Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt hits Romney: ‘Could we drop a little bit of the pious baloney?’
The Daily Caller ^ | January 8, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 01/08/2012 10:14:44 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: wagglebee

It’s not like I keep it a secret. I support the guy people from all camps know is a consistent fighter (Newt), and isnt afraid to take on everyone from the establishment, Romney, Obama, and the press.

Goodness knows why this decision about the “not Romney” has become so hard. Either we go with the guy that will go to war, or we go with the guys that maybe might, but we aren’t 100% sure.

I sick of leaps of faith for presidential candidates.


41 posted on 01/08/2012 1:26:31 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
That's fine, I don't have a problem with Newt.

All I gave earlier was my prediction based on how the momentum seemed to be going right now. However, this election cycle is the craziest I've ever seen and I'll be the first to acknowledge that things could shift overnight.

42 posted on 01/08/2012 1:31:23 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

Well one thing I realize is that God isn’t a Democrat, because he doesn’t vote multiple times. So that will only get you so far on Earth.


43 posted on 01/08/2012 1:36:05 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Depending on where you lived, you might have gotten Dancing with the stars, like I did.


44 posted on 01/08/2012 1:58:19 PM PST by itsahoot (Throw them all out! Especially the Frugal Socialists who call themselves Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Either we go with the guy that will go to war, or we go with the guys that maybe might, but we aren’t 100% sure.

So who is the one you support? Or are you fearful of the Zot?

45 posted on 01/08/2012 2:00:20 PM PST by itsahoot (Throw them all out! Especially the Frugal Socialists who call themselves Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Uh, that would be Newt.

LOL, I hope I dint give you the impression I was for Romney or something.


46 posted on 01/08/2012 2:11:45 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

Newt’s right on this one. That Romney is a lifetime businessman suddenly smitten with the call to public office is simply not true.

Another exaggerated myth that needs to be revisited is Ron Paul’s military service, which he loves to trumpet while disparaging others.

Ron Paul took a student deferment from the draft for his undergraduate studies and then a further deferment to continue in his studies. He was not drafted in wartime, he was drafted in peacetime in 1963 and served 2 years, leaving active duty service in 1965, just as the US began sending the first combat troops to Vietnam (Marines, August of 1965). Contrary to popular belief, he did not serve in Vietnam. Paul entered the National Guard in 1965

It should be noted that Paul took a student deferment, and later was drafted in 1963, two years before the US began a combat role in Vietnam. Paul then went into the National Guard, which, at the time, was widely regarded as a way to avoid deployment to Vietnam.*

Gingrich, 8 years Paul’s junior, took a student deferment in 1963. Upon graduation in 1968, he would have become eligible for the draft, except that the Selective Service had changed its policy in regard to married men with children, and he thus would not have received a draft notice.

Yes, Gingrich could have volunteered for active service in Vietnam, just as Ron Paul could have. Neither did.

*During Vietnam there were virtually no National Guard units that took part in combat in Vietnam. One exception was the 147th Fighter Interceptor Group of the Texas Air National Guard which had F-102 combat aircraft deployed to Vietnam in May of 1968. That was the month that George W Bush enlisted in the 147th to be trained as an F-102 pilot.


47 posted on 01/08/2012 2:14:19 PM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

That’s why there needs to be a Ron Paul Truth File here on FreeRepublic.


48 posted on 01/08/2012 2:24:23 PM PST by Sister_T (Why should anyone have to repent for an offense they never committed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: classified

But will it change votes>> ??? That is what is needed; another Newt revival in not only NH but SC and Fla.


49 posted on 01/08/2012 2:50:56 PM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
Perry is a five percenter but that might be all Willard needs him to be in SC. What a shame.

Given Perry's consistent poll numbers in SC and fairly consistent poll numbers leading up to Iowa, I think he'll do a little better in SC, but still less than 10%, but let's be honest about something:

Willard and Paul will probably get 50% of the votes in SC because SC is an open primary in a year when the Democrats have an incumbent. Liberals and Libertarians will be crossing over to vote for Willard and RuPaul.

Nobody but the liberals are helping Willard, and they will help him win.
50 posted on 01/08/2012 3:46:37 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

pious baloney. now available where Kosher products are sold.


51 posted on 01/08/2012 4:25:59 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (Ignorance is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Romney explained to the New Hampshire audience why he was running for president and how he is business experience made him different from his fellow competitors."

He and his fellow, bipartisan not-really-competitors have probably done as most established businesses have done for a long time: regulated against any new, small business starts.

No-vote. Starve the B.


52 posted on 01/08/2012 5:28:59 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"You were running for president while you were governor. You were going all over the country, and you were out of state consistently. You then promptly re-entered politics ..."

Pot calling the kettle black...

53 posted on 01/08/2012 6:23:52 PM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Mitt didn’t hang around to the end last time. I doubt that he will now, too.


54 posted on 01/08/2012 7:38:11 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

** but could we drop a little bit of the pious baloney?” Gingrich said.**

Way to go, Newt!


55 posted on 01/08/2012 7:56:51 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

It was like a Rick/Newt tag team wasn’t it.


56 posted on 01/08/2012 7:58:20 PM PST by Sea Parrot (Utopia Is The Opiate of Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


57 posted on 01/08/2012 8:00:06 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
Gingrich-Santorum
 
or
 
Santorum-Gingrich

58 posted on 01/08/2012 8:00:06 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

**And then Santorum will crumble like a cheap cookie and will lose handily.**

I don’t think so.


59 posted on 01/08/2012 8:02:49 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Newt—still the only adult in the room.

I can’t believe that in one weekend, the GOP allowed TWO debates wth loons like Sawyers, Steffie and David Gregory asking gotcha questions.

The GOP is either going to undergo radical surgery after Nov. 6th or go extinct. Changes are long overdue.


60 posted on 01/08/2012 8:21:03 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson