that his father was never a citizen. They also noted the case history that show what a NBC is and highlighted the qualifying part of the contitution.
About all I remember, Dad read it and said they had covered their bases. (He practiced for over fifty years and clerked in the federal court system as a young man)
No lawyers are not going to ruin their reputation and possibly loose their law license by placing a document as evidence they know is forged.
It’s their livelihood.
I believe you have to qualify in all 50 (or 57) states to become president
.
A document, even a ‘forged’ one, that is certified by the issuing state is going to be accepted at face value by courts. As has been discussed, original BCs can be sealed and altered ones issued in their place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2Cwcd5bC07E
Fox in Atlanta covered it.
How about Constitutional Checkmate
The real issue in this is a President is not elected to these 49 United States, but Constitutionally must be elected by all 50 states, unless they have seceded from the Union as the Confederates did. Unless an event as that has taken place, the Constitution is not about Electoral Colleges or being ratified by Congress, but it is about the Union electing a President of all 50 states. Understand that any President can loose the popular vote as President Bush had, and win the electoral votes, along with numerous states, but no President can be President of these United States if he is not on the ballot or certified in all 50 states.
From another FR thread yesterday post 1,031 posted on Fri Jan 27 05:01:52 2012 by Gvl_M3 1 on http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2838105/posts?q=1&;page=1001
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.