Posted on 01/07/2012 1:21:48 PM PST by katiedidit1
GOP New Hampshire primary debate tonight on ABC at 9pm ET
By Nate, on January 7th, 2012
Tonight will mark the first of two debates this weekend focused on the New Hampshire Republican primary. This evening's debate will take place at Saint Anselm College and is sponsored by ABC News, Yahoo! and WMUR. Sunday morning will feature a GOP debate broadcast on NBC at 9am ET (yes, am) but look for more details on that later today.
Air Time: Saturday, January 7th at 9pm ET / 6pm PT on ABC
Live Stream: WMUR and Yahoo! News
Participants: Santorum, Romney, Paul, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman
Report from WMUR:
(Excerpt) Read more at 2012presidentialelectionnews.com ...
Perry was honest in Iowa about Ethanol
I think all of the candidates have said they are against Obamacare, have they not? Not sure about Huntsman, he may have, but I’m pretty sure all the rest have said they’re against it.
Rush will take care of his audience who is his first love.
ROTFL.
Thank you very much, dear NoPrisoners!!!!
“I’ve spent a lifetime in Texas and I KNOW Perry is conservative.”
I’ve spent half of a lifetime here in Texas...perhaps we’re talking about different people. To me, Perry is the following:
1) Gardasil
2) Trans-Texas Corridor
3) Texas DREAM Act
4) No appraisal cap reform
5) No Illegal crackdown (as in AZ)
6) No E-Verify
7) Judge problem that may cost us 4 House seats
8) Islam coddling - as in Aga Khan
9) Texas Technology (slush) fund
Just a few off the top of my head.
On the plus side he has not screwed up the economy. He was given a healthy state with a good state constitution and good laws, and pretty much kept out of trying to manage it. That was fine with Texas - that’s not the case with Washington. We someone that can actually DO SOMETHING.
Why, because most American's see homos as a twisted deviant perversion?
Do you feel we should be supporting this behavior?
Ha! You left out Gingrich’s remark included Obama,
So I guess Gingrich WAS talking to someone going to be on the Ballet.
As far as Newt being able to get at Romney, The media, who isn’t on the ballet, didn’t give Newt a chance. They never let him talk directly after Romney and then didn’t give him much air time.
But when he got time... WOW did he knock it out of the park.
Go Newt!
Because everyone knows it won’t be returned. A social welfare program has never bene overturned in the nation’s history. The Democrats will filibuster any attempt to overturn it. So unless we win 60 votes in the Senate, that bill is going to stay in place.
Our only hope of killing it is the Supreme Court.
Mine also.
“When does Ron Paul get vetted?”
He only gets vetted if he wins the Republican nomination. He doesn’t get vetted if he runs third party, unless he starts pulling more votes from a Democrat (which won’t happen if a liberal like Romney or Perry get the nomination).
FAbulous news!!!!!!!!!!...Well then that puts NEwt on equal ground $ wise with Mittins.....yeah!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry I missed this debate...am clear back here getting caught up...but this Contribution to Newt was THE BEST news on the threads thus far!!!!!
Go NEwt! Go NEw-tron Bonb!
Yes, they have all given statements that they are against Obamacare. Romney’s words ring hollow. Michelle has led the fight and is out of the race. I have no hope left.
nut bag Paul reminds me of a confused old frail man.
The man should nto be allowed to rub on a GOP ticket as he is not republican nor conservative.
Let him use the libertarian ticket.
I’m looking every where!
I heard it though!
Great point!
Perry shoots straight about a LOT of stuff; and some folks just don't like to hear it.
>
Santorum is too focused on the little things. It’s hard to tell how much was Santorum and how much was the moderators, but Santorum seemed to want to fight Paul more than maybe he should have. If Santorum took every little spat he had with Paul and had instead used that time to attack Obama, I think it would have served him better.
<
I didn’t catch much of the debate, maybe the last 20 minutes. But what I saw of it, I liked in his performance.
His slamming of Paul not only slammed Paul, but clarified his own position as well so it was two fold at the same time. Much needed since Paul has been running a very negative campaign against everyone of the republicans on line hard.
I thought (again from the limited time i saw Santorum) that he did very well and put him right behind Newt.
I don’t think that Newt will do well in the polls at this point though. Just hoping that Paul will be destabilized a bit and taken down a notch. His Paulbots are really hurting the party bad IMO. Especially if they go independent as they are threatening.
Romney may get the nod yet, but if Santorum can hang tight in second, here he may yet pull it out. He seemed to have the where with all.
“I believe 100% that the MSM wants Romney to get the nomination because of his baggage. They would interview every person they could find that worked at a company that was bought and gutted by Bain, they would interview Romney’s relatives in Mexico, they would look at the lack of military service in the Romney family, they would look at his dad, they would look at his religion, they would make sure everybody knows who Warren Jeffs is and try and make the association with Mormons, etc. etc. “
That is 100% true.
Yes, I would agree. Although, if he's complimented Huntsman I think I've missed hearing it. The argument is whether or not Rush has ever said that Perry is the most conservative of the candidates. He's never said that.
“ty much kept out of trying to manage it. That was fine with Texas - that’s not the case with Washington. We someone that can actually DO SOMETHING.”
We need a President to UNDO THINGS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.