Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup Daily: Romney 30% (N/C), Gingrich 18% (+1), Santorum 17% (-1)
The Gallup Poll ^ | 12-10-2012 | Gallup

Posted on 01/10/2012 11:06:41 AM PST by TitansAFC

Romney 30% (N/C)
Gingrich 18% (+1)
Santorum 17% (-1)
Paul 12% (-1)
Perry 5% (-1)
Huntsman 1% (N/C)

(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt; romney; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: Utmost Certainty
After SC and FL it’ll be too late by far. Coalescing around the 1 viable ABR conservative should’ve already happened a month ago.

I disagree about before SC. But not after SC. IA and NH have quirks that do not make them good barometers of the viability of the GOP candidates. SC does not have those.

21 posted on 01/10/2012 11:21:48 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

You’re celebrating that he’s at 18? That’s half of where he was at before?

This is a horrible poll.


22 posted on 01/10/2012 11:24:24 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
After SC and FL it’ll be too late by far. Coalescing around the 1 viable ABR conservative should’ve already happened a month ago.

I disagree. A month ago was before there was any voting, so there was no basis for the supporters of any non-Romney candidate to concede and switch their support to another non-Romney candidate. We still as of today do not have sufficient feedback from the actual voters for that to happen. After SC and FL there will be a more substantial basis for conservatives to be asked to switch to their second or third non-Romney choice. It is easy to say we need to consolidate behind one. The trick is to pick the one and get everyone who is committed to ABR to agree.

23 posted on 01/10/2012 11:24:40 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: byteback

Occupy hell, the communist party will endorse him tomorrow if he keeps endorsing socialism. The clip Rush just played is a killer.


24 posted on 01/10/2012 11:24:40 AM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bigdirty

That’s what our local radio host said today. Or was it Rush?
If Newt wants to do the right thing, he’ll drop out and endorse Santorum or VV. Consolidaton. Only way to defeat Mittens.


25 posted on 01/10/2012 11:25:55 AM PST by Mountain Mary (Awaken Oh America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Hopefully?

You’d rather see Newt lose than see a conservative win? Ugh!


26 posted on 01/10/2012 11:25:55 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: caww

Doubtful. Dead cat bounce. Santorum’s come from nothing to being a force.


27 posted on 01/10/2012 11:28:09 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; TitansAFC

Makes me sick.

Iowa - 120 votes.

88,000 actual Republicans.

New Hampshire 250,000 votes.

______ actual Republicans?

AND THIS IS GOING TO PAVE THE WAY FOR ROMNEY?


28 posted on 01/10/2012 11:28:16 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Ditto. He is becoming unhinged.


29 posted on 01/10/2012 11:29:08 AM PST by arkady_renko (I want to believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Conservative 40% (Newt+Santorum+Perry)
Romney 30% (N/C)

Wow! That’s great news for the Tea Party! Romney’s in trouble once the conservative vote is not split among 3 candidates!


30 posted on 01/10/2012 11:29:24 AM PST by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

No, I’d rather see Newt win. Santorum’s only one step above Romney for me. Rick “SOPA” Santorum can go peddle his collectivist big government social conservative agenda elsewhere. I’ll vote for Ron Paul before I vote for Rick Santorum.


31 posted on 01/10/2012 11:30:18 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Why are you sick? Santorum won Iowa.

That was a victory.


32 posted on 01/10/2012 11:30:38 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Ok I get it and believe in some repects you are right...we do need to choose our anti-Romney candidate....but I think that is happening currently as voters determine their candidate. I of course want to see Newt as top runner...and I do think that’s exactly how this is going to play out.

PAul will be done very soon and Santorum, though I like him, isn’t what we need for the place our country is at currently...he does not have the fight we need nor the feet to take the steps needed. In “quieter times” I might have considered Santorum but this is not the time for him as President.


33 posted on 01/10/2012 11:31:45 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

I havn’t seen anyone post NH results on FR yet. What’s up with that?


34 posted on 01/10/2012 11:32:05 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

when you look at the graph you can clearly see that Santorum has already peaked and is on the way down, and that Newt is starting to surge again.

Go Newt!


35 posted on 01/10/2012 11:32:54 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

“I’ll vote for Ron Paul before I vote for Rick Santorum.”

Says it all.

You should vote for him now, rather than pushing Newt on conservatives.


36 posted on 01/10/2012 11:32:56 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Santorum is playing spoiler to ensure Romney nomination. shame, but that’s where we are at.


37 posted on 01/10/2012 11:32:59 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
Santorum won Iowa....That was a victory.

Not really....Santorum split the party further and in doing so Mitt still gets the delegates...and that's what has to be prevented.

38 posted on 01/10/2012 11:34:49 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: caww

Why isn’t it his time? I want to hear more behind this argument.

By what folks are saying, you’d think it was Newt and not Santorum that won in Iowa...


39 posted on 01/10/2012 11:34:59 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

At least 13% undecided based upon these numbers and the Gallup poll sample is likely skewed as well.


40 posted on 01/10/2012 11:36:22 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson