Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Up In SC (Romney 30%, Gingrich 23%, Santorum 19%)
Public Policy Polling ^ | 12-7-2012 | Tom Jensen

Posted on 01/08/2012 12:09:05 PM PST by TitansAFC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last
To: katiedidit1

Graham will do whatever McCain did and we all know what McCain did — endorsed Mitt.


61 posted on 01/08/2012 1:12:51 PM PST by varina davis (Elect a real American patriot in 2012 -- Gov. Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

The first is both Gingrich and Perry dropping out.”


Not going to happen as SC will be first poll of the south. Why would either drop out before SC with just a caucus and a NH primary?


62 posted on 01/08/2012 1:13:50 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Didn’t someone just get sent up the river for a backroom deal like that...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/us/politics/after-mitt-romney-deal-company-showed-profits-and-then-layoffs.html?pagewanted=all

In recent years, Mr. Romney has acknowledged having second thoughts about some of the deals he drove, saying his post-Bain career in government had sensitized him to the consequences of his decisions as a businessman.


63 posted on 01/08/2012 1:13:57 PM PST by JediJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Your links are not working. Do you have a “membership” at Rasmussen?


64 posted on 01/08/2012 1:14:49 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Reily

So you think newts draft record will go over big time with the vets. That dog will not hunt.


65 posted on 01/08/2012 1:15:00 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Oops that last one was a mispost.

Didn’t someone just get sent up the river for a backroom deal like that...


66 posted on 01/08/2012 1:15:47 PM PST by JediJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Are Americans that dumb. I cannot see how hard it is to see through Romney. Newt Gingrich is the only chance we have because he is hard hitting and factual.


67 posted on 01/08/2012 1:17:40 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Droid link, try search, you will have the proper results. Sometimes the auto conversion link for your machine fails.


68 posted on 01/08/2012 1:18:04 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic; org.whodat

Cain said that before the SC he will have an “uncoventional endorsement.” In fact he said it at least 6 times while Sean tried to get it out of him.


69 posted on 01/08/2012 1:18:14 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

That cites the one-day poll from right after Iowa.

The only update is the daily tracking poll of Obama. Same poll, same poll, same poll. The Primary poll is from right after Iowa, not 21 hours ago as you falsely claim.


70 posted on 01/08/2012 1:20:24 PM PST by TitansAFC (Mitt Romney gets less bang for the buck than John-Freaking-Huntsman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ez

See my posts on this thread!


71 posted on 01/08/2012 1:22:11 PM PST by TitansAFC (Mitt Romney gets less bang for the buck than John-Freaking-Huntsman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

The most important objective for 2012 is to retire Barack Obama. It would be better—and more fitting—to retire him without a pension that he has not earned, but that’s too much to hope for.

Barack Obama is a Marxist menace on American freedom. Next to that, almost any compromise is acceptable. Romney isn’t perfect, but he will be a better President on his worst day than Obama is on his best day.

That’s the choice before us.


72 posted on 01/08/2012 1:22:55 PM PST by motivated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motivated

Many of us will be going third party if Romney is the nominee.

Romney is just too much to ask. Sorry.


73 posted on 01/08/2012 1:25:22 PM PST by TitansAFC (Mitt Romney gets less bang for the buck than John-Freaking-Huntsman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“Tea Party 47% (Newt-Santorum-Perry)
Romney 30%”

Which is EXACTLY why Perry is still in the race.
To help elect ROMNEY


74 posted on 01/08/2012 1:27:57 PM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Thanks Nikki, we will remember your support for Romney when you run again.


75 posted on 01/08/2012 1:31:06 PM PST by RetSignman (I take responsibility for what I post not for what you understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Well I talk to a lot of South Carolinians and he is liked there much better then Romney. Is Santorum’s draft record any better? I don't recall any military service by him. Newt has been a pro-defense guy for sometime, that's well known.
Look I am not against Santorum, I am just pointing out there is a different dynamic here then 2008.

Is Cheney's draft record an issue with you?

76 posted on 01/08/2012 1:34:35 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Newt will keep rising.


77 posted on 01/08/2012 1:36:27 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Hopefully, Paul and Huntsman can bleed Romney down in NH to a single-digit victory.


78 posted on 01/08/2012 1:41:19 PM PST by TitansAFC (Rick Santuckabee is 2012's version of Mike Huckatorum. Avoid Conservicide voting; support Newt!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

It’s just single-focus social conservatives shooting us in the foot again. These people don’t care about fiscal conservatism nor limited government—else they definitely wouldn’t vote for people like Santorum.

You can count on them to fall all over themselves voting for big government holy rollers like Santorum and Huckabee, every time.


79 posted on 01/08/2012 1:41:54 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ez

“uncoventional endorsement.”

LOL... He is probably going to endorse himself.

Maybe he will say that he endorses any candidate that promises to sell his 999 plan. LOL


80 posted on 01/08/2012 1:42:17 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson