Countdown until Zer0 leaves Office: 378 days as of January 8, 2012.
Posted on 01/08/2012 3:49:48 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.
Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to "prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings."
(Excerpt) Read more at libertynewsonline.com ...
Countdown until Zer0 leaves Office: 378 days as of January 8, 2012.
Thanks for 2nd link. Couldn’t see the article either.
If this thing gets “legs” it could walk thru a lot of other States. YEEEEHAWWWW.
I say..........HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE .......HE HE HE HE HE HE HE.
I say..........HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE .......HE HE HE HE HE HE HE.
All he has to do is declare any citizens/judges/politicians who dare question his eligibility as enemy combatants.........and poof they disappear.
The The socialist judiciary will circle the wagons and make sure that will not happen.
Clearly racist.
This ain’t gonna fly.
If the courts fail to come to the “correct” decision, the FEC or whoever keeps its hands on the chains of the South’s election system is going to come down like a ton of bricks.
After all, this is just about race, right? /sarc
LINKY DINKY?
A federal judge will rule against the state if they find to Zero’s detriment. Tie it up in court until after the election and it’s moot.
Click on the abuse button on your first post so they see it. Abuse button comments always go to the top of the on-duty administrator’s queue.
Also, I don’t think “admin” is the admin’s handle, just some FReeper.
Try Admin Moderator....
Yaelle...can you post the link to the latest comments? I assume this is Sunahara?
Really? I never heard that. No surprise though.
See post 18 OR
take off the space and caret in the link that I posted with the excerpt. Don’t know where either came from.
Oh heck, here it is AGAIN:
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31406.php
You are kidding right?
Surprised that the Media is ignoring this??
Come on they have ignored any question of eligibility for the last 3 years.
Children born abroad to two US citizen parents were US citizens at birth, as long as one of the parents resided in the US at some point before the birth of the child.
When one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14. An exception for people serving in the military was created by considering time spent outside the US on military duty as time spent in the US.
While there were initially rules regarding what the child must do to retain citizenship, amendments since 1952 have eliminated these requirements.
Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen mother were US citizens if the mother was resident in the US for a period of one year prior to the birth of the child. Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen father acquired US citizenship only if legitimated before turning 21.
Regarding Paragraph 2 above:
| the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child | OK |
| with five of the years after the age of 14. | Stanley Ann Dunham was 18 according to the fake BC put out by Obama. |
I'm afraid that is not actually true. There was a travel advisory for Pakistan then but travel was not prohibited.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.