Skip to comments.
Transatlantic flights forced by wind to land for fuel
CBC ^
| January 11, 2012
Posted on 01/11/2012 8:24:53 AM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
01/11/2012 8:24:57 AM PST
by
george76
To: george76
What? You can't get winds aloft when you file a flight plan now?
/johnny
To: george76
This will probably become more common. The last time I flew back from Europe (last month, not on this airline) I noticed that the plane they used was both smaller and older.
3
posted on
01/11/2012 8:28:22 AM PST
by
livius
To: george76
Which is worse, having to land in Canada for fuel or having a New York to London flight blown all the way to Warsaw before they can slow down?
4
posted on
01/11/2012 8:28:50 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
To: livius
And apparently, math is getting harder.
/johnny
To: george76; All
The fuel guys at Shannon are getting a workout, it seems.
This isn’t unusual, AT ALL, we just haven’t seen much of it for a decade or so.
6
posted on
01/11/2012 8:30:09 AM PST
by
tcrlaf
(Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
To: george76
Obama needs to give these Airline companies Billions of Dollars so they can put new “Green” Windmills on the roof of their planes...LOL
To: george76
Pretty soon, they'll probably start canceling flights due to unfavorable winds.
8
posted on
01/11/2012 8:34:49 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> - - -)
To: george76
Reminds me of my harrowing 727 flight across the Atlantic.
Shannon to Keflavík to Gander. We were on fumes before each landing.
Miami Air was the lowest government bidder...
9
posted on
01/11/2012 8:43:34 AM PST
by
TSgt
(Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
To: george76
So how many of these US “Airlines” have Pilots or Aircrew sitting on their Boards or how many of them have “Ivy-League””Educated” “Business” A$$H@LES!
10
posted on
01/11/2012 8:45:48 AM PST
by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
To: JRandomFreeper
And apparently, math is getting harder
11
posted on
01/11/2012 8:45:48 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: tcrlaf
I’ve made over 50 transatlantic crossings since the mid 1980’s. The only unscheduled landing was a security stop in Amsterdam on a flight from the U.S to Paris. Somebody had written a threat on the lavatory mirror.
To: george76
So, going the other way, you just shift her into neutral and coast.
13
posted on
01/11/2012 8:49:06 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: george76
So far it looks like they have not gone out with so little fuel that it is impossible to reach even Canada. When they have to land in Greenland to get fuel, that’s when we should get nervous. But it sure plays hob with schedules, especially inconvenient for craft that carry passengers as well as cargo, when they schedule as though the fuel stop will not be needed. Now that is enough to make even a seasoned traveler cynical.
14
posted on
01/11/2012 8:50:17 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: blueunicorn6
Deploy zeppelins or something like that. A jet can’t just “coast” or it will not stay aloft. It has to have a certain relative wind speed even when it has a tail wind.
15
posted on
01/11/2012 8:53:08 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: george76
The strongest winds over the Atlantic Ocean in more than 10 years BS!
It's not the winds.
The EU sucks!
16
posted on
01/11/2012 8:54:14 AM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
To: george76
The question is, did this business decision pan out in the short term and/or will it pan out in the longer term?
Of course there’s that other little worry. When will the first aircraft crash because it is short of fuel.
To: george76
I don’t like this new trend of using 757’s and A330’s for flying overseas.
I prefer more than two engines when flying trans-continental.
To: HiTech RedNeck
LOL! Ding! "This is your captain speaking. We are currently at 37,000 feet traveling a cruising speed of 493KIA with an outside temperature at a balmy -40 degrees zero. We are now in the jet stream which is running at a higher than normal speed of 170mph. This is going to allow is to kick the engines into neutral and we'll coast right into Europe and still be slightly ahead of schedule. Thanks for flying Coast To Coast Airways!"
19
posted on
01/11/2012 9:23:37 AM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Retired Greyhound
I didn’t know 757s were ETOPS-worthy!
20
posted on
01/11/2012 9:24:32 AM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson