Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40

Jan. 4th (right after Iowa): Santorum 24% (Second Place)

January 5,6,7th: Santorum 19% (Third Place)

But hey, I went through this with Huckabee last time. Iowa is the whole nomination to some folks. No wonder it gets so much attention - it is all it takes to get Conservicide voters to jump to the next Huckabee/Santorum.

Soon, just like with Fred Thompson, Santorum folks will be demanding that everyone who has been vetted and is loaded with money and organization drop out and support their long-shot upstart trying to make Iowa the entire GOP nomination, based entirely on a wing and a prayer and a second-place finish in IA.

And long-shot upstart Huckabee actually managed to trump Romney in Iowa, as opposed to long-shot upstart Santorum.

I will not commit Conservicide again with Santuckabee. No more hopeless long-shots with no money or organization who do well in Iowa after living there for two years. No more.


47 posted on 01/08/2012 12:51:30 PM PST by TitansAFC (Mitt Romney gets less bang for the buck than John-Freaking-Huntsman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: TitansAFC
Tracking poll from 21 hours ago, Santorum is second nationwide and in South Carolina, and newt has dropped more. Sorry, your spin is not working. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
60 posted on 01/08/2012 1:12:22 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

I honestly don’t have much faith that Romney won’t be the nominee at this point, but if I had to pick a candidate to choose as his main opponent, I think it would have to be Newt. That’s coming from a long-standing Rick Santorum fan.

I was excited after Rick’s 2nd-place finish in Iowa because I thought he’d be able to capitalize on it. Seeing him in action yesterday evening got us such gems as “Iran is America’s #1 problem” and an attempt to criticize Willard Romney the open socialist for being...a business leader?

I’m sorry, but that just won’t cut it. I still think Rick is easily the most pro-life, pro-family candidate of the lot, but I have to concede that Newt is a much better communicator. What good is having a better product if you can’t sell it?

If I had to guess, Herman Cain will probably put forward an endorsement proposal related to his group, the 9-9-9 plan, or both. Maybe he’ll try to get people to join his new splinter group by promising to endorse whoever the members choose.


81 posted on 01/08/2012 1:42:32 PM PST by Cato in PA (ABR: Anybody but Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

You wanna know something, Titan?

You didn’t get behind Santorum when Santorum was second. I sure as heck ain’t gettin behind Newt now that Newt is second.

If Newt was a winner, he would have kept his support from before. He didn’t, so he’s slid from 36 percent nationally to below Santorum.


114 posted on 01/08/2012 3:32:24 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson