Ron Paul. Taking "nuts" to a new level.
Posted on 01/03/2012 2:53:26 PM PST by stillafreemind
Thanks.
It would be interesting to see what the 13 votes were
I’m down it the library (where the wood stove is) with the lap top so I won’t be posting much more tonight. I’ll be happy to discuss issues with you. I’ve posted many time that I think Paul sucks on lots of issues, I am not at all firm in my support for Paul I could go for Newt too. I’ll try to answer your question in the AM. But the short answer is I see Paul as a small constitution government guy. More so then anyone else. Newt maybe, Paul definitely the others not so much. Sadly the choices really suck this cycle.
What you are not free to do is Insult Onyx..
**********
I second that...Onyx has always posted succinct and intelligent responses while being very cordial...even to noobs. Onyx is very respected on FR...so be nice.
“I second that...Onyx has always posted succinct and intelligent responses while being very cordial...even to noobs. Onyx is very respected on FR...so be nice.”
I second that second. Be mean to Onyx and you get what you get.
FRegards,
A lowly noob
“Paul sucks...”
Thank you (whew)
I was getting worried about you. I’m glad to see coming around and saying something - anything - negative about RoPaul.
“In the words of one of traderrob6 who, without having the decency to ping the target of his witticism, “don’t feed the fool.”’
Excuse, but the target was who I posted friend.
Ron Paul. Taking "nuts" to a new level.
Thank you very, very much, wonderful you’s.
I have no idea who that poster is or where s/he came from.
With frineds like you all, I’m in the best of company.
God bless you all.
Thank you very, very much, wonderful you’s.
I have no idea who that poster is or where s/he came from.
With friends like you all, I’m in the best of company.
God bless you all.
Embracing Code Pink, 9/11 truth, etc. may “shake things up” but it is hardly an intelligent or rationale choice.
Racist, anti-Semite, troofer, apologist for terrorists.
What’s not to like? /s
What Republican could have won last time? Probably none after everything that happened in October.
But even before that? Who was the candidate who could have won?
Parties don't always have candidates who can win, but they try to get their supporters out anyway. When did that become criminal?
When Barack Obama ran for office, he said "Hope and Change.' That's all his supporters heard and could repeat. If you said he was a socialist whose administration would be the most race-conscious and class-conscious in history (which we all knew it would be) they didn't believe you.
Hope and Change!
Well we all know what Paul really believes. He's been preaching it in his newsletters since the mid 1970s. He's just smart enough not to say it now. He's a nut. Those who haven't figured it out yet are no different than those who voted for Hope and Change and are surprised at Obama.
If you make a complaint to the admin., you will either be ignored, laughed at, or both.
Nothing personal. Thanks for your service as a Marine.
“Excuse, but the target was who I posted friend.”
Sorry, my mistake. It looked like I was being targeted as a fool because you referenced my posts to some boob you were trying to console. But as you two geniuses have been around here for sooooo long, you couldn’t possibly have made that kind of idiotic mistake once, let alone this time, too.
I always thought that when you referenced someone it was courtesy to include them. But, you old timers would have known that.
****** “ I think your free mind has lost itself. “ *****
Bump and Dittos
TT
Small misunderstanding, don’t see any reason for you to get all wound up and snarky about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.