Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing In Georgia
WesternJournalism.com ^ | January 26, 2012 | Unknown

Posted on 01/26/2012 12:44:24 PM PST by jmaroneps37

Update: Dean Haskins at Obama Release Your Records is saying that the Judge is entering a default judgement against Obama because he did not appear.

This could mean that Obama might not appear on Georgia’s ballot, although the Obama administration will certainly appeal. Today was an important day in the fight for truth. Despite Obama’s no-show, today’s court proceedings could have a great affect on the eligibility movement as a whole.

A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama eligibility movement and what results we might see.

In the meantime, read the following blow by blow account: Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney Jablonski was a NO SHOW as of course was Obama…..

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: ballot; birthcertificate; bob152; certifigate; eligibility; ga; georgia; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamacitizenship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: thedrake

Would write-ins matter if he cannot get electoral college votes? Seems if he is not eligible, he could not get electoral votes. ??


41 posted on 01/26/2012 2:00:30 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; mickie
I thought I read that decisions by this type of court are not appealable.

However, if this isn't the case, my guess is that the Obama team didn't show today....and they won't show for a decision next time......hoping for a 'Rat judge to make a favorable decision on appeal.

They may have felt they had little hope with this particular judge who appears to have a spine.

Leni

42 posted on 01/26/2012 2:01:41 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

Not till his book comes out will we know how totally scammed we were. He will be living in and protected by another country then.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 2:03:30 PM PST by mcshot (Voter fraud will be the doom of the Republic as desired by the Lib Dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


44 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:15 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


45 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:23 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


46 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:23 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


47 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:23 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


48 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:25 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I don’t know how it works other places, but seems like when they were having the big vote-count dispute in Alaska some months ago, they were COUNTING anything that remotely resembled the one (DNC) candidate’s name.


49 posted on 01/26/2012 2:04:32 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

Can you hear me now?


50 posted on 01/26/2012 2:09:14 PM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF
Could you post that one more time? ;-)
51 posted on 01/26/2012 2:09:17 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
"This needs to be done in Pennsylvania and Ohio!"

Obama and his inner circle are already freaking-out about the possibilities.

52 posted on 01/26/2012 2:13:45 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

“Could be one reason for the no-show: don’t win a fight that doesn’t matter.”

I can just here it. “Those rednecks down in Georgia will just look like idiots saying I’m not qualified. And they weren’t going to vote for me anyway. We STILL have 56 states where we are on the ballot!”


53 posted on 01/26/2012 2:16:48 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Anything Obama or his lawyers says in court beyond debasing the whole process for daring to ask questions, if it were true, would hurt his qualification case. If he showed up and pleaded the fifth, that would be admitting Obama is not qualified for the ballot and is hiding the truth.

Best to just stiff arm the judcial system because they know Republicans and the courts won’t do squat about it.
If the judge and SOS disqualify him from the ballot, he’ll appeal to a friendly judge who will claim that the President is qualified by virtue being the President.


54 posted on 01/26/2012 2:21:59 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: airborne

bfl


55 posted on 01/26/2012 2:24:02 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
IMHO This man is not a citizen of the USA. He will be shown to be an illegal alien.

There are many good reasons for wanting Barry to be outed as a fraud, more payback than I could have ever hoped for.

But before I die, I'm 76, I want to ask for forgiveness for hating this man and his filthy co-conspirators only after he has been totally shamed.

56 posted on 01/26/2012 2:30:37 PM PST by UncleSam (Why must someone else always make the final decisions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

WOW,sorry about that. I saw my computer in some frantic looping motion, wondered if it would multiple post. (at least it was a short post?)


57 posted on 01/26/2012 2:32:08 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

You don’t have OCD, do you? LOL.


58 posted on 01/26/2012 2:34:40 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: UncleSam

Once he is finally shown to not be eligible, a thorough review of every eligibility case should be done, and every judge that threw the case out instead of letting it be heard on it’s merits should be impeached. Unless legal procedures really did require the judge to throw it out.


59 posted on 01/26/2012 3:22:54 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: UncleSam

Once he is finally shown to not be eligible, a thorough review of every eligibility case should be done, and every judge that threw the case out instead of letting it be heard on it’s merits should be impeached. Unless legal procedures really did require the judge to throw it out.

That includes the Supreme court members who voted not to hear it.


60 posted on 01/26/2012 3:23:41 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson