Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran threatens action if U.S. carrier returns: IRNA
Reuters ^

Posted on 01/03/2012 2:22:04 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Iran threatens action if U.S. carrier returns: IRNA Photo 4:49am EST

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran will take action if a U.S. aircraft carrier which left the area because of Iranian naval exercises returns to the Gulf, the state news agency quoted army chief Ataollah Salehi as saying on Tuesday.

"Iran will not repeat its warning ... the enemy's carrier has been moved to the Sea of Oman because of our drill. I recommend and emphasize to the American carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf," Salehi told IRNA.

"I advise, recommend and warn them (the Americans) over the return of this carrier to the Persian Gulf because we are not in the habit of warning more than once," the semi-official Fars news agency quoted Salehi as saying.

Salehi did not name the aircraft carrier or give details of the action Iran might take if it returned.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; rodomontade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: mkjessup
I don't think the Chi/Coms have the logistics to operate in the Indian Ocean. The Indians aren't exactly friendly.

The Chinese would be vastly overplaying their hand. How are they going to get the oil they need across the Indian Ocean and back home?

Iran isn't a client state of China in the way Pakistan is. They mainly back Iran as a way of poking us and placing themselves as a power broker.

Theoretically, they Chinese could march to Iran via Pakistan, or base fighters there, but I just don't see that happening.

IMHO the forced annexation of Taiwan is just a matter of time. The West has done to Taiwan what was done to Czechoslovakia at Munich, but on a much slower time-line.

61 posted on 01/03/2012 6:07:43 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I have the Des Moines Register from the day the embassy hostages were released, which was also the day of Reagan's inauguration.
The Iranians knew the gig was up with a strong President coming in power.

Same thing today. We have a weak President who the Iranians think they can push around.

62 posted on 01/03/2012 6:11:02 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Thank you for that. An interesting analysis.

Personally I am leaning more towards your second option than the bluff and bluster, precisely because Ahmadinajad is in trouble with his superiors and needs to drum up some personal support, while the MSM in the west runs around screaming the sky is falling.
Almost makes you long for the days when the media respected the ROE and operational security.


63 posted on 01/03/2012 6:30:28 AM PST by EnglishCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

Mind games with BO would bore iran pretty quick. Tic-tac-toe would be the most challenging game available.


64 posted on 01/03/2012 6:38:22 AM PST by LevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Time for the carrier to hang a larry and steam back up into the Gulf.


65 posted on 01/03/2012 6:39:04 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder how long Iran will drag this sabre-rattling on? Given we will soon be in the middle of an intense Presidential primary season, this could get dicey quick. Everyone trying to appear tougher than the other guy. I imagine too, that if anything dramatic happens overseas, Obama and his thugs will milk it for all its worth, at the expense of the country and the GOP.


66 posted on 01/03/2012 7:09:44 AM PST by PghBaldy (War Powers Res: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/warpower.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In another strongly-worded message, Iranian leaders rebuked the sun for crossing Iranian airspace. The Iranians stated unequivocally that the sun would not be allowed to return from the west, where it had departed from Iran only hours earlier. “We are not in the habit of giving more than one warning!” shouted an Iranian general in making it clear that the sun, once it departed to the west, was not to turn around and come back toward the east.


67 posted on 01/03/2012 7:26:21 AM PST by iacovatx (If you must lie to recruit to your cause, you are fighting for the wrong side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

I take it your kid is not on board.

If a silkworm were to hit a CV, there will be casualties,
including horrible burns.

One should be careful what one wishes for..


68 posted on 01/03/2012 8:03:36 AM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Yes people forget Iran has to export also. I think they have a big export terminal out in the middle of the Gulf on Karg Island which we could basically turn into silly putty. We bombed the stew out of it last time around. Plus we could just totally destroy their navy in a day. They have some silkworms that would be worrisome but the price they would pay to blow off a few missiles would be too devastating. They are just pulling our tail because they know the muzzie lovin commie in the White Hut will put up with it. Jimmah Carter redux.


69 posted on 01/03/2012 8:08:00 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This just up on Drudge:

U.S. says will continue to deploy warships in Persian Gulf despite Iranian threats

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-says-will-continue-to-deploy-warships-in-persian-gulf-despite-iranian-threats-1.405289


70 posted on 01/03/2012 8:27:56 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

I’m pretty sure the Chinese who probably not baffled by our PC see the USA as becoming a 3000 mile wide Detroit, patience on their part. The wiley Ruskies on the other hand could use a boost in oil prices.


71 posted on 01/03/2012 8:41:41 AM PST by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mitch5501
From here in Oz it looks a lot like you folks have little confidence your current admin could do much other than give aid and comfort to your enemies.It makes me nervous.

That is because the current administration possesses less competence than Barney Fife and the intellectual acumen of a marmoset.
72 posted on 01/03/2012 8:43:52 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Iran threatens action if U.S. carrier returns

Silence! I keel you!

73 posted on 01/03/2012 8:54:00 AM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

To: silverleaf

I don’t think Iranians even want to start Armageddon war yet. They can take videos all they want as surveillance videos of U.S. warship passing through the narrow strait but they’re not that stupid to turkey shoot any, are you kidding? They may be hoping if hussein would bow to the Iranian threats but he’d be force to take action no matter what.


77 posted on 01/03/2012 10:03:20 AM PST by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Theoretically, they Chinese could march to Iran via Pakistan, or base fighters there, but I just don't see that happening.

Extremely theoretically. No roads, no railroads, no supply lines, no rice, army starves to death. It would take the Chinese 20 years to build a logistics supply line overland to Iran starting at the Chinese border.

Far easier to go by sea. Except for the fact that they have to pass by India, which is unfriendly to China, sitting right there athwart China's supply lines. The Chinese aren't ready to challenge the Indian Navy in the Indian Ocean, much less the U.S. Navy.

78 posted on 01/03/2012 10:08:06 AM PST by Cheburashka (If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
Extremely theoretically. No roads, no railroads, no supply lines, no rice, army starves to death. It would take the Chinese 20 years to build a logistics supply line overland to Iran starting at the Chinese border.

As I said, I don't see it happening, but for an example of how it would be done, see "Alexander the Great".

79 posted on 01/03/2012 10:11:51 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

They have three Kilo Class subs. I think a bunch of torpedoes will ruin a carriers day. It may not sink but it will be out of action for a bit.


80 posted on 01/03/2012 10:29:15 AM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson