*grabs popcorn*
PING for your lists!
Oh boy!
Fantastic!
The devil got kicked out of Georgia?!?
Is it time for panic yet in Obamaland?............
This does not show up on the Google news search. It does on the web search. So if it was going to be heard by a court it would show up under news. I am suspect of this being a true court hearing.
Maybe I missed it, but this story seems to always say the “Georgia court”. What Georgia court, or what court in Georgia? State? Federal?
Great news!
Also posted here:
Judge Malihi Denied Obama’s Motion to Dismiss in GA Ballot Challenge: More Orders Issued
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2828181/posts
Farrar Motion to dismiss by Obama is denied
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2828143/posts
Excellent! Obama will no doubt try to put pressure on GA to drop it. They should indict him if he tries.
I will wait to celebrate.
motions to dismiss are routine.
It is very rare for them to be granted.
There is nothing special about this being denied. Jumping up and down like this is a big victory is silly.
The Usurper is OWNED, and so are the Courts.....no Justice to be had anywhere.
The Nation needs a do-over.
Here's hoping sanity will prevail.
ping!
Now ... who would be the next logical choice if Zero was ever declared ineligible ... hummmmm could it be HITLERY?!?!?!
The only way that this stuff could gain serious legs is for the Clintoons to call in every favor owed to them and get Zero nullified, then Hitlery could step in as the savior of the Dems.
Its possible.
Whether or not this or similar cases go anywhere ‘now’ they need to happen if for no other reason that to lay the foundation for future legal action if the Just-Us Dept is ever fixed and Constitutional government is ever restored in America.
The first argument libs would make is “Why was no action taken at the time? It’s just a post-facto witch hunt.”
Lay the foundation now and let the cards fall where they may.
Should this go through and he be found ineligible, what we can expect is to be facing off with Hillary next November. That would really be a game-changer!
“Minor vs Happersett case from 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 parents which were citizens at the time of the subject’s birth.”
That’s the first time I’ve heard that. All the liberals I know who call “birthers” hysterical nuts base it on the fact of Obama’s mother being a citizen, so he automatically is a NBC. Heard that a thousand times.
Also, this has nothing to do with the Kenya speculations, it has to do with his father’s citizenship status.
Never heard that BOTH parents must be citizens. Finally we clarify “NBC”!
Well, if this ever does get before a judge, doesn’t it make it a done deal? I mean if a legal precedent stands for that definition, Obama clearly does not meet the Constitutional requirement. Do you agree?
Also, if a judge declares his presidency unconstitutional, would it be “revoked” on the spot, and would all Obama’s signed laws, executive orders and such, including Obamacare, be automatically null and void?
I have to admit I find this news encouraging!