Skip to comments.
Romney Up In SC (Romney 30%, Gingrich 23%, Santorum 19%)
Public Policy Polling ^
| 12-7-2012
| Tom Jensen
Posted on 01/08/2012 12:09:05 PM PST by TitansAFC
Romney 30%
Gingrich 23%
Santorum 19%
Paul 9%
Perry 5%
Huntsman 4%
(Excerpt) Read more at publicpolicypolling.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: bandwagoneffect; dempartypoll; fivepercentperry; groupthink; ignorepolls; itmustbetrue; jumponbandwagon; newt; perry; perry2012; perry2020; romney; santorum; scprimary; think4yourself
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: mamelukesabre
The effect of the 11 mill in Romney/fruitLoops ads in Iowa, will wear off now.
Newt already coming back. He will win in SC and then win Florida.
41
posted on
01/08/2012 12:44:01 PM PST
by
rbmillerjr
(Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
To: SumProVita
I am pretty sure Cain said it himself. I think on the Hannity intervew. I could be wrong. Hope a FReeper will verify for us.
42
posted on
01/08/2012 12:44:06 PM PST
by
LuvFreeRepublic
( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
To: trumandogz
Rick Perry 5% Impossible. Perry is going to win in SC, the PerryGirl fanclub has said so! :-)
43
posted on
01/08/2012 12:46:33 PM PST
by
South40
(Just say NO to pro-ILLEGAL alien RINOS!)
To: trumandogz
Santorum was a near zero a few weeks before Iowa. Anything can happen between now and the SC vote and I am glad he stayed in. If Gingrich builds momentum and Perry stays in single digits a few days before the vote, I agree he should step aside and endorse. For now, I like having an option while santorum slides backwards. Newt or Perry are my preferences at this point, and anxious to see how the next week goes. He definitely should get out just before the vote or immediately after depending on where the numbers go.
44
posted on
01/08/2012 12:47:11 PM PST
by
ilgipper
(Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
To: Longdriver
Irrelevant as far as I am concerned, but he could impact the race. What I didn't like is him hinting that he wants a ‘good’ cabinet position offer. Almost sounded like he was selling his endorsement to highest bidder. I forget which interview he was saying that. I think it was last Sunday.
45
posted on
01/08/2012 12:47:13 PM PST
by
LuvFreeRepublic
( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
To: Jukeman
We have a president that should be easy to beat and once again it appears the gop is going with a rino. Is it me? or am I interpreting the debates and candidates records differently? no offense to the Perry or Huntsman folks but I wish they would get out.
If Romney is the nominee...I can’t vote for president which will leave me only voting for state issues and of course candidates for senate.
Praying for a miracle and for Newt to soar again.
46
posted on
01/08/2012 12:50:56 PM PST
by
katiedidit1
("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
To: South40
Jan. 4th (right after Iowa): Santorum 24% (Second Place)
January 5,6,7th: Santorum 19% (Third Place)
But hey, I went through this with Huckabee last time. Iowa is the whole nomination to some folks. No wonder it gets so much attention - it is all it takes to get Conservicide voters to jump to the next Huckabee/Santorum.
Soon, just like with Fred Thompson, Santorum folks will be demanding that everyone who has been vetted and is loaded with money and organization drop out and support their long-shot upstart trying to make Iowa the entire GOP nomination, based entirely on a wing and a prayer and a second-place finish in IA.
And long-shot upstart Huckabee actually managed to trump Romney in Iowa, as opposed to long-shot upstart Santorum.
I will not commit Conservicide again with Santuckabee. No more hopeless long-shots with no money or organization who do well in Iowa after living there for two years. No more.
47
posted on
01/08/2012 12:51:30 PM PST
by
TitansAFC
(Mitt Romney gets less bang for the buck than John-Freaking-Huntsman.)
To: ilgipper
I partly agree with you...I don’t think anyone should drop out based on polls. Wait for some actual primary results before anyone drops out. I like having Perry around as a backup in case Santorum slips. I’m not a fan of Newt.
To: SumProVita
49
posted on
01/08/2012 12:55:01 PM PST
by
LuvFreeRepublic
( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
To: rbmillerjr
50
posted on
01/08/2012 12:55:54 PM PST
by
NKP_Vet
(creep.)
To: ilgipper
Santorum was a near zero a few weeks before Iowa. Anything can happen between now and the SC vote and I am glad he stayed in.No not anything can happen. Democrat and Romney propaganda and push polls happened and what we have is Mitt in the lead.
To: FreeReign
Yeah but regarding South Carolina there is a dynamic left out that regarding McCain that Romney doesn't have.
McCain is a veteran & war hero, that alone sells well in SC. Large retired military population there as well as a number of military installations if that's your main diffrentiator vis-avis the other 2008 candidates then his numbers are obvious. Romney has none of that going for him, he is a northern money guy I don't see that selling better then Gingrich or Santorum. Also I think the Paul strength here is overstated. Gingrich is well known in SC and reasonable well thought of, Santorum is not as well known but well thought of. Satorum's "anti Right to Work " votes might make him a harder sell there.
52
posted on
01/08/2012 12:57:41 PM PST
by
Reily
To: LuvFreeRepublic
I can tell you, he did not say it. Cain is not dumb enough to endorse anyone at the moment.
53
posted on
01/08/2012 12:58:12 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: LuvFreeRepublic
You know, I really liked Herman Cain... but I am more and more sure that he is not presidential material.
54
posted on
01/08/2012 12:58:39 PM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: LuvFreeRepublic
I can tell you, he did not say it. Cain is not dumb enough to endorse anyone at the moment. And he is more than smart enough to see 130% of his support went to Santorum.
55
posted on
01/08/2012 12:59:49 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: SumProVita
I got that feeling a long time ago. Now I get the feeling that he is going to be self-serving. Hope I am wrong because I know it will only add to mess we call the Rep primary.
56
posted on
01/08/2012 1:02:20 PM PST
by
LuvFreeRepublic
( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
To: South40
That is correct, what color is the last place ribbon. If he gets 4% of the vote, at a cost of 800 plus per vote how much will that cost.
57
posted on
01/08/2012 1:03:41 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
To: org.whodat
You provided me with your “he did not say it” comment twice. Thanks. No need to say it again.
58
posted on
01/08/2012 1:04:35 PM PST
by
LuvFreeRepublic
( (I am angry and that is why I am #withNewt))
To: LuvFreeRepublic
“Now I get the feeling that he is going to be self-serving.”
You too? (That makes two of us.)
;-(
59
posted on
01/08/2012 1:06:17 PM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: TitansAFC
60
posted on
01/08/2012 1:12:22 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-173 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson