Skip to comments.
Watch Obama's Eligibilit​y Case LIVE in Georgia THURSDAY
SUPERPAC ^
| Jan 26,2012
| swampsniper
Posted on 01/26/2012 4:52:51 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
Livestream of the eligbility hearing today.
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: georgia; hearing; livegeorgiahearing; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nodocumentation; nointegrity; notruth; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241 next last
To: freeangel
I feel like I am watching some rookie court. They can’t even get the sound right. People making phone calls on the mic, beeping, etc.
Get with the program.
101
posted on
01/26/2012 6:53:01 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
To: Apple Pan Dowdy
--
what document are they looking at that says Kenya is birth place? --
It's the citizenship of Obama, Senior being introduced into evidence.
102
posted on
01/26/2012 6:53:22 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
103
posted on
01/26/2012 6:55:25 AM PST
by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: Cboldt
The govt is far larger than what is healthy for the citizenry.
104
posted on
01/26/2012 6:55:46 AM PST
by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: RummyChick
Yeah I hear it the noise... Plaintiff lawyer discussing 1875, Minor v. Happersett ...It is holding and binding.
To: TomGuy
That’s just it though, this case isn’t about REMOVING him from office. This case is about NOT allowing him to be elected again in the state of Georgia.
106
posted on
01/26/2012 6:58:23 AM PST
by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: All
Attorney seems to be prepared - has illustrations which is always helpful.
107
posted on
01/26/2012 6:58:30 AM PST
by
MissMagnolia
(Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
To: RummyChick
To: RummyChick
To: Red Steel
If Obama takes this on instead of running the lawyer can blow this guy out of the Water on Minor.
We will see what happens.
110
posted on
01/26/2012 6:59:43 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Atty describing Constitutional constructs of natural born citizen and Congress inability to change any phrasing of Constitution w/o Amendment process. Lots of reference to Minor v. Happersett, Kim Wong Ark.
111
posted on
01/26/2012 7:01:41 AM PST
by
TexasVoter
(No Constitution? No Union!)
To: MissMagnolia
Good. Enlightening the judge. Still discussing Minor case and the 14th Amendment. Wong Kim Ark narrow in precedent. Does not override Minor v. Happersett. Ark much dicta...these cases do not conflict. Yeah, that’s right OBots.
To: TexasVoter
“parents isn’t singular....” Uh-oh!
113
posted on
01/26/2012 7:03:16 AM PST
by
cincinnati65
(We've been taken for a ride - by Wall Street and Washington DC - Welcome to Amerika!)
To: TexasVoter
1st presenting atty is winding up his remarks. In summary this case about adhereing the Constitution and that Obama’s father’s citizenship precludes Obama’s qualifications as POTUS. Note that defendant’s contempt for court and judicial branch.
114
posted on
01/26/2012 7:04:52 AM PST
by
TexasVoter
(No Constitution? No Union!)
To: cincinnati65
115
posted on
01/26/2012 7:04:53 AM PST
by
brytlea
(An ounce of chocolate is worth a pound of cure)
To: Red Steel
Sorry, you are wrong. Not going to go into it but my guess is that the attorney just speaking read a thread where I discussed the argument and he zeroed in on what the opposing side would say. Good for him.
Doesn’t change the fact that Wong Kim Ark REJECTED Vattel, said the 14th Amendment was declaratory of common law, and ruled Wong Kim Ark a natural born citizen when they affirmed the lower court rule without exception.
116
posted on
01/26/2012 7:06:58 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
To: autumnraine
Thats just it though, this case isnt about REMOVING him from office. This case is about NOT allowing him to be elected again in the state of Georgia.
He was allowed on the ballot in 2008. That sets precedent.
It will be difficult for any court to counter that, unless the attorneys can show that valid legal challenges were made then.
117
posted on
01/26/2012 7:07:16 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: TexasVoter
9:52 - second presenting atty asks for suitable punishment of defendant for failure to appear. Presenting White House schedule as evidence, presumably of defendants availability.
Carl Swensson being sworn.
118
posted on
01/26/2012 7:07:41 AM PST
by
TexasVoter
(No Constitution? No Union!)
To: cincinnati65
oooh .... “failure to appear” .... copy of White House schedule :-)
119
posted on
01/26/2012 7:08:05 AM PST
by
MissMagnolia
(Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
To: brytlea
Looks like they're going for the contempt charge now.
Provided copy of White House schedule and discussed difficulty in conducting the case without the documentation requested from the White House.
120
posted on
01/26/2012 7:08:09 AM PST
by
cincinnati65
(We've been taken for a ride - by Wall Street and Washington DC - Welcome to Amerika!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson