Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration 'Rigging' US Census By Counting Illegal Aliens (Desperation Alert!)
The Church Report ^ | January 22, 2012 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 01/22/2012 1:00:48 PM PST by NYer

The Barack Obama administration is quietly in the process of rigging use of the US Census of 2010, which deliberately counted millions of illegal aliens, for the purpose of restructuring the apportionment of the US House of Representatives. Accordingly, as candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor of one of the negatively affected states (Montana), Mr. Bob Fanning and I have joined with several others in becoming amici curiae in a pending federal lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana against the US Secretary of Commerce, et al., which was filed January, 13, 2012 in the United States Supreme Court.

What has happened is, the US Census Bureau erroneously claims that it “‘is required by the U.S. Constitution count everyone living in this country, regardless of immigration or citizenship status.’” Accordingly, they have counted millions of illegal aliens in the 2010 Census and are using those figures to apportion the US House of Representatives. If this egregious misinterpretation of the US Constitution is allowed to stand, five states (Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, and Ohio) will lose representation in the US Congress to which they are lawfully entitled, while three states (California, Texas, and Florida) will be awarded additional representation in the US Congress to which they are not lawfully entitled. And, of course, this will also directly impact the makeup of the Electoral College, which ultimately elects the President of the United States.

Of course, this manipulation of the 2010 US Census also impacts the election of the US President, as those states that are granted more seats in the US Congress are also granted more votes in the Electoral College as the Electoral College is composed of a “Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress. . . .” (Article. II. Section. I. Clause. 2. US Constitution). And, as everyone knows, under the US Constitution, it is the Electoral College that ultimately elects the President of the United States. Thus, the states of Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, and Ohio, will be unjustly denied their lawful votes in the Electoral College, while California, Texas, and Florida, are being unjustly granted unlawful votes in the Electoral College. Would it not be extraordinary if the margin by which President Obama is re-elected in the Electoral College would be provided by the manipulation of the census data under his control? Again, this would be an outrage!

In essence, the Obama administration is rigging the US Census to steal a congressional seat from the State of Montana. This rigging will keep Montana from having a second congressional representative. If the illegals in California, Texas, and Florida are not included, then Montana will receive two congressional seats and four electoral votes. Under Obama’s rigging plan, Montana will continue to have only one congressional seat and three electoral votes.

Considering the major media and even most “conservative” talking heads have said virtually nothing about this monstrous misallocation of constitutional government is just the latest example of how truly out of touch the people who are entrusted to inform the American people really are.

The plaintiff in this case is the State of Louisiana, which has now been joined and supported by amici U.S. Border Control, U.S. Border Control Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, Institute on the Constitution, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, English First, English First Foundation, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, The Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Public Advocate of the United States, Policy Analysis Center, Virginia Del. Bob Marshall, Oklahoma Rep. Charles Key, Maryland Del. Don Dwyer, Washington Rep. Matt Shea, Wyoming Sen. Kit Jennings, as well as Candidate for Governor of Montana, Bob Fanning, and Candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Montana, Chuck Baldwin.

Attorneys filing this brief before the US Supreme Court are Herbert W. Titus, William J. Olson, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan (of the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. of Vienna, Virginia) and Gary G. Kreep (of the U.S. Justice Foundation).

As citizens of the State of Montana, and as candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor of the State of Montana, Bob Fanning and I are outraged at this unconstitutional manipulation of the 2010 US Census, and the subsequent unconstitutional and unlawful misapportionment of the US House of Representatives. We are further outraged that our own governor, Brian Schweitzer (the incumbent Democrat governor who is term-limited out of office after the completion of his current term) has done nothing to prevent the people of the State of Montana from being denied the rightful seating of an additional US House member from the Montana delegation to Washington, D.C. He has not served as Montana’s watchman, to make certain that our State is being treated fairly by the Obama administration. Louisiana has been forced to go it alone, as the only State willing to bring this challenge. By not joining the lawsuit against the Obama administration, what Governor Schweitzer in essence is doing is allowing illegal aliens to deny the due representation of the citizens of Montana in Washington, D.C. This is an outrage!

It is a gross misinterpretation of the US Constitution to claim that the US Census is supposed to “count everyone living in this country.” Article. I. Section. I. Clause 3. as amended by Section. 2. of the 14th Amendment authorizes “a targeted decennial census of the ‘respective numbers’ of ‘the People’ of the several States, not a wholesale count of the numbers of persons found ‘living’ in the United States.” The term “the People” is a technical term used in the U.S. Constitution to refer to the polity, that is, the people who constituted the government and who are legal citizens of the nation. Only by such a tailored count can the constitutionally-authorized decennial census serve the purpose for which that census has been required–the apportionment of representation of the people of the several states in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“It is manifestly untrue that the decennial census ordained by the Constitution is to be taken without regard to a person’s ‘immigration or citizenship status.’ The decennial census is conducted for the apportionment of representation in the House of Representatives, the members of which are ‘chosen every second Year by the People of the several States.’ (Article. I. Section. 2. Clause. 1. US Constitution). The first sentence of the 14th Amendment establishes a symbiotic relationship between a person’s United States citizenship and that person’s State citizenship. Thus, whether a person is part of ‘the People’ of a State is largely, if not exclusively, dictated by a person’s ‘immigration or citizenship status.’ Any census that ignores that connection is fatally flawed.”

In the afore-mentioned lawsuit, we are asking the US Supreme Court to preserve the integrity of the US House of Representatives and Electoral College.

I can tell you that the people who want to disassemble constitutional government in this country are hoping that no one notices what the Obama administration is doing to manipulate the 2010 US Census to unlawfully reconstruct the US House of Representatives and Electoral College. Well, I can tell you, Bob Fanning and I (along with the other amici curiae supporting Louisiana in this lawsuit) are not going to let that happen!

I will be holding a press conference to blow the whistle on what is taking place to deny the people of the State of Montana (along with the people of the states of Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio) their lawful representation in Washington, D.C. I am also using the influence and outreach of this column to alert the American people as to how the Obama administration is attempting to manipulate the US House of Representatives and Electoral College.

It is more than interesting also that the “anointed” establishment neocon Republican Montana gubernatorial candidate, Rick Hill, has, himself, not even bothered to alert the people of Montana to this travesty. Why not? Rick is a career politician who once served in the US House of Representatives from Montana. One would think he would want to protect the people of the State of Montana from this outrage. But he has said nothing! Plus, have you heard anything about this from any of the “conservative” talking heads on FOX News? No you haven’t! Why not? Why is it left to this column to alert you to this gross violation of constitutional government?

Therefore, I unashamedly appeal to readers to help Bob and I carry this fight to preserve the integrity of the US House of Representative and the Electoral College to the US Supreme Court. Please go to our web site at:

I also highly encourage readers to visit the web site of the law firm filing this brief. William J. Olson, Herbert Titus, et al., have been at the front lines in helping to defend constitutional government for longer than many of us have been alive. Bill Olson and Herb Titus have defended a sizeable number of patriot organizations and individuals against federal usurpation for decades. I don’t know of another law firm with the credentials and track record of fighting for constitutional government, Second Amendment rights, and individual liberty anywhere in the country than the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C.

To learn more about this lawsuit and the Olson law firm, go to:

Link

In the meantime, each of us should be using our individual and collective sphere of influence to trumpet this attempted travesty as loudly as possible! I especially encourage readers in the states of Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, and Ohio to demand of every elected public office holder in their respective states to use every means possible to defend the lawful rights of their states to proper representation in the US House of Representatives and the Electoral College. The people of America simply must not allow this flagrant manipulation of the 2010 US Census to take place! If the Obama administration gets by with this now, think how the states’ representation in Congress will be abused in the future.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; backoffbarry; bhocorruption; bhofascism; census; corruption; criminalaliens; criminalpresident; democrats; democratvoterfraud; electionfraud; elections; fraud; liberalfascism; louisiana; missouri; montana; nobama2012; northcarolina; obama; ohio; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: onyx

Assuming you aren’t playing on the word “candidate”, and are really trying to say that Gingrich is the best conservative who ran for President, you can’t possibly believe that because you supported TWO OTHER CANDIDATES before you came around to Gingrich.

And if we had done a poll in May here at FR, Gingrich wouldn’t have gotten 10% of the vote for “conservative”.


41 posted on 01/22/2012 3:39:10 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Census bureau has been using the same methodology including 12 to 20 million illegal aliens and about 10 million Legal Permanent Residents (green card holders.) It has distorted our electoral system as well shifting federal dollars, which are distributed on that basis.


42 posted on 01/22/2012 3:45:49 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
CC, I've got to suppport Gingrich on this one. Don't get me wrong, I have many a reservation but the alternative are worse. It's going to be up to us to elect a TP Senate and strnghten the Congress with more TP Conservatives so we can hold his feet to the fire...lest he is temped to stray....

It is what it is, Paul is an idiot, Santorum, as much as he has to offer just isn't it this time....Romney.....no thanks.

So all we have is Newt.

If Newt does 50% of what he says he's going to do, that will be a hugh start, series!

Obama again on the other hand will end this Country as you and I know it.

Yeah, I know, It's not perfect and what we TP's dream of but heck, we have to start some where.

43 posted on 01/22/2012 3:48:10 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; onyx
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney. Don’t try to sell Gingrich as the best conservative candidate.

So who is, Paul?

Your post:

You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney.

Fruedian slip?


44 posted on 01/22/2012 4:02:41 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

lol


45 posted on 01/22/2012 5:00:51 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Might as well add dead people to the census. That’s another demographic that votes 100% for the Democrats.


46 posted on 01/22/2012 5:07:19 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Remember that for the first time that The white house took control of the whole Census. The Republicans squabbled for about 5 minutes, and then did nothing about it. As usual.


47 posted on 01/22/2012 6:00:31 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

WHAT THE HELL?

Why isn’t everyone with w voice screaming at the top of their lungs about this?

RLTW


48 posted on 01/22/2012 6:03:22 PM PST by military cop (I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I’m not sure what you meant, but I said what I meant. Clearly, many people are supporting Gingrich because they believe he is the best way to stop Romney, and that is what is important, more important than supporting the most conservative candidate.

But there’s no way he was the most conservative candidate in the race, much less the most conservative person we wanted in the race. He wasn’t even on the RADAR for most conservatives when this race started.

Of the possible and actual candidates, I’d say Gingrich ranks above Paul, Romney, and Huntsman. Maybe also above Roemer. He certainly, in THIS century, has not spoken or acted more conservatively than Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, or Rick Santorum. I’d argue that in this century, he wasn’t more conservative than candidate Tim Pawlenty, or candidate possible Paul Ryan.

Having explained that, I’m not sure how we got into a discussion of Gingrich in an article about the Census.


49 posted on 01/22/2012 6:19:45 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NYer; wagglebee; Nachum; reaganaut; Scoutmaster
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. - Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, U.S. Constitution

Illegals should count for no more than 3/5 of a person, if they are counted at all.

50 posted on 01/22/2012 6:23:07 PM PST by mrreaganaut (Gingrich/Santorum 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

They have to keep the big states big.

Without illegals, California’s population would be sinking.

They need those House seats. They need those electoral votes.


51 posted on 01/22/2012 6:30:23 PM PST by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Clearly, many people are supporting Gingrich because they believe he is the best way to stop Romney, and that is what is important, more important than supporting the most conservative candidate.

I think you just nailed it.

BTW, looking back, maybe I misread your post.

Be that as it may, yes, Gingrich is the best by far to defeat the bamster.

Some time ago I do recall when Gingrich was a pariah here, but I think we've all come to realize exactly what the stakes are here.

My fervent prayer is that Gingrich does half of what he says he going to do, that in and of it's self will go a long way in correcting the course we're on.

I'm also not naive enough to recognize that this mess we're in is not going to be corrected by one man, we're going to have to correct many years, generations if you will, of indoctrinated people entering and voting in the system.

This Country is split, there is no argument, we cannot discount those who have been indoctrinated, it's going to be a tough battle....especially when they depend on funds from sugar daddy.

I hope we can do it at the ballot box, but I doubt it.

It's going to take CWII, imo.

52 posted on 01/22/2012 6:55:04 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks for the ping!


53 posted on 01/22/2012 9:15:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; onyx

If you get the chance, listen to Newt’s post-election speech from Saturday night. I recall two things. First, he came close to promising martial law on the border. Second, he called out a west Texas federal judge by name as a dictator for threatening a school superintendent with jail if “God” was said at a high school commencement.


54 posted on 01/23/2012 4:42:39 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Gee, why not just let the entire population of Mexico vote in our elections? Allow cats, dogs, rats, etc. to vote too. Hell, at they have far more intelligence than the average democrat. If I were running things, NO one would be allowed to vote w/ out proof of citizenship & voter registration. States that do not purge their rolls of dead people, etc. don’t get their votes counted in any election. Ditto states that do not send absentee ballots to our military people overseas on time. They just forfet all of their votes. After all, what is good for the goose is good for the gander...


55 posted on 01/23/2012 6:22:26 AM PST by Bulgaricus1 (Fill your hand you son...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Gee, why not just let the entire population of Mexico vote in our elections? Allow cats, dogs, rats, etc. to vote too. Hell, at they have far more intelligence than the average democrat. If I were running things, NO one would be allowed to vote w/ out proof of citizenship & voter registration. States that do not purge their rolls of dead people, etc. don’t get their votes counted in any election. Ditto states that do not send absentee ballots to our military people overseas on time. They just forfet all of their votes. After all, what is good for the goose is good for the gander...


56 posted on 01/23/2012 6:25:44 AM PST by Bulgaricus1 (Fill your hand you son...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bulgaricus1
States that do not purge their rolls of dead people, etc. don’t get their votes counted in any election.

IIRC, there is a federal law that requires Secs of State to do just that on a periodic basis. The Bamster and his Black Panther Attorney General illegally told the states they did not have to comply.

57 posted on 01/23/2012 7:00:43 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Having done quite a bit of genealogy using census, they did indeed count non-citizens. In some years, they asked if the person was naturalized, year of naturalization, and country of origin. But I’m thinking in those days they were mostly legal immigrants.


58 posted on 01/23/2012 8:50:01 AM PST by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Help!

I think they should only count legal immigrants. But if you think about it, that is the actual problem — that we can COUNT illegals, but can’t deport them. And if you decide to let people stay in the country, they are defacto “legal” whether you call them that or not.


59 posted on 01/23/2012 10:25:52 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Holder is fixing it up so Obama can’t lose. The illegals will be voting for Obama as will their deceased illegal alien relatives and the Americans they have murdered.


60 posted on 01/23/2012 9:54:06 PM PST by floriduh voter ( Obamacare is to you as a can of RAID is to a bug. R A I D !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson